Unilateral high-load resistance training influences strength changes in the contralateral arm undergoing low-load training

被引:4
|
作者
Bell, Zachary W. [1 ]
Wong, Vickie [2 ]
Spitz, Robert W. [2 ]
Yamada, Yujiro [2 ]
Song, Jun Seob [2 ]
Kataoka, Ryo [2 ]
Chatakondi, Raksha N. [2 ]
Abe, Takashi [3 ,4 ]
Loenneke, Jeremy P. [2 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Kinesiol & Phys Educ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Mississippi, Kevser Ermin Appl Physiol Lab, Dept Hlth Exercise Sci & Recreat Management, University, MS 38677 USA
[3] Juntendo Univ, Grad Sch Hlth & Sports Sci, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Juntendo Univ, Inst Hlth & Sports Sci & Med, Bunkyo City, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Cross-education; Muscle strength; Muscle hypertrophy; Within-subject model; MUSCLE; HYPERTROPHY; THICKNESS; INCREASES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsams.2023.06.011
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Objectives: Within-subject training models have become common within the exercise literature. However, it is currently unknown if training one arm with a high load would impact muscle size and strength of the opposing arm training with a low load. Design: Parallel group. Methods: 116 participants were randomized to one of three groups that completed 6-weeks (18 sessions) of elbow flexion exercise. Group 1 trained their dominant arm only, beginning with a one-repetition maximum test (& LE;5 attempts), followed by four sets of exercise using a weight equivalent to 8-12 repetition maximum. Group 2 completed the same training as Group 1 in their dominant arm, while the non-dominant arm completed four sets of low-load exercise (30-40 repetition maximum). Group 3 trained their non-dominant arm only, per-forming the same low-load exercise as Group 2. Participants were compared for changes in muscle thickness and elbow flexion one-repetition maximum. Results: The greatest changes in non-dominant strength were present in Groups 1 (& UDelta; 1.5 kg; untrained arm) and 2 (& UDelta;1.1 kg; low-load arm with high load on opposite arm), compared to Group 3 (& UDelta; 0.3 kg; low-load only). Only the arms being directly trained observed changes in muscle thickness (& AP;& UDelta; 0.25 cm depending on site). Conclusions: Within-subject training models are potentially problematic when investigating changes in strength (though not muscle growth). This is based on the finding that the untrained limb of Group 1 saw similar changes in strength as the non-dominant limb of Group 2 which were both greater than the low-load training limb of Group 3. & COPY; 2023 Sports Medicine Australia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 445
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiple Strength Assessments to Evaluate Adaptations to High-Load and Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted Exercise
    Cook, Summer B.
    LaRoche, Dain P.
    Manini, Todd M.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2018, 50 (05): : 243 - 243
  • [42] Effects of low-load and high-load resistance training combined with aerobic training in patients with coronary artery disease: a dose-dependent randomised, controlled trial (PhD Academy Award)
    Kambic, Tim
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 57 (20) : 1337 - 1338
  • [43] Low-Load and High-Load Resistance Exercise Completed to Volitional Fatigue Induce Increases in Postexercise Metabolic Responses With More Prolonged Responses With the Low-Load Protocol
    Grisebach, Daniel
    Bornath, Derek P. D.
    McCarthy, Seth F.
    Jarosz, Claudia
    Hazell, Tom J.
    JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2024, 38 (08) : 1386 - 1393
  • [44] Are the Hypertrophic Adaptations to High and Low-Load Resistance Training Muscle Fiber Type Specific?
    Grgic, Jozo
    Schoenfeld, Brad J.
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [45] Low-load resistance training promotes muscular adaptation regardless of vascular occlusion, load, or volume
    Barcelos, Larissa Correa
    Prado Nunes, Paulo Ricardo
    Marquez Ferreira de Souza, Luis Ronan
    de Oliveira, Anselmo Alves
    Furlanetto, Roberto
    Marocolo, Moacir
    Orsatti, Fabio Lera
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 115 (07) : 1559 - 1568
  • [46] Myocellular Adaptations to Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted Resistance Training
    Vissing, Kristian
    Groennebaek, Thomas
    Wernbom, Mathias
    Aagaard, Per
    Raastad, Truls
    EXERCISE AND SPORT SCIENCES REVIEWS, 2020, 48 (04): : 180 - 187
  • [47] The perceptual responses to high-velocity, low-load and low-velocity, high-load resistance exercise in older adults
    Richardson, Darren L.
    Duncan, Michael J.
    Jimenez, Alfonso
    Jones, Victoria M.
    Juris, Paul M.
    Clarke, Neil D.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2018, 36 (14) : 1594 - 1601
  • [48] Neuromuscular Adaptations to Low-Load Blood Flow Restricted Resistance Training
    Cook, Summer B.
    Scott, Brendan R.
    Hayes, Katherine L.
    Murphy, Bethany G.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE AND MEDICINE, 2018, 17 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [49] Efficacy of low-load resistance training combined with blood flow restriction vs. high-load resistance training on sarcopenia among community-dwelling older Chinese people: study protocol for a 3-arm randomized controlled trial
    Chen, Nan
    He, Xiangfeng
    Zhao, Guoyun
    Lu, Linqian
    Ainsworth, Barbara E.
    Liu, Yu
    Wu, Xie
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [50] Efficacy of low-load resistance training combined with blood flow restriction vs. high-load resistance training on sarcopenia among community-dwelling older Chinese people: study protocol for a 3-arm randomized controlled trial
    Nan Chen
    Xiangfeng He
    Guoyun Zhao
    Linqian Lu
    Barbara E. Ainsworth
    Yu Liu
    Xie Wu
    Trials, 22