Current practices and emerging trends of transit apps for fixed-route bus services in the US

被引:7
|
作者
Bian, Jiahe [1 ,2 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Lee, Chanam [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Landscape Architecture & Urban Planning, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Sch Planning, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
关键词
Transit agency; Transit app; Digital experience; Information technology; Fare payment; REAL-TIME INFORMATION; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; RIDERSHIP; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpubtr.2023.100052
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
In the past decades, smartphone transit apps have emerged as a cost-effective strategy to enhance the transit user experience. This study provides an overview of transit apps used in 295 US transit agencies to shed light on the current practices and future trends of transit apps as a comprehensive information technology that serves public transportation. By conducting interviews with 21 transit industry leaders, we synthesized the perceived benefits and costs of transit apps and identified challenges and the corresponding strategies. Transit apps enhance user experiences by enabling account-based mobile fare payment and efficient two-way communications. To provide high-quality transit apps to passengers, transit agencies need to improve the reliability of underlying data and vendor management. In addition, five existing business models and emerging trends of transit apps were identified and discussed. The findings of this study advance knowledge about transit apps and provide practical recommendations for future improvements and implementations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparing Fixed-Route and Demand-Responsive Feeder Transit Systems in Real-World Settings
    Edwards, Derek
    Watkins, Kari
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2013, (2352) : 128 - 135
  • [32] Perceived Quality of Bus Transit Services: A Route-Level Analysis
    Nikel, Connor
    Eldeeb, Gamal
    Mohamed, Moataz
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2020, 2674 (02) : 79 - 91
  • [33] Factors Influencing Fixed-Route Transit Decision-Making: Exploring Differences by Disability and Community Type
    Maisel, Jordana L.
    Choi, Jimin
    Ranahan, Molly E.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, 2021, 23 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [34] Identifying latent shared mobility preference segments in low-income communities: Ride-hailing, fixed-route bus, and mobility-on-demand transit
    Wang, Xinyi
    Yan, Xiang
    Zhao, Xilei
    Cao, Zhuoxuan
    TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR AND SOCIETY, 2022, 26 : 134 - 142
  • [35] Improving Bus Transit Services for Disabled Individuals: Demand Clustering, Bus Assignment, and Route Optimization
    Du, Jianbang
    Qiao, Fengxiang
    Yu, Lei
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 121564 - 121571
  • [36] The Unprecedented Age Wave and Challenged Fixed-Route and Specialized Transportation Services: The Case of Richmond, Virginia
    Chen, Xueming
    BUILDING RESILIENT CITIES IN CHINA: THE NEXUS BETWEEN PLANNING AND SCIENCE, 2015, 113 : 21 - 32
  • [37] A Simulation Sandbox to Compare Fixed-Route, Semi-flexible Transit, and On-demand Microtransit System Designs
    Gyugeun Yoon
    Joseph Y. J. Chow
    Srushti Rath
    KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2022, 26 : 3043 - 3062
  • [38] A Simulation Sandbox to Compare Fixed-Route, Semi-flexible Transit, and On-demand Microtransit System Designs
    Yoon, Gyugeun
    Chow, Joseph Y. J.
    Rath, Srushti
    KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (07) : 3043 - 3062
  • [39] Mobility-on-demand versus fixed-route transit systems: An evaluation of traveler preferences in low-income communities
    Yan, Xiang
    Zhao, Xilei
    Han, Yuan
    Van Hentenryck, Pascal
    Dillahunt, Tawanna
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2021, 148 : 481 - 495
  • [40] Bringing fixed-route transit service to small cities and towns - Potential contribution of existing demand-response brokerages
    O'Connell, L
    Siria, B
    Grossardt, T
    TRANSIT: BUSES, PARATRANSIT, RURAL PUBLIC BUSES, AND INTERCITY TRANSIT; NEW TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY: CAPACITY AND QUALITY OF SERVICE: PUBLIC TRANSIT, 2002, (1791): : 72 - 77