Evaluation of bowel preparation regimens for colonoscopy including a novel low volume regimen (Plenvu): CLEANSE study

被引:3
|
作者
Ahmad, Ahmir [1 ]
Marshall, Sarah [1 ]
Bassett, Paul [2 ]
Thiruvilangam, Kowshika [1 ]
Dhillon, Angad [3 ]
Saunders, Brian P. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marks Hosp, Wolfson Unit Endoscopy, London, England
[2] Statsconsultancy Ltd, Amersham, England
[3] Lewisham & Greenwich NHS Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2023年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
colonoscopy; endoscopy; diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy; ADENOMA MISS RATES; CECAL INTUBATION; QUALITY; IMPACT; TIME; PREDICTORS; EFFICIENCY; BARRIERS; SCALE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgast-2022-001070
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPoor bowel preparation is the leading cause of failed colonoscopies and increases costs significantly. Several, split preparation, 2 day regimens are available and recently, Plenvu, a low-volume preparation which can be given on 1 day has been introduced.AimsAssess efficacy and tolerability of commonly used purgative regimens including Plenvu.MethodIn this service evaluation, patients undergoing screening colonoscopy at St Mark's Hospital, London (February 2020-December 2021) were provided Plenvu (1 or 2 days), Moviprep (2 days) or Senna & Citramag (2 days).Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, fluid volumes and procedure times were recorded. A patient experience questionnaire evaluated taste, volume acceptability, completion and side effects.Results563 patients were invited to participate and 553 included: 218 Moviprep 2 days, 108 Senna & Citramag 2 days, 152 Plenvu 2 days and 75 Plenvu 1 day.BBPS scores were higher with Plenvu 1 and 2 days vs Senna & Citramag (p=0.003 and 0.002, respectively) and vs Moviprep (p=0.003 and 0.001, respectively). No other significant pairwise BBPS differences and no difference in preparation adequacy was seen between the groups.Patients rated taste as most pleasant with Senna & Citramag and this achieved significance versus Plenvu 1 day and 2 days (p=0.002 and p<0.001, respectively) and versus Moviprep (p=0.04).ConclusionBBPS score was higher for 1 day and 2 days Plenvu versus both Senna & Citramag and Moviprep. Taste was not highly rated for Plenvu but it appears to offer effective cleansing even when given as a same day preparation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Comparison of Low Versus High Volume Bowel Preparation Efficacy and Tolerability for Colonoscopy: A Quality Improvement Study.
    Bushyhead, Daniel
    Tiritilli, Amelie
    Dominitz, Jason A.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 159 (02) : E25 - E26
  • [23] Impact of high-volume, intermediate-volume and low-volume bowel preparation on colonoscopy quality and patient satisfaction: An observational study
    Waldmann, E.
    Penz, D.
    Majcher, B.
    Zagata, J.
    Sinkovec, H.
    Heinze, G.
    Dokladanska, A.
    Szymanska, A.
    Trauner, M.
    Ferlitsch, A.
    Ferlitsch, M.
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 7 (01) : 114 - 124
  • [24] COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT BOWEL PREPARATION REGIMENS FOR COLONOSCOPY: A SINGLE-CENTRE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
    Messina, O.
    Franceschi, M.
    Tomba, F.
    Ferronato, A.
    Sella, D.
    Cocco, A.
    Migliorini, S.
    Mosele, M.
    Rosa, L.
    Salin, E.
    Vidale, M.
    Vanzetto, E.
    Toffanin, R.
    Baldassarre, G.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2016, 48 : E211 - E211
  • [25] A Multi-Center Study Looking At the Efficacy of Different Bowel Preparation Regimens for Colonoscopy in the Elderly
    Patel, Kinesh P.
    Patel, Nisha
    Bansi, Devinder S.
    Greenfield, Simon M.
    McIntyre, Peter
    Morris, Danielle
    Samsheer, Kote
    Thillainayagam, Andrew V.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB218 - AB218
  • [26] PROSPECTIVE PRE-COLONOSCOPY BOWEL PREPARATION STUDY COMPARING NOVEL CAPSULE BOWEL PREPARATION (CBP) VS HIGH VOLUME POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION VS LOW VOLUME POLYETHYLENE GLYCOL ELECTROLYTE SOLUTION
    Kingston-Smith, Harriet
    Borody, Thomas J.
    Saxon, John
    Ramrakha, Sanjay
    Dawson, Vic
    Clancy, Annabel
    Wettstein, Antony
    Benstock, Simon
    Vivekanandarajah, Suhirdan
    Agrawal, Gaurav
    Yusuf, Anise
    Mills, Justine
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S808 - S809
  • [27] Feasibility of a novel low-volume and sodium phosphate-free bowel preparation regimen for colon capsule endoscopy
    Zhou, Jieqiong
    Tang, Xiaowei
    Wang, Jing
    Chen, Zhenyu
    Wang, Xinying
    Jiang, Bo
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2017, 14 (02) : 1739 - 1743
  • [28] High volume, low volume, or pills, which way should we go? a review of bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Haydel, Jasmine M.
    Xu, Anthony A.
    Mansour, Nabil M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 40 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [29] The optimal bowel preparation intervals before colonoscopy: A randomized study comparing polyethylene glycol and low-volume solutions
    Kojecky, Vladimir
    Matous, Jan
    Keil, Radan
    Dastych, Milan
    Zadorova, Zdena
    Varga, Michal
    Kroupa, Radek
    Dolina, Jiri
    Misurec, Miroslav
    Hep, Ales
    Griva, Martin
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2018, 50 (03) : 271 - 276
  • [30] A comparative study of low-volume bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy; sodium picosulfate versus peg-asc
    Jeen, Yoon Tae
    Yoo, In Kyung
    Lee, Jae Min
    Kim, Seung Han
    Nam, Seung Joo
    Choi, Hyuk Soon
    Kim, Eun Sun
    Keum, Bora
    Lee, Hong Sik
    Chun, Hoon Jai
    Kim, Chang Duck
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 81 - 81