Breast cancer risk factors and mammographic density among 12518 average-risk women in rural China

被引:5
|
作者
Yan, Huijiao [1 ]
Ren, Wenhui [2 ]
Jia, Mengmeng [1 ]
Xue, Peng [1 ]
Li, Zhifang [3 ]
Zhang, Shaokai [4 ,5 ]
He, Lichun [6 ]
Qiao, Youlin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Sch Populat Med & Publ Hlth, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[3] Changzhi Med Coll, Changzhi 046000, Shanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Zhengzhou Univ, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Dept Canc Epidemiol, Zhengzhou 450008, Peoples R China
[5] Henan Canc Hosp, Henan Engn Res Ctr Canc Prevent & Control, Henan Int Joint Lab Canc Prevent, Zhengzhou 450008, Peoples R China
[6] Mianyang Childrens Hosp, Mianyang Maternal & Child Hlth Care Hosp, Mianyang 621000, Peoples R China
关键词
Mammographic density; Risk factor; Breast cancer; BODY-MASS INDEX; REPRODUCTIVE FACTORS; ETHNIC-DIFFERENCES; ASSOCIATION; POPULATIONS; PATTERNS; ALCOHOL; MODEL; SIZE;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-023-11444-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundMammographic density (MD) is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. We aimed to evaluate the association between MD and breast cancer related risk factors among average-risk women in rural China.MethodsThis is a population-based screening study. 12518 women aged 45-64 years with complete MD data from three maternal and childcare hospitals in China were included in the final analysis. ORs and 95%CIs were estimated using generalized logit model by comparing each higher MD (BI-RADS b, c, d) to the lowest group (BI-RADS a). The cumulative logistic regression model was used to estimate the ORtrend (95%CI) and Ptrend by treating MD as an ordinal variable.ResultsOlder age (ORtrend = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.79-0.81, per 2-year increase), higher BMI (ORtrend = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.71-0.75, per 2 kg/m2), more births (ORtrend = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.41-0.54, 3 + vs. 0-1), postmenopausal status (ORtrend = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.38-0.46) were associated with lower MD. For parous women, longer duration of breastfeeding was found to be associated with higher MD when adjusting for study site, age, BMI, and age of first full-term birth (ORtrend = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.27-1.85, 25 + months vs. no breastfeeding; ORtrend = 1.45, 95%CI: 1.20-1.75, 19-24 months vs. no breastfeeding), however, the association became non-significant when adjusting all covariates. Associations between examined risk factors and MD were similar in premenopausal and postmenopausal women except for level of education and oral hormone drug usage. Higher education was only found to be associated with an increased proportion of dense breasts in postmenopausal women (ORtrend = 1.08, 95%CI: 1.02-1.15). Premenopausal women who ever used oral hormone drug were less likely to have dense breasts, though the difference was marginally significant (OR = 0.54, P = 0.045). In postmenopausal women, we also found the proportion of dense breasts increased with age at menopause (ORtrend = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.21-1.43).ConclusionsIn Chinese women with average risk for breast cancer, we found MD was associated with age, BMI, menopausal status, lactation, and age at menopausal. This finding may help to understand the etiology of breast cancer and have implications for breast cancer prevention in China.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cervical Cancer Screening in Average-Risk Women
    不详
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 162 (12) : 28 - 28
  • [22] Utility of using mammographic density and clinical risk factors to identify higher risk women in an average-risk screening cohort. What is necessary? What is sufficient?
    Abdolell, Mohamed
    Tsuruda, Kaitlyn
    Payne, Jennifer
    Brown, Peter
    Caines, Judy
    Iles, Sian
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 19
  • [23] Mammographic Breast Density and Risk Factors of Breast Cancer in Korean Women Using Multicenter Study
    Cho, Jung Jin
    Song, Hong Ji
    Koh, En Young
    Song, Yun Mi
    Han, Boo Kyung
    Yun, Young Sook
    Park, Hyun Ah
    Lee, Sung Hee
    Yang, Jeong Hee
    Han, Heon
    Seo, Young Ran
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2006, 27 (01): : 33 - 41
  • [24] Temporal changes in mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk among women with benign breast disease
    Mullooly, Maeve
    Fan, Shaoqi
    Pfeiffer, Ruth M.
    Bowles, Erin Aiello
    Duggan, Maire A.
    Falk, Roni T.
    Richert-Boe, Kathryn
    Glass, Andrew G.
    Kimes, Teresa M.
    Figueroa, Jonine D.
    Rohan, Thomas E.
    Abubakar, Mustapha
    Gierach, Gretchen L.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (01)
  • [25] Mammographic Breast Density and Risk of Ovarian Cancer in Korean Women
    Tran, Thi Xuan Mai
    Kim, Soyeoun
    Park, Boyoung
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2023, 32 (12) : 1690 - 1698
  • [26] Temporal changes in mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk among women with benign breast disease
    Mullooly, Maeve
    Fan, Shaoqi
    Pfeiffer, Ruth M.
    Bowles, Erin Aiello
    Duggan, Maire A.
    Falk, Roni T.
    Richert-Boe, Kathryn
    Kimes, Terry
    Figueroa, Jonine D.
    Rohan, Thomas E.
    Abubakar, Mustapha
    Gierach, Gretchen L.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2023, 83 (07)
  • [27] Mammographic density and the risk of, breast cancer in Korean women.
    Shin, MH
    Han, BK
    Nam, SJ
    Yang, JH
    Byrne, C
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 157 (11) : S40 - S40
  • [28] Temporal changes in mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk among women with benign breast disease
    Maeve Mullooly
    Shaoqi Fan
    Ruth M. Pfeiffer
    Erin Aiello Bowles
    Máire A. Duggan
    Roni T. Falk
    Kathryn Richert-Boe
    Andrew G. Glass
    Teresa M. Kimes
    Jonine D. Figueroa
    Thomas E. Rohan
    Mustapha Abubakar
    Gretchen L. Gierach
    Breast Cancer Research, 26
  • [29] Mammographic density and breast cancer risk
    Boyd, NF
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2004, 88 : S3 - S3
  • [30] Mammographic density and breast cancer risk
    van Gils, CH
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1999, 86 (02) : 127 - 128