Comparative life cycle environmental, exergteic, and economic assessment of three hydrocarbon-based ethylene production routes

被引:20
|
作者
Ye, Zhencheng [1 ]
Han, Xiao [1 ]
Hu, Guihua [1 ]
Zhao, Liang [1 ]
机构
[1] East China Univ Sci & Technol, Key Lab Smart Mfg Energy Chem Proc, Minist Educ, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Exergetic life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Hydrocarbon-based ethylene production; High-quality development; WET SHALE GAS; CONSEQUENTIAL LCA; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSUMPTION; CRACKING; BIOMASS; OLEFINS; SYSTEMS; YIELD; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126359
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Currently and in the foreseeable future, steam cracking with sequential cryogenic separation, steam cracking with de-ethanization cryogenic separation (SC-DES), and steam cracking with de-propanization cryogenic sep-aration are the primary ethylene production routes in China. In the era of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, academia and industry focus on the high-quality development of manufacturing. In this study, a general framework integrating life cycle assessment (LCA), exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA), and life cycle costing (LCC) was constructed to compare the comprehensive performance of three routes systematically. Furthermore, the model of the foreground process was developed by COILSIMID and Aspen Plus with two typical cracking feedstocks, naphtha and LPG. Based on these, eleven significant indicators from the LCA, ELCA, and LCC inte-grating framework were calculated to reflect the production performance from environmental, exergetic, and economic perspectives in three ethylene production routes. The results indicated that the overall categories of the SC-DES route are better than the other two routes, but a few indicators lack competitiveness. Since no route showed excellent performance in all indicators, it was not easy to declare that a certain path has the best sus-tainable performance. However, decision-makers can utilize the obtained results to make optimal decisions beneficial to industrial ethylene production.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Development of a BIM -based Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Assessment tool
    Santos, Ruben
    Costa, Antonio Aguiar
    Silvestre, Jose D.
    Pyl, Lincy
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 265
  • [12] Assessing the economic and environmental impact of jasmine rice production: Life cycle assessment and Life Cycle Costs analysis
    Jirapornvaree, Ittisak
    Suppadit, Tawadchai
    Kumar, Vikas
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 303
  • [13] Comparative economic and life cycle assessment of solar-based hydrogen production for oil and gas industries
    Sadeghi, Shayan
    Ghandehariun, Samane
    Rosen, Marc A.
    ENERGY, 2020, 208 (208)
  • [14] Decarbonization approaches for ethylene production: comparative techno-economic and life-cycle analysis
    Shin, Woojae
    Lin, Bosong
    Lai, Haoxiang
    Ibrahim, Gasim
    Zang, Guiyan
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2025, 27 (14)
  • [15] Comparative exergy and economic assessment of fossil and biomass-based routes for ammonia production
    Florez-Orrego, Daniel
    Marechal, Francois
    de Oliveira Junior, Silvio
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 194 : 22 - 36
  • [16] Life cycle assessment of corn- and cassava-based ethylene production
    Hong, Jinglan
    Zhang, Yanlu
    Xu, Xu
    Li, Xiangzhi
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 67 : 304 - 311
  • [17] Environmental sustainability improvement in chloromethanes production based on life cycle assessment
    Zhou, Xinying
    Cheng, Ziyue
    Ren, Ke
    Zhai, Yijie
    Zhang, Tianzuo
    Shen, Xiaoxu
    Bai, Yueyang
    Jia, Yuke
    Hong, Jinglan
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 34 : 105 - 113
  • [18] Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of ceramic tile production: A case study in China
    Ye, Liping
    Hong, Jinglan
    Ma, Xiaotian
    Qi, Congcong
    Yang, Donglu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 189 : 432 - 441
  • [19] Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Cellulose Nanofibres Production Routes from Virgin and Recycled Raw Materials
    Gallo Stampino, Paola
    Riva, Laura
    Punta, Carlo
    Elegir, Graziano
    Bussini, Daniele
    Dotelli, Giovanni
    MOLECULES, 2021, 26 (09):
  • [20] Jamaican bioethanol: an environmental and economic life cycle assessment
    E. Batuecas
    R. Contreras-Lisperguer
    C. Mayo
    R. Díaz
    C. Springer
    F. J. Pérez
    Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2021, 23 : 1415 - 1430