Significance of serum AMH and antral follicle count discrepancy for the prediction of ovarian stimulation response in Poseidon criteria patients

被引:1
|
作者
Hochberg, Alyssa [1 ,2 ]
Dahan, Michael H. [1 ]
Yarali, Hakan [3 ,4 ]
Vuong, Lan N. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Esteves, Sandro C. [8 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 845 Rue Sherbrooke O, Montreal, PQ 3HA 0G4, Canada
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Anatolia IVF, Ankara, Turkiye
[4] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ankara, Turkiye
[5] Univ Med & Pharm Ho Chi Minh City, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[6] My Duc Hosp, IVFMD, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[7] My Duc Hosp, HOPE Res Ctr, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[8] ANDROFERT Androl & Human Reprod Clin, Campinas, Brazil
关键词
Ovarian stimulation; Anti-Mullerian hormone; Antral follicle count; Discordancy; Poor ovarian response; Poseidon criteria; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; HIGHLY PURIFIED HMG; RECOMBINANT FSH; ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE; IVF; HYPERSTIMULATION; VARIABILITY; CYCLE;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-024-03050-8
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose To determine the risk of not being a poor responder in ovarian stimulation (OS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF) when ovarian reserve markers are discordant-one falling within Poseidon's criteria normal range (e.g., anti-M & uuml;llerian hormone (AMH) >= 1.2 ng/mL or antral follicle count (AFC) >= 5), and the other in the poor ovarian reserve range. Methods A tri-center retrospective cohort study (2015-2017) involving women with discordant AMH and AFC values undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle using conventional OS (cOS, >= 150 IU/day of follicle-stimulating hormone). Discordant serum AMH and AFC values were defined according to Poseidon's criteria (AMH < 1.2 ng/mL and AFC >= 5 or AMH >= 1.2 ng/mL and AFC < 5). Poor ovarian response (POR) was < 4 retrieved oocytes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine AMH and AFC cut-offs for non-POR. Logistic regression analysis evaluated factors associated with non-POR. Results Out of 8797 patients who underwent assessment with both AMH and AFC, 1172 (13.3%) exhibited discordant values. Of these, 854 (72.9%) had >= 4 oocytes retrieved. Within this group, 726 (85.0%) had "low" AMH values, whereas 128 (15.0%) had "low" AFCs. An AFC of 6 had 77% sensitivity and 52% specificity (AUC = 0.700), while AMH of 1.19 ng/mL had 31% sensitivity and 85% specificity (AUC = 0.492) for non-POR. AFC and the use of recombinant gonadotropins were positive predictors of non-POR. Conclusions When serum AMH is < 1.19 ng/mL, but AFC is >= 6, there is a moderate likelihood of a non-POR during stimulation. Conversely, if AFC is < 5 but serum AMH is >= 1.19 ng/mL, the chances of non-POR are low. Among patients with discordant markers, AFC emerges as the primary predictor of oocyte yield.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 726
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients: a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count
    Hendriks, Dave J.
    Kwee, Janet
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    te Velde, Egbert R.
    Broekmans, Frank J. M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 87 (04) : 764 - 775
  • [32] WHICH IS MORE PREDICTIVE OVARIAN RESERVE MARKER WHEN THERE IS DISCORDANCE BETWEEN ANTI - MULLERIAN HORMONE AND ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT IN PATIENTS WITH DIMINISHED OVARIAN RESERVE, AMH OR AFC?.
    Aslan, Kiper
    Kasapoglu, Isil
    Koc, Meltem
    Kuspinar, Goktan
    Avci, Berrin
    Uncu, Gurkan
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E463 - E464
  • [33] THE RATIO AMH/ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT VARIES ACCORDING TO THE ETIOLOGIES OF DIMINISHED OVARIAN RESERVE SUGGESTING DIFFERENCES IN FOLLICULAR HEALTH.
    Grynberg, Michael
    Sellami, Ines
    Benoit, Alexandra
    Sermondade, Nathalie
    Sonigo, Charlotte
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (03) : E109 - E109
  • [34] Antral follicle count and FSH concentration after clomiphene citrate challenge test in the prediction of ovarian response during IVF treatment
    Ng, EHY
    Chan, CCW
    Tang, OS
    Ho, PC
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (06) : 1647 - 1654
  • [35] Comparison of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count in the prediction of ovarian response: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Yang
    Pan, Zhengmei
    Wu, Yanzhi
    Song, Jiamei
    Chen, Jingsi
    JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (01)
  • [36] INDIVIDUAL IVF CLINIC PERFORMANCE OF ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE AND ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT AS BIOMARKERS OF OVARIAN RESPONSE TO CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION IN MULTICENTRE TRIALS
    Nelson, S.
    Arce, J. -C.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 102 (03) : E147 - E147
  • [37] Antral follicle count on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in IVF
    Peralta, S.
    Fabregues, F.
    Penarrubia, J.
    Casals, G.
    Creus, M.
    Manau, D.
    Gonzalez, I.
    Borras, A.
    Carmona, F.
    Balasch, J.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 : 309 - 309
  • [38] SERUM BIOMARKERS OF OVARIAN AGING BUT NOT ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT VARY WITH BMI: IS AFC A MORE VERSATILE MARKER OF OVARIAN AGING?
    Pittenger, S. R.
    Sternfeld, B.
    Reijo-Pera, R. A.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 98 (03) : S84 - S84
  • [39] Interactions between serum FSH, inhibin B and antral follicle count in the decline of serum AMH during the menstrual cycle in late reproductive age
    Robertson, David M.
    Lee, Chel Hee
    Baerwald, Angela
    ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2021, 4 (02)
  • [40] What threshold values of antral follicle count and serum AMH levels should be considered for oocyte cryopreservation after in vitro maturation?
    Sonigo, C.
    Simon, C.
    Boubaya, M.
    Benoit, A.
    Sifer, C.
    Sermondade, N.
    Grynberg, M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2016, 31 (07) : 1493 - 1500