Significance of serum AMH and antral follicle count discrepancy for the prediction of ovarian stimulation response in Poseidon criteria patients

被引:1
|
作者
Hochberg, Alyssa [1 ,2 ]
Dahan, Michael H. [1 ]
Yarali, Hakan [3 ,4 ]
Vuong, Lan N. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Esteves, Sandro C. [8 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 845 Rue Sherbrooke O, Montreal, PQ 3HA 0G4, Canada
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Anatolia IVF, Ankara, Turkiye
[4] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ankara, Turkiye
[5] Univ Med & Pharm Ho Chi Minh City, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[6] My Duc Hosp, IVFMD, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[7] My Duc Hosp, HOPE Res Ctr, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[8] ANDROFERT Androl & Human Reprod Clin, Campinas, Brazil
关键词
Ovarian stimulation; Anti-Mullerian hormone; Antral follicle count; Discordancy; Poor ovarian response; Poseidon criteria; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; HIGHLY PURIFIED HMG; RECOMBINANT FSH; ANTIMULLERIAN HORMONE; IVF; HYPERSTIMULATION; VARIABILITY; CYCLE;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-024-03050-8
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose To determine the risk of not being a poor responder in ovarian stimulation (OS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF) when ovarian reserve markers are discordant-one falling within Poseidon's criteria normal range (e.g., anti-M & uuml;llerian hormone (AMH) >= 1.2 ng/mL or antral follicle count (AFC) >= 5), and the other in the poor ovarian reserve range. Methods A tri-center retrospective cohort study (2015-2017) involving women with discordant AMH and AFC values undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle using conventional OS (cOS, >= 150 IU/day of follicle-stimulating hormone). Discordant serum AMH and AFC values were defined according to Poseidon's criteria (AMH < 1.2 ng/mL and AFC >= 5 or AMH >= 1.2 ng/mL and AFC < 5). Poor ovarian response (POR) was < 4 retrieved oocytes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine AMH and AFC cut-offs for non-POR. Logistic regression analysis evaluated factors associated with non-POR. Results Out of 8797 patients who underwent assessment with both AMH and AFC, 1172 (13.3%) exhibited discordant values. Of these, 854 (72.9%) had >= 4 oocytes retrieved. Within this group, 726 (85.0%) had "low" AMH values, whereas 128 (15.0%) had "low" AFCs. An AFC of 6 had 77% sensitivity and 52% specificity (AUC = 0.700), while AMH of 1.19 ng/mL had 31% sensitivity and 85% specificity (AUC = 0.492) for non-POR. AFC and the use of recombinant gonadotropins were positive predictors of non-POR. Conclusions When serum AMH is < 1.19 ng/mL, but AFC is >= 6, there is a moderate likelihood of a non-POR during stimulation. Conversely, if AFC is < 5 but serum AMH is >= 1.19 ng/mL, the chances of non-POR are low. Among patients with discordant markers, AFC emerges as the primary predictor of oocyte yield.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 726
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Significance of serum AMH and antral follicle count discrepancy for the prediction of ovarian stimulation response in Poseidon criteria patients
    Alyssa Hochberg
    Michael H. Dahan
    Hakan Yarali
    Lan N. Vuong
    Sandro C. Esteves
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2024, 41 : 717 - 726
  • [2] Multicenter evaluation of the Access AMH antimullerian hormone assay for the prediction of antral follicle count and poor ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation
    Baker, Valerie L.
    Gracia, Clarisa
    Glassner, Michael J.
    Schnell, Vicki L.
    Doody, Kevin
    Coddington, Charles C.
    Shin, Sanghyuk S.
    Marshall, Lorna A.
    Alper, Michael M.
    Morales, Arlene J.
    Pavone, Mary Ellen
    Behera, Millie A.
    Zbella, Edward A.
    Shapiro, Bruce S.
    Straseski, Joely A.
    Broyles, Dennis L.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (03) : 506 - +
  • [3] The significance of antral follicle count in controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination
    Ng, EHY
    Yeung, WSB
    Ho, PC
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2005, 22 (9-10) : 323 - 328
  • [4] The significance of antral follicle count in controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination
    Ernest Hung Yu Ng
    William Shu Biu Yeung
    Pak Chung Ho
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2005, 22 : 323 - 328
  • [5] Combining cycle day 7 follicle count with the basal antral follicle count improves the prediction of ovarian response
    Durmusoglu, F
    Elter, K
    Yoruk, P
    Erenus, M
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (04) : 1073 - 1078
  • [6] Antral follicle count at down-regulation and prediction of poor ovarian response
    Khairy, Mohammed
    Clough, Angela
    El-Toukhy, Tarek
    Coomarasamy, Arri
    Khalaf, Yakoub
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 17 (04) : 508 - 514
  • [7] Anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count for prediction of ovarian stimulation response in polycystic ovary syndrome
    El-Mazny, Akmal
    Abou-Salem, Nermeen
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2013, 29 (09) : 826 - 829
  • [8] THE ROLE OF ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE MEASUREMENT IN THE PREDICTION OF RESPONSE TO CONTROLLED OVARIAN STIMULATION: COMPARISON WITH THE ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT
    Habara, T.
    Hirata, R.
    Aoi, Y.
    Terada, S.
    Yoshioka, N.
    Hayashi, N.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 96 (03) : S198 - S199
  • [9] Should serum anti-Mllerian hormone (AMH) or antral follicle count (AFC) be used for prediction of oocyte yield in patients with AMH-AFC discordances
    Alebic, M. S.
    Stojanovic, N.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 : 335 - 336
  • [10] Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation improves predictive markers for diminished ovarian reserve: serum AMH, inhibin B and antral follicle count
    Yilmaz, N.
    Uygur, D.
    Inal, H.
    Gorkem, U.
    Cicek, N.
    Mollamahmutoglu, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 169 (02) : 257 - 260