Protection-interdiction-restoration for resilient multi-commodity networks

被引:6
|
作者
Kuttler, Emma [1 ]
Ghorbani-Renani, Nafiseh [2 ]
Barker, Kash [1 ]
Gonzalez, Andres D. [1 ]
Johansson, Jonas [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] Stevens Inst Technol, Sch Syst & Enterprises, Hoboken, NJ USA
[3] Lund Univ, Div Risk Management & Societal Safety, Lund, Sweden
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Network protection and interdiction; Resilience; Tri-level optimization; Critical infrastructure systems; Multi-commodity; Decomposition; COMPONENT IMPORTANCE; SYSTEM; INFRASTRUCTURE; OPTIMIZATION; MODELS; FORMULATION; RESOURCES; FRAMEWORK; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2023.109745
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Interdependent critical infrastructure systems represent substantial financial investments and are vital to maintain a fundamental level of social and economic well-being, making them attractive targets for malevolent actors. Many of these infrastructure systems carry multiple products, each with unique needs and importance to different stakeholders. This work extends a tri-level protection-interdiction-restoration model from a single commodity to multiple commodities, solving the model with an integration of Benders' decomposition and set covering decomposition. We propose a method to limit unmet weighted demand across commodities, considering unique interdependencies between network components and commodity-specific capacity requirements. An optimal solution is found iteratively by alternately fixing protection and interdiction variables. This work is illustrated with a case study of interdependent Swedish power and multi-commodity railway systems. Results demonstrate the convergent behavior of the master and subproblems, the value of network hardening, and the non-uniform network recovery trajectory. For the case study, the railway system was more vulnerable to disruption than the power system, making it a more attractive target for both protection and interdiction. The components that were commonly selected as part of a protection or interdiction plan were generally the ones with the greatest demand for iron ore, a highly critical commodity.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A NOTE ON THE MULTI-COMMODITY WAREHOUSE PROBLEM
    EASTMAN, WL
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1959, 5 (03) : 327 - 331
  • [22] THE MULTI-COMMODITY FACILITIES LOCATION PROBLEM
    KARKAZIS, J
    BOFFEY, TB
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1981, 32 (09) : 803 - 814
  • [23] Uniform multi-commodity flow in wireless networks with Gaussian fading channels
    Leveque, Oliver
    Madan, Ritesh
    Shah, Devavrat
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION THEORY, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 1846 - +
  • [24] A Multi-Commodity Flow Model for Integrated Design and Routing in Intelligent Networks
    Balma, Ali
    Hadj-Alouane, Atidel B.
    Ben Hadj-Alouane, Nejib
    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (IESM'2011): INNOVATIVE APPROACHES AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR NETWORKED MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES MANAGEMENT, 2011, : 1271 - 1279
  • [25] ANALYSIS OF A SYSTEM OF NONLOCAL CONSERVATION LAWS FOR MULTI-COMMODITY FLOW ON NETWORKS
    Gugat, Martin
    Keimer, Alexander
    Leugering, Guenter
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    NETWORKS AND HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA, 2015, 10 (04) : 749 - 785
  • [26] A novel method for solving the multi-commodity flow problem on evolving networks
    Fan, Huilong
    Sun, Chongxiang
    Long, Jun
    Wang, Shangpeng
    Zeng, Fei
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2024, 247
  • [27] POWER AND TAXES IN A MULTI-COMMODITY ECONOMY
    AUMANN, RJ
    KURZ, M
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 1977, 27 (3-4) : 185 - 234
  • [28] OPTIMUM TARIFFS IN A MULTI-COMMODITY FRAMEWORK
    GHOSH, DK
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1979, 46 (02) : 502 - 512
  • [29] MULTI-COMMODITY APPROACH TO INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
    WASSERMANN, U
    JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE, 1975, 9 (04) : 463 - 467
  • [30] Reliability Aspects of Multi-commodity Markets
    Malinowski, Jacek
    MODELING MULTI-COMMODITY TRADE: INFORMATION EXCHANGE METHODS, 2012, 121 : 113 - 125