共 50 条
Safety and efficacy of the feed additive 4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole [15.018] belonging to chemical group 29 for all animal species (FEFANA asbl)
被引:0
|作者:
Bampidis, Vasileios
Azimonti, Giovanna
Bastos, Maria de Lourdes
Christensen, Henrik
Durjava, Mojca
Kouba, Maryline
Lopez-Alonso, Marta
Lopez Puente, Secundino
Marcon, Francesca
Mayo, Baltasar
Pechova, Alena
Petkova, Mariana
Ramos, Fernando
Sanz, Yolanda
Villa, Roberto Edoardo
Woutersen, Ruud
Brantom, Paul
Chesson, Andrew
Westendorf, Johannes
Manini, Paola
Dusemund, Birgit
机构:
关键词:
sensory additives;
feed flavourings;
thiazoles;
thiophene and thiazoline;
4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole;
safety;
efficacy;
GUIDANCE;
D O I:
10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8051
中图分类号:
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号:
0832 ;
摘要:
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of 4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole [15.018] belonging to chemical group 29 (thiazoles, thiophene and thiazoline), when used as sensory additive (flavourings) in feed for all animal species. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that 4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole [15.018] was safe at the maximum proposed use level of 0.5 mg/kg complete feed for veal calves (milk replacer), dogs, salmonids and ornamental fish. For the other species, the calculated safe concentrations in complete feed are: 0.4 mg/kg for cattle for fattening, sheep/goat, horses and cats; 0.3 mg/kg for sows and dairy cows; 0.2 mg/kg for piglets, pigs for fattening, rabbits and laying hens; and 0.1 mg/kg for chickens for fattening and turkeys for fattening. These conclusions were extrapolated to other physiologically related species. For any other species, the additive was considered safe at 0.1 mg/kg complete feed. No safety concern would arise for the consumer from the use the additive up to the maximum proposed use level in feed. The additive should be considered as irritant to skin and eyes and the respiratory tract, and as dermal and respiratory sensitisers. The use of 4-methyl-5-vinylthiazole [15.018] as a flavour in animal feed was not expected to pose a risk to the environment. Since the compound under assessment is used in food as flavouring and its function in feed is essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy was considered necessary.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文