Patient preferences for attributes of injected or infused preventive migraine medications: Findings from a discrete choice experiment

被引:8
|
作者
Schwedt, Todd J. [1 ]
Martin, Ashley [2 ]
Kymes, Steven [3 ,7 ]
Talon, Brian [3 ]
Lee, Xin Ying [4 ]
Cady, Roger [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Asher, Divya [3 ]
Karnik-Henry, Meghana [3 ]
Mulvihill, Emily [2 ]
Bates, Dawn [2 ]
Beusterien, Kathleen [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Cerner Enviza, Kansas City, MO USA
[3] Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL USA
[4] H Lundbeck A S, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] RK Consults, Ozark, MO USA
[6] Missouri State Univ, Springfield, MO USA
[7] Lundbeck LLC, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, 6 Pkwy North, Deerfield, IL 60015 USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2023年 / 63卷 / 04期
关键词
discrete choice experiment; migraine; patient preference; preventive treatment;
D O I
10.1111/head.14476
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess preferences among adults with migraine for differentiating attributes of injected or infused preventive treatment options and evaluate their importance in determining a treatment choice.Background: Adults with migraine and health-care providers consider many factors when making treatment decisions. Injected or infused preventive migraine treatment options differ in several attributes, including mode of administration and dosing frequency, which may be preferentially selected or avoided by patients. Understanding a patient's preference is important for clinicians as they advise on various treatment options.Methods: A total of 604 US adults diagnosed with migraine participated in an online survey that captured information on demographics, migraine history, and treatment preferences. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to evaluate participants' preferences for specific attributes of injected/infused preventive migraine therapies. The DCE data were utilized to estimate attribute importance (expressed as a percentage) and identify subgroups that had different distributions of preferences.Results: In the overall migraine population, mode of administration (28.8%), durability of effectiveness (27.0%), and speed of onset (25.5%) had the highest relative importance, whereas administration setting (9.9%) and dosing frequency (8.8%) had the lowest. Four distinct subgroups were identified: Group 1 (n = 128) preferred self-injection administration and durability of effectiveness; Group 2 (n = 189) expressed aversion to cranial injections; Group 3 (n = 158) prioritized rapid speed of onset; and Group 4 (n = 129) favored health-care provider administration and durability of effectiveness.Conclusions: Speed of onset, durability of effectiveness, and mode of administration are key moderators of treatment preference among US adults with migraine. Certain segments of the migraine population prioritize specific treatment attributes over others, with intravenous infusion not considered a barrier in three of four identified segments. Clinicians can best help their patients find the right medication if they understand which medication attributes are most and least important to them.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 493
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient Preferences for Attributes that Characterise Alternative Models of Care in Gastroenterology: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Rumbidzai N. Mutsekwa
    Katrina L. Campbell
    Russell Canavan
    Brendan Mulhern
    Rebecca L. Angus
    Joshua M. Byrnes
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2023, 16 : 165 - 177
  • [22] Patient Preferences for Attributes that Characterise Alternative Models of Care in Gastroenterology: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Mutsekwa, Rumbidzai N.
    Campbell, Katrina L.
    Canavan, Russell
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Angus, Rebecca L.
    Byrnes, Joshua M.
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (02): : 165 - 177
  • [23] Patient Preferences for Attributes of Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer: Discrete Choice Experiment Study in Japan
    Sugitani, Yasuo
    Ito, Kyoko
    Ono, Shunsuke
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [24] Patient preferences for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors in the preventive treatment of migraine: A discrete choice experiment in the US and Germany
    Hubig, L.
    Smith, T. R.
    Powell, L. C.
    Johnson, K. M.
    Harris, L.
    Litalien, G. J.
    Chua, G.
    Coric, V.
    Lloyd, A.
    Lo, S.
    HEADACHE, 2022, 62 : 75 - 76
  • [25] Patient Preferences in Surveillance: Findings From a Discrete Choice Experiment in the "My Follow-Up" Study
    McFerran, Ethna
    Boeri, Marco
    Kee, Frank
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 (10) : 1373 - 1383
  • [26] Patient and nurse preferences for implementation of bedside handover: Do they agree? Findings from a discrete choice experiment
    Whitty, Jennifer A.
    Spinks, Jean
    Bucknall, Tracey
    Tobiano, Georgia
    Chaboyer, Wendy
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (04) : 742 - 750
  • [27] Patient preferences for the attributes of a noninvasive treatment for superficial basal cell carcinoma: a discrete choice experiment
    Essers, B. A. B.
    Arits, A. H.
    Hendriks, M. R.
    Mosterd, K.
    Kelleners-Smeets, N. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 178 (01) : E26 - E27
  • [28] Patient Preferences for Attributes of Biologic Treatments in Moderate to Severe Asthma: A Discrete Choice Experiment Study
    Yang, Min
    Chao, Jingdong
    Fillbrunn, Mirko
    Mallya, Usha G.
    Wang, Min -Jung
    Franke, Leigh
    Cohn, Lauren
    Kamat, Siddhesh
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2022, 16 : 2649 - 2661
  • [29] PATIENT AND RHEUMATOLOGIST PREFERENCES FOR THE ATTRIBUTES OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS TREATMENTS IN SPAIN. A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Diaz, C.
    Urruticoechea, A.
    Ivorra, J.
    Diaz Cerezo, S.
    Dilla, T.
    Inciarte-Mundo, J.
    Comellas, M.
    Prades, M.
    Lizan, L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S307 - S307
  • [30] Patient preferences for treatment attributes in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a discrete choice experiment
    Feldman, Steven R.
    Guerin, Annie
    Gauthier-Loiselle, Marjolaine
    Hazra, Nisha C.
    Meng, Yan
    Gallant, Kirsten
    Claxton, Ami J.
    Balu, Sanjeev
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2024, 190 : II44 - II45