Patient preferences for attributes of injected or infused preventive migraine medications: Findings from a discrete choice experiment

被引:8
|
作者
Schwedt, Todd J. [1 ]
Martin, Ashley [2 ]
Kymes, Steven [3 ,7 ]
Talon, Brian [3 ]
Lee, Xin Ying [4 ]
Cady, Roger [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Asher, Divya [3 ]
Karnik-Henry, Meghana [3 ]
Mulvihill, Emily [2 ]
Bates, Dawn [2 ]
Beusterien, Kathleen [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Phoenix, AZ USA
[2] Cerner Enviza, Kansas City, MO USA
[3] Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL USA
[4] H Lundbeck A S, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] RK Consults, Ozark, MO USA
[6] Missouri State Univ, Springfield, MO USA
[7] Lundbeck LLC, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, 6 Pkwy North, Deerfield, IL 60015 USA
来源
HEADACHE | 2023年 / 63卷 / 04期
关键词
discrete choice experiment; migraine; patient preference; preventive treatment;
D O I
10.1111/head.14476
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To assess preferences among adults with migraine for differentiating attributes of injected or infused preventive treatment options and evaluate their importance in determining a treatment choice.Background: Adults with migraine and health-care providers consider many factors when making treatment decisions. Injected or infused preventive migraine treatment options differ in several attributes, including mode of administration and dosing frequency, which may be preferentially selected or avoided by patients. Understanding a patient's preference is important for clinicians as they advise on various treatment options.Methods: A total of 604 US adults diagnosed with migraine participated in an online survey that captured information on demographics, migraine history, and treatment preferences. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to evaluate participants' preferences for specific attributes of injected/infused preventive migraine therapies. The DCE data were utilized to estimate attribute importance (expressed as a percentage) and identify subgroups that had different distributions of preferences.Results: In the overall migraine population, mode of administration (28.8%), durability of effectiveness (27.0%), and speed of onset (25.5%) had the highest relative importance, whereas administration setting (9.9%) and dosing frequency (8.8%) had the lowest. Four distinct subgroups were identified: Group 1 (n = 128) preferred self-injection administration and durability of effectiveness; Group 2 (n = 189) expressed aversion to cranial injections; Group 3 (n = 158) prioritized rapid speed of onset; and Group 4 (n = 129) favored health-care provider administration and durability of effectiveness.Conclusions: Speed of onset, durability of effectiveness, and mode of administration are key moderators of treatment preference among US adults with migraine. Certain segments of the migraine population prioritize specific treatment attributes over others, with intravenous infusion not considered a barrier in three of four identified segments. Clinicians can best help their patients find the right medication if they understand which medication attributes are most and least important to them.
引用
收藏
页码:484 / 493
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient Preferences for Attributes of Advanced Migraine Prevention Medications: Findings from a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Schwedt, Todd J.
    Martin, Ashley
    Kymes, Steven
    Talon, Brian
    Lee, Xin Ying
    Cady, Roger
    Asher, Divya
    Karnik-Henry, Meghana
    Mulvihill, Emily
    Bates, Dawn
    Beusterien, Kathleen
    NEUROLOGY, 2023, 100 (17)
  • [2] Patient preferences for attributes of advanced migraine prevention medications: Findings from a discrete choice experiment
    Schwedt, T. J.
    Martin, A.
    Kymes, S.
    Talon, B.
    Lee, Ying X.
    Cady, R.
    Asher, D.
    Karnik-Henry, M.
    Mulvihill, E.
    Bates, D.
    Beusterien, K.
    Hallissey, B.
    HEADACHE, 2022, 62 : 75 - 75
  • [3] PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR ATTRIBUTES OF ADVANCED MIGRAINE PREVENTION MEDICATIONS: FINDINGS FROM A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Schwedt, T.
    Martin, A.
    Kymes, S.
    Talon, B.
    Lee, X. Y.
    Cady, R.
    Asher, D.
    Karnik-Henry, M.
    Mulvihill, E.
    Bates, D.
    Beusterien, K.
    Hallissey, B.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S311 - S311
  • [4] Patient Preferences for Preventive Migraine Treatments: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
    Mansfield, Carol
    Gebben, David J.
    Sutphin, Jessie
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    Schwedt, Todd J.
    Sapra, Sandhya
    Shah, Neel
    HEADACHE, 2019, 59 (05): : 715 - 726
  • [5] Patient and physician preferences for preventive migraine treatments in Japan: A discrete choice experiment
    Seo, J.
    Tervonen, T.
    Ueda, K.
    Zhang, D.
    Tockhorn-Heidenreich, A.
    HEADACHE, 2022, 62 : 74 - 75
  • [6] Patient preferences for preventive migraine treatments among Canadian adults: A discrete choice experiment
    Bougie, Joanna K.
    Krupsky, Kathryn
    Beusterien, Kathleen
    Ladouceur, Marie-Pier
    Mulvihill, Emily
    HEADACHE, 2025, 65 (01): : 113 - 123
  • [7] Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Patient Preferences for Self-Injectable Preventive Treatments for Migraine - A quantitative pilot
    Seo, Jaein
    Thomas, Caitlin
    Tervonen, Tommi
    Prawitz, Thibaud
    Ford, Janet
    Stauffer, Virginia
    Nicholson, Robert
    Duffy, Kevin
    Tockhorn-Heidenreich, Antje
    NEUROLOGY, 2021, 96 (15)
  • [8] Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Japanese Patients' and Physicians' Preferences for Preventive Treatments for Migraine
    Seo, Jaein
    Tervonen, Tommi
    Ueda, Kaname
    Zhang, Dian
    Danno, Daisuke
    Tockhorn-Heidenreich, Antje
    NEUROLOGY AND THERAPY, 2023, 12 (02) : 651 - 668
  • [9] Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Preventive Treatments for Migraine
    Jaein Seo
    Tommi Tervonen
    Kaname Ueda
    Dian Zhang
    Daisuke Danno
    Antje Tockhorn-Heidenreich
    Neurology and Therapy, 2023, 12 : 651 - 668
  • [10] Patient and Neurologist Preferences in the US for RRMS Treatments: Findings From a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Kumar, Jinender
    Will, Oliver
    Tencer, Tom
    Janelle Cambron-Mellott, M.
    Mackie, Demauri
    Beusterien, Kathleen
    NEUROLOGY, 2021, 96 (15)