Genomic prediction ability and genetic parameters for residual feed intake calculated using different approaches and their associations with growth, reproductive, and carcass traits in Nellore cattle

被引:0
|
作者
Brunes, Ludmilla Costa [1 ]
de Faria, Carina Ubirajara [2 ]
Magnabosco, Claudio Ulhoa [1 ]
Lobo, Raysildo Barbosa [3 ]
Peripolli, Elisa [4 ]
Aguilar, Ignacio [5 ]
Baldi, Fernando [4 ]
机构
[1] Embrapa Cerrados, Anim Performance Ctr, BR-73310970 Planaltina, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Coll Vet Med, BR-38410337 Uberlandia, MG, Brazil
[3] Natl Assoc Breeders & Researchers, BR-14020230 Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
[4] Sao Paulo State Univ, Coll Agr & Vet Sci, Dept Anim Sci, UNESP, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, Brazil
[5] Inst Nacl Invest Agr INIA, Montevideo 11500, Uruguay
关键词
Accuracy; Beef cattle; Bos taurus indicus; Feed efficiency; Genomic selection; Residual feed intake equation; DRY-MATTER INTAKE; EFFICIENCY TRAITS; WEIGHT-GAIN; PROGENY; DAIRY;
D O I
10.1007/s13353-022-00734-8
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This study aimed to estimate prediction ability and genetic parameters for residual feed intake (RFI) calculated using a regression equation for each test (RFItest) and for the whole population (RFIpop) in Nellore beef cattle. It also aimed to evaluate the correlations between RFIpop and RFItest with growth, reproductive, and carcass traits. Genotypic and phenotypic records from 8354 animals were used. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to verify the adequacy of the regression equations applied to estimate the RFItest and RFIpop. The (co)variance components were obtained using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction under single and two-trait animal model analyses. The genetic and phenotypic correlations between RFItest and RFIpop with dry matter intake, frame, growth, reproduction, and carcass-related traits were evaluated. The prediction ability and bias were estimated to compare the RFItest and RFIpop genomic breeding values (GEBV). The RFIpop ANOVA showed a higher significance level (p < 0.0001) than did the RFItest for the fixed effects. The RFIpop displayed higher additive genetic variance estimated than the RFItest, although the RFIpop and RFItest displayed similar heritabilities. Overall, the RFItest showed higher residual correlations with growth, reproductive, and carcass traits, while the RFIpop displayed higher genetic correlations with such traits. The GEBV for the RFItest was slightly biased than GEBV RFIpop. The approach to calculate the RFI influenced the decomposition and estimation of variance components and genomic prediction for RFI. The application of RFIpop would be more appropriate for genetic evaluation purpose to adjust or correct for non-genetic effects and to decrease the prediction bias for RFI.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:159 / 167
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle
    Bolormaa, S.
    Pryce, J. E.
    Kemper, K.
    Savin, K.
    Hayes, B. J.
    Barendse, W.
    Zhang, Y.
    Reich, C. M.
    Mason, B. A.
    Bunch, R. J.
    Harrison, B. E.
    Reverter, A.
    Herd, R. M.
    Tier, B.
    Graser, H. -U.
    Goddard, M. E.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (07) : 3088 - 3104
  • [32] Genomic dissection and prediction of feed intake and residual feed intake traits using a longitudinal model in F2 chickens
    Begli, H. Emamgholi
    Torshizi, R. Vaez
    Masoudi, A. A.
    Ehsani, A.
    Jensen, J.
    ANIMAL, 2018, 12 (09) : 1792 - 1798
  • [33] Prediction of Residual Feed Intake in Feedlot Steers Based on Phenotypic Associations with Feeding Behavior and Carcass Ultrasound Traits.
    Parsons, I. L.
    Johnson, J. R.
    Kayser, W. C.
    Miller, M. D.
    Carstens, G. E.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 : 13 - 14
  • [34] Effect of dietary protein content on performance, feed efficiency and carcass traits of feedlot Nellore and Angus x Nellore cross cattle at different growth stages
    Amaral, P. M.
    Mariz, L. D. S.
    Zanetti, D.
    Prados, L. F.
    Marcondes, M. I.
    Santos, S. A.
    Detmann, E.
    Faciola, A. P.
    Valadares Filho, S. C.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2018, 156 (01): : 110 - 117
  • [35] Genetic parameters for measures of residual feed intake and growth traits in seven generations of Duroc pigs
    Hoque, M. A.
    Kadowaki, H.
    Shibata, T.
    Oikawa, T.
    Suzuki, K.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2009, 121 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [36] Genetic parameters and relationships between growth traits and scrotal circumference measured at different ages in Nellore cattle
    Boligon, Arione Augusti
    Baldi, Fernando
    de Albuquerque, Lucia Galvao
    GENETICS AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (02) : 225 - 230
  • [37] Genomic prediction of carcass traits using different haplotype block partitioning methods in beef cattle
    Li, Hongwei
    Wang, Zezhao
    Xu, Lei
    Li, Qian
    Gao, Han
    Ma, Haoran
    Cai, Wentao
    Chen, Yan
    Gao, Xue
    Zhang, Lupei
    Gao, Huijiang
    Zhu, Bo
    Xu, Lingyang
    Li, Junya
    EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2022, 15 (12): : 2028 - 2042
  • [38] PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC-RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN RESIDUAL ENERGY-INTAKE AND GROWTH, FEED-INTAKE, AND CARCASS TRAITS OF YOUNG BULLS
    JENSEN, J
    MAO, IL
    ANDERSEN, BB
    MADSEN, P
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1992, 70 (02) : 386 - 395
  • [39] Genetic Analysis of Growth Traits in Polled Nellore Cattle Raised on Pasture in Tropical Region Using Bayesian Approaches
    Lopes, Fernando Brito
    Magnabosco, Claudio Ulhoa
    Paulini, Fernanda
    da Silva, Marcelo Correa
    Miyagi, Eliane Sayuri
    Lobo, Raysildo Barbosa
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09):
  • [40] Selection criteria for frame score and its association with growth-, reproductive-, feed efficiency- and carcass-related traits in Nellore cattle
    Negreiros, M. P.
    Peripolli, E.
    Espigolan, R.
    Londono-Gil, M.
    Rodriguez, J. D.
    Brunes, L.
    Magnabosco, C. U.
    Guimaraes, N. C.
    Sainz, R. D.
    Pereira, A. S. C.
    Lobo, R. B.
    Baldi, F.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2022, 62 (16) : 1551 - 1562