Ground Ambulance Billing And Prices Differ By Ownership Structure

被引:5
|
作者
Adler, Loren [1 ]
Ly, Bich [2 ]
Duffy, Erin [3 ]
Hannick, Kathleen [4 ]
Hall, Mark [4 ]
Trish, Erin [3 ]
机构
[1] Brookings Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Wake Forest Univ, Winston Salem, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00738
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The No Surprises Act prohibits most surprise billing but notably does not apply to ground ambulance services. In this study we created a novel data set that identifies the ownership structure of ground ambulance organizations to compare pricing and billing between private and public-sector ambulances, with a specific focus on organizations owned by private equity or publicly traded companies. Overall, we found that 28 percent of commercially insured emergency ground ambulance transports during the period 2014-17 resulted in a potential surprise bill. Our analysis illustrates that being transported by a private-sector ambulance in an emergency comes with substantially higher allowed amounts, patient cost sharing, and potential surprise bills compared with being transported by a public-sector ambulance. Further, allowed amounts and cost sharing tended to be higher for private equity- or publicly traded company-owned ambulances than other private-sector ambulances. These findings highlight substantial patient liability and important differences in pricing and billing patterns between public-and private-sector ground ambulance organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 236
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Epidemiological and Accounting Analysis of Ground Ambulance Whole Blood Transfusion
    Mapp, Julian G.
    Bank, Eric A.
    Osborn, Lesley A.
    Stringfellow, Michael L.
    Reininger, David W.
    Winckler, Christopher J.
    PREHOSPITAL AND DISASTER MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (01) : 98 - 103
  • [42] Effectiveness of helicopter versus ground ambulance services for interfacility transport
    Arfken, CL
    Shapiro, MJ
    Bessey, PQ
    Littenberg, B
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1998, 45 (04): : 785 - 790
  • [43] THE STRUCTURE OF OWNERSHIP AND PROSPERITY
    FOX, G
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIE RURALE, 1994, 42 (04): : 511 - 524
  • [44] Ownership Structure and Liquidity
    Isynuwardhana, Deannes
    Muslih, Muhamad
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2018, 24 (04) : 2665 - 2667
  • [45] The Geographic Distribution, Ownership, Prices, and Scope of Practice at Retail Clinics
    Rudavsky, Rena
    Pollack, Craig Evan
    Mehrotra, Ateev
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 151 (05) : 315 - U41
  • [46] A REVOLUTIONARY STRUCTURE FOR OWNERSHIP
    GALOWITZ, SW
    REAL ESTATE REVIEW, 1985, 15 (02): : 70 - 73
  • [47] THE CHOICE OF OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE
    MYGIND, N
    ECONOMIC AND INDUSTRIAL DEMOCRACY, 1992, 13 (03) : 359 - 399
  • [48] Adjustment of stock prices and volatility to changes in industrial timberland ownership
    Sun, Changyou
    Rahman, Mohammad M.
    Munn, Ian A.
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 26 : 91 - 101
  • [49] Globalization, ownership, and the effects of trade liberalization on Chinese import prices
    Choi, Bo-Young
    Swenson, Deborah L.
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2015, 22 (03) : 271 - 290
  • [50] On Control of the Ownership Structure
    Polterovich, V. M.
    ZHURNAL NOVAYA EKONOMICHESKAYA ASSOTSIATSIYA-JOURNAL OF THE NEW ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2013, (04): : 177 - 182