Approaches for coarsest granularity based near-optimal reduct computation

被引:2
|
作者
Bar, Abhimanyu [1 ]
Prasad, P. S. V. S. Sai [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hyderabad, Sch Comp & Informat Sci, Hyderabad 500046, Telengana, India
关键词
Feature selection; Near-optimal reduct; Sequential backward elimination method; A* search method; Rough set theory; Granular computing (GrC); FEATURE-SELECTION; ROUGH;
D O I
10.1007/s10489-022-03571-8
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Traditionally, the shortest length has been used as the optimality criterion in rough set based optimal / near-optimal reduct computation. A more generalizable alternative to the optimal reduct computation approach was recently introduced, with the coarsest granular space as the optimality criterion. However, owing to exponential time complexity, it is not scalable to even moderate-sized data sets. This article investigates to formulate two near-optimal reduct computation alternatives for scaling comparatively larger data sets. The first algorithm employs a controlled A* search based strategy to find a near-optimal reduct while reducing both space utilization and computational time. Whereas, the second algorithm employs a greedy sequential backward elimination (SBE) strategy on the higher granular space attribute ordering for achieving coarsest granular space based near-optimal reduct. The comparative experimental study is conducted among the proposed approaches with the coarsest granular space based optimal reduct algorithm A*RSOR and state-of-the-art shortest length based optimal and near-optimal reduct algorithms. The experimental study amply validates the relevance of the proposed approaches in obtaining near-optimal reduct with increased scalability and comparable or improved generalizable classification models induction.
引用
收藏
页码:4231 / 4256
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Image hiding based on near-optimal moire gratings
    Sakyte, Edita
    Palivonaite, Rita
    Aleksa, Algiment
    Ragulskis, Minvydas
    [J]. OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS, 2011, 284 (16-17) : 3954 - 3964
  • [22] Near-Optimal Column-Based Matrix Reconstruction
    Boutsidis, Christos
    Drineas, Petros
    Magdon-Ismail, Malik
    [J]. 2011 IEEE 52ND ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS 2011), 2011, : 305 - 314
  • [23] Universal Near-Optimal Feedbacks
    S. Nobakhtian
    R. J. Stern
    [J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2000, 107 : 89 - 122
  • [24] Barriers to Near-Optimal Equilibria
    Roughgarden, Tim
    [J]. 2014 55TH ANNUAL IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS 2014), 2014, : 71 - 80
  • [25] NEAR-OPTIMAL DECODING ALGORITHM
    KOROGODI.AM
    [J]. TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND RADIO ENGINEERING, 1972, 26 (09) : 130 - 132
  • [26] THE NEAR-OPTIMAL INSTRUCTION SET
    SMITH, T
    [J]. IEEE MICRO, 1982, 2 (03) : 5 - 6
  • [27] Universal near-optimal feedbacks
    Nobakhtian, S
    Stern, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2000, 107 (01) : 89 - 122
  • [28] Distributed near-optimal matching
    Deng, XT
    [J]. COMBINATORICA, 1996, 16 (04) : 453 - 464
  • [29] Near-Optimal Online Auctions
    Blum, Avrim
    Hartline, Jason D.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTEENTH ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, 2005, : 1156 - 1163
  • [30] Near-optimal terrain collision
    Malaek, S. M.
    Abbasi, A.
    [J]. 2006 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-9, 2006, : 2990 - +