Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Based Water Pipeline Leak Detection Using EDFL Sensor

被引:5
|
作者
Rajasekaran, Uma [1 ]
Kothandaraman, Mohanaprasad [1 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Inst Technol VIT Univ, Sch Elect Engn SENSE, Chennai 600127, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
One-dimensional convolutional neural network (1DCNN); Boosting algorithms; Decision tree (DT); Feature extraction; Clustering algorithms; Naive Bayes (NB); Support vector machines (SVM);
D O I
10.1061/JPSEA2.PSENG-1439
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A pipeline is the most efficient way to transport water from one place to another. Due to aging, corrosion, and external factors, the pipeline is prone to damage, which causes leaks. Many machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods are available to address this issue. This paper does an experimental study on available methods in ML and DL for leak detection for the collected data using an acousto-optic sensor. The experimental setup comprises of an acousto-optic sensor made of an erbium-doped fiber laser (EDFL), galvanized iron pipeline, a tank, a pump, and a data acquisition unit. The dimensions of the galvanized pipeline looped with the water tank are a length of 40 m, an inner diameter of 89 mm, and an outer diameter of 90 mm. The diameter of the simulated leak aperture is 5 mm. The methods analyzed in this study are k-means, k-medoids, Naive Bayes (NB), support vector machines (SVM), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), decision tree (DT), categorical boosting (CatBoost), random forest (RF), XGBoost, AdaBoost, and one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1DCNN). ML algorithms need a feature extraction technique because the data collected from the experiment is too large and contains redundant information. Feature extraction reduces the data size by extracting essential information. This paper extracts ten features from raw data. Among the ML algorithms, AdaBoost gives the highest prediction accuracy of 98.02%. This paper also implements eight models of 1DCNN, and Model 1 shows the best prediction accuracy of 98.16%, which is the highest compared with all the other classifiers in ML and DL for one-dimensional time series acousto-optic sensor data.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deep learning identifies leak in water pipeline system using transient frequency response
    Liao, Ziyuan
    Yan, Hexiang
    Tang, Zhenheng
    Chu, Xiaowen
    Tao, Tao
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2021, 155 (155) : 355 - 365
  • [22] Pipeline leak diagnosis based on leak-augmented scalograms and deep learning
    Siddique, Muhammad Farooq
    Ahmad, Zahoor
    Kim, Jong-Myon
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2023, 17 (01)
  • [23] IoT Security: A Comparative Analysis of Intrusion Detection Systems Based on Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Transfer Learning Techniques
    Mahjoubi, Hayat
    Aissaoui, Karima
    ADVANCES IN SMART MEDICAL, IOT & ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, VOL 2, ICSMAI 2024, 2024, 12 : 35 - 48
  • [24] A Comparative Review of Sentimental Analysis Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches
    Nagelli, Archana
    Saleena, B.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 22 (03)
  • [25] Smart Residential Water Leak and Overuse Detection System Using Machine Learning
    Ismail, Heba
    Elabyad, Rawan
    Dyab, Arwa
    2022 IEEE/ACS 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (AICCSA), 2022,
  • [26] Edge Computing Offloading Method Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning for Gas Pipeline Leak Detection
    Wei, Dong
    Wang, Renjun
    Xia, Changqing
    Xia, Tianhao
    Jin, Xi
    Xu, Chi
    MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (24)
  • [27] Cyberbullying Detection using Machine Learning and Deep Learning
    Alabdulwahab, Aljwharah
    Haq, Mohd Anul
    Alshehri, Mohammed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 14 (10) : 424 - 432
  • [28] Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning
    Gandhar A.
    Gupta K.
    Pandey A.K.
    Raj D.
    SN Computer Science, 5 (5)
  • [29] Fraud Detection using Machine Learning and Deep Learning
    Raghavan, Pradheepan
    El Gayar, Neamat
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY (ICCIKE' 2019), 2019, : 335 - 340
  • [30] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Ensemble Learning and Deep Learning Classifiers for Parkinson’s Disease Detection
    Goyal P.
    Rani R.
    SN Computer Science, 5 (1)