pH-Responsive Chitosan Sacrificial Layer for Simultaneous Enhancement of Ultrafiltration Performance and Sustainable Membrane Fouling Control

被引:2
|
作者
Zhou, Weiwei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Yunwei [2 ]
Zhao, Xiaojuan [2 ]
Wang, Jingwen [4 ]
Zhu, Xuewu [1 ]
Lai, Cunxian [1 ]
Wu, Daoji [1 ]
Cheng, Xiaoiang [1 ]
Xu, Jingtao [1 ]
Liang, Heng [5 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Jianzhu Univ, Sch Municipal & Environm Engn, Jinan 250101, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Shuifa Environm Technol Co Ltd, Jining 272352, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Urban Construction Vocat Coll, Jinan 250103, Peoples R China
[4] Ctr Ecol & Environm Protect Educ & Commun Shandong, Jinan 250013, Peoples R China
[5] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Environm, State Key Lab Urban Water Resource & Environm SKLU, Harbin 150090, Peoples R China
关键词
chitosan; ultrafiltrationmembranes; sustainableantifouling; sacrificial layer; regeneration; COMPOSITE NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; GRAPHENE OXIDE; CERAMIC ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER; FABRICATION; SEPARATION; OZONATION; OXIDATION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1021/acsapm.3c00920
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Membrane fouling is inevitable duringultrafiltrationof naturalsurface waters. High-performance ultrafiltration membranes with sustainableantifouling abilities and regenerable properties are of great importancefor water treatment. In this study, pH-responsive chitosan was usedas a sacrificial and protective layer to enhance the ultrafiltrationperformance with a coating-decoating-recoating strategy.The resultant membranes were systematically characterized to determinethe surface morphologies, separation, and antifouling capabilities.The results showed that the modified membranes exhibited enhancedhydrophilicity, reduced pore sizes, enhanced separation efficiencies,and improved antifouling behaviors at the expense of 3.4-18.8%reductions in the water fluxes. The atop chitosan layer served asthe sacrificial layer for foulant deposition and protected the underlyingsupport from fouling. Consequently, the fouled chitosan layer couldbe completely removed and regenerated by dissolution in an acid solutionand recoated at the same time. During ultrafiltration of natural surfacewater, the flux recovery rate of the optimized membrane reached 95%,which was much higher than that of the control membrane (60.3%). Themodified membranes exhibited excellent separation and antifoulingcapabilities in purifying real surface waters. Thus, the coating-decoating-recoatingstrategy is an economical and environmentally sound method for sustainablesurface modifications of ultrafiltration membranes used to producehigh-quality drinking water.
引用
收藏
页码:6875 / 6885
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] pH-responsive and fouling-release properties of PES ultrafiltration membranes modified by multi-functional block-like copolymers
    Zhao, Xueting
    Su, Yanlei
    Chen, Wenjuan
    Peng, Jinming
    Jiang, Zhongyi
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2011, 382 (1-2) : 222 - 230
  • [22] Use of preconditioning to control membrane fouling and enhance performance during ultrafiltration of plasmid DNA
    Li, Ying
    Borujeni, Ehsan Espah
    Zydney, Andrew L.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2015, 479 : 117 - 122
  • [23] Preparation of pH-responsive asymmetric polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes with enhanced anti-fouling properties and performance by incorporating poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) additive
    Xu, Ruizhang
    Wang, Jiantao
    Chen, DanDan
    Yang, Feng
    Kang, Jian
    Xiang, Ming
    Li, Lu
    Sheng, Xingyue
    RSC ADVANCES, 2018, 8 (72): : 41270 - 41279
  • [24] Effect of pH with different purified aluminum species on coagulation performance and membrane fouling in coagulation/ultrafiltration process
    Feng, Lijuan
    Zhao, Shuang
    Sun, Shenglei
    Wang, Wenyu
    Gao, Baoyu
    Yue, Qinyan
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2015, 300 : 67 - 74
  • [25] Ultrafiltration performance of spent brewer's yeast protein hydrolysate: Impact of pH and membrane material on fouling
    Marson, Gabriela Vollet
    Vitor Pereira, Debora Tamires
    da Costa Machado, Mariana Teixeira
    Di Luccio, Marco
    Martinez, Julian
    Belleville, Marie-Pierre
    Hubinger, Miriam Dupas
    JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2021, 302
  • [26] Modified chitosan-based, pH-responsive membrane for protein separation (vol 4, pg 53245, 2014)
    Chakrabarty, Tina
    Shahi, Vinod K.
    RSC ADVANCES, 2014, 4 (110): : 64731 - 64732
  • [27] pH-responsive P(AA-b-SBMA)-grafted magnetic GO high-performance ultrafiltration membrane with improved antifouling tendency and cleaning efficiency
    Hosseinzadeh, Alireza
    Ranjbar, Parviz Rashidi
    Bozorg, Ali
    DESALINATION, 2024, 574
  • [28] Lightweight pH-responsive chitosan hydrogel iron fertilizer: Efficient performance, controlled-release, and tomato application
    Liu, Haofu
    Huang, Zhiqing
    Shi, Yingyu
    Cai, Tingyao
    Miao, Qi
    Gao, Zideng
    Cui, Zhenling
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (05):
  • [29] pH-responsive chitosan-based flocculant for precise dye flocculation control and the recycling of textile dyeing effluents
    Wei, Tingting
    Wu, Liang
    Yu, Feng
    Lv, Yin
    Chen, Long
    Shi, Yulin
    Dai, Bin
    RSC ADVANCES, 2018, 8 (69): : 39334 - 39340
  • [30] PVDF blended PVDF-g-PMAA pH-responsive membrane: Effect of additives and solvents on membrane properties and performance
    Yang, Boxuan
    Yang, Xin
    Liu, Baicang
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    Chen, Chen
    Liang, Songmiao
    Chu, Liang-Yin
    Crittenden, John
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2017, 541 : 558 - 566