Weakly supervised deep learning for diagnosis of multiple vertebral compression fractures in CT

被引:4
|
作者
Choi, Euijoon [1 ]
Park, Doohyun [2 ]
Son, Geonhui [2 ]
Bak, Seongwon [3 ]
Eo, Taejoon [2 ]
Youn, Daemyung [4 ]
Hwang, Dosik [2 ,5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Dept Artificial Intelligence, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Vuno Inc, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Sch Management Technol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Korea Inst Sci & Technol, Ctr Healthcare Robot, 5,Hwarang Ro 14-Gil, Seoul 02792, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Yonsei Univ, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Yonsei Univ, CCIDS, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Deep learning; Classification; Fractures (Compression); Spine; MANAGEMENT; NETWORKS; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10394-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective This study aims to develop a weakly supervised deep learning (DL) model for vertebral-level vertebral compression fracture (VCF) classification using image-level labelled data.Methods The training set included 815 patients with normal (n = 507, 62%) or VCFs (n = 308, 38%). Our proposed model was trained on image-level labelled data for vertebral-level classification. Another supervised DL model was trained with vertebral-level labelled data to compare the performance of the proposed model.Results The test set included 227 patients with normal (n = 117, 52%) or VCFs (n = 110, 48%). For a fair comparison of the two models, we compared sensitivities with the same specificities of the proposed model and the vertebral-level supervised model. The specificity for overall L1-L5 performance was 0.981. The proposed model may outperform the vertebral-level supervised model with sensitivities of 0.770 vs 0.705 (p = 0.080), respectively. For vertebral-level analysis, the specificities for each L1-L5 were 0.974, 0.973, 0.970, 0.991, and 0.995, respectively. The proposed model yielded the same or better sensitivity than the vertebral-level supervised model in L1 (0.750 vs 0.694, p = 0.480), L3 (0.793 vs 0.586, p < 0.05), L4 (0.833 vs 0.667, p = 0.480), and L5 (0.600 vs 0.600, p = 1.000), respectively. The proposed model showed lower sensitivity than the vertebral-level supervised model for L2, but there was no significant difference (0.775 vs 0.825, p = 0.617).Conclusions The proposed model may have a comparable or better performance than the supervised model in vertebral-level VCF classification.
引用
收藏
页码:3750 / 3760
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnosis of Acute Versus Chronic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Compression Fractures Using CT Radiomics Based on Machine Learning: a Preliminary Study
    Zhuang, Xiangrong
    Wang, Jinan
    Kang, Jianghe
    Lin, Ziying
    JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [23] Automated Assessment of Vertebral Fractures from Chest CT Scans Using Deep Learning
    Nadeem, S.
    Comellas, A. P.
    Guha, I.
    Hoffman, E. A.
    Regan, E. A.
    Saha, P. K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 205
  • [24] Role of Transpedicular Percutaneous Vertebral Biopsy for Diagnosis of Pathology in Vertebral Compression Fractures
    Pagdal, Saurabh Shrinivas
    Nadkarni, Sunil
    Hardikar, Sharad Moreshwar
    Hardikar, Madan Sharad
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (05) : 925 - 929
  • [25] Prediction of subsequent osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture on CT radiography via deep learning
    Hu, Xiao
    Zhu, Yanjing
    Qian, Yadong
    Huang, Ruiqi
    Yin, Shuai
    Zeng, Zhili
    Xie, Ning
    Ma, Bin
    Yu, Yan
    Zhao, Qing
    Wu, Zhourui
    Wang, Jianjie
    Xu, Wei
    Ren, Yilong
    Li, Chen
    Zhu, Rongrong
    Cheng, Liming
    VIEW, 2022, 3 (06)
  • [26] Unreported Vertebral Body Compression Fractures at Abdominal Multidetector CT
    Carberry, George A.
    Pooler, B. Dustin
    Binkley, Neil
    Lauder, Travis B.
    Bruce, Richard J.
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (01) : 120 - 126
  • [27] A Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Semantic Segmentation Framework
    Zhang, Jizhi
    Zhang, Guoying
    Wang, Qiangyu
    Bai, Shuang
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART CLOUD (SMARTCLOUD), 2017, : 182 - 185
  • [28] Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation Based on Deep Learning
    Liang, Binxiu
    Liu, Yan
    He, Linxi
    Li, Jiangyun
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELLING, IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL (ICMIC2019), 2020, 582 : 455 - 464
  • [29] Weakly Supervised Instance Segmentation by Deep Community Learning
    Hwang, Jaedong
    Kim, Seohyun
    Son, Jeany
    Han, Bohyung
    2021 IEEE WINTER CONFERENCE ON APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTER VISION (WACV 2021), 2021, : 1019 - 1028
  • [30] Weakly Supervised Deep Learning Approach in Streaming Environments
    Pratama, Mahardhika
    Ashfahani, Andri
    Hady, Abdul
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2019, : 1195 - 1202