Imputation and missing indicators for handling missing data in the development and deployment of clinical prediction models: A simulation study

被引:12
|
作者
Sisk, Rose [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Sperrin, Matthew [1 ,3 ]
Peek, Niels [1 ,3 ,4 ]
van Smeden, Maarten [5 ]
Martin, Glen Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Manchester, England
[2] Gendius Ltd, Macclesfield, England
[3] Alan Turing Inst, London, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, NIHR Manchester Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, England
[5] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht Univ, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Vaughan House,Portsmouth St, Manchester, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Clinical prediction model; missing data; imputation; electronic health record; simulation; prediction; VALUES; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1177/09622802231165001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In clinical prediction modelling, missing data can occur at any stage of the model pipeline; development, validation or deployment. Multiple imputation is often recommended yet challenging to apply at deployment; for example, the outcome cannot be in the imputation model, as recommended under multiple imputation. Regression imputation uses a fitted model to impute the predicted value of missing predictors from observed data, and could offer a pragmatic alternative at deployment. Moreover, the use of missing indicators has been proposed to handle informative missingness, but it is currently unknown how well this method performs in the context of clinical prediction models.Methods: We simulated data under various missing data mechanisms to compare the predictive performance of clinical prediction models developed using both imputation methods. We consider deployment scenarios where missing data is permitted or prohibited, imputation models that use or omit the outcome, and clinical prediction models that include or omit missing indicators. We assume that the missingness mechanism remains constant across the model pipeline. We also apply the proposed strategies to critical care data. Results: With complete data available at deployment, our findings were in line with existing recommendations; that the outcome should be used to impute development data when using multiple imputation and omitted under regression imputation. When missingness is allowed at deployment, omitting the outcome from the imputation model at the development was preferred. Missing indicators improved model performance in many cases but can be harmful under outcome-dependent missingness.Conclusion: We provide evidence that commonly taught principles of handling missing data via multiple imputation may not apply to clinical prediction models, particularly when data can be missing at deployment. We observed comparable predictive performance under multiple imputation and regression imputation. The performance of the missing data handling method must be evaluated on a study-by-study basis, and the most appropriate strategy for handling missing data at development should consider whether missing data are allowed at deployment. Some guidance is provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1461 / 1477
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials: An Overview
    William R. Myers
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2000, 34 (2): : 525 - 533
  • [42] Methods for Handling Missing Variables in Risk Prediction Models
    Held, Ulrike
    Kessels, Alfons
    Aymerich, Judith Garcia
    Basagana, Xavier
    ter Riet, Gerben
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    Puhan, Milo A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 184 (07) : 545 - 551
  • [43] Hybrid prediction model with missing value imputation for medical data
    Purwar, Archana
    Singh, Sandeep Kumar
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (13) : 5621 - 5631
  • [44] Toward the Imputation and Prediction of Condition Monitoring Data with Missing Values
    Zhang, Di
    Li, Canbing
    Zhu, Jizhong
    2023 IEEE/IAS INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEM ASIA, I&CPS ASIA, 2023, : 996 - 1002
  • [45] Consequences of handling missing data for treatment response in osteoarthritis: a simulation study
    Olsen, I. C.
    Kvien, T. K.
    Uhlig, T.
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2012, 20 (08) : 822 - 828
  • [46] Performance Evaluation of Predictive Models for Missing Data Imputation in Weather Data
    Doreswamy
    Gad, Ibrahim
    Manjunatha, B. R.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS (ICACCI), 2017, : 1327 - 1334
  • [47] EVALUATION OF MISSING DATA IMPUTATION STRATEGIES IN CLINICAL TRIAL AND EMR DATA USING STANDARDIZED DATA MODELS
    McLean, C.
    Ransom, J.
    Galaznik, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S520 - S520
  • [48] Multiple imputation for missing data in a longitudinal cohort study: a tutorial based on a detailed case study involving imputation of missing outcome data
    Lee, Katherine J.
    Roberts, Gehan
    Doyle, Lex W.
    Anderson, Peter J.
    Carlin, John B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2016, 19 (05) : 575 - 591
  • [49] TRANSPOSABLE REGULARIZED COVARIANCE MODELS WITH AN APPLICATION TO MISSING DATA IMPUTATION
    Allen, Genevera I.
    Tibshirani, Robert
    ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2010, 4 (02): : 764 - 790
  • [50] Parametric fractional imputation for mixed models with nonignorable missing data
    Yang, Shu
    Kim, Jae-Kwang
    Zhu, Zhengyuan
    STATISTICS AND ITS INTERFACE, 2013, 6 (03) : 339 - 347