Imputation and missing indicators for handling missing data in the development and deployment of clinical prediction models: A simulation study

被引:12
|
作者
Sisk, Rose [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Sperrin, Matthew [1 ,3 ]
Peek, Niels [1 ,3 ,4 ]
van Smeden, Maarten [5 ]
Martin, Glen Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Manchester, England
[2] Gendius Ltd, Macclesfield, England
[3] Alan Turing Inst, London, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, NIHR Manchester Biomed Res Ctr, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, England
[5] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Utrecht Univ, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ Manchester, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Vaughan House,Portsmouth St, Manchester, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Clinical prediction model; missing data; imputation; electronic health record; simulation; prediction; VALUES; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1177/09622802231165001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In clinical prediction modelling, missing data can occur at any stage of the model pipeline; development, validation or deployment. Multiple imputation is often recommended yet challenging to apply at deployment; for example, the outcome cannot be in the imputation model, as recommended under multiple imputation. Regression imputation uses a fitted model to impute the predicted value of missing predictors from observed data, and could offer a pragmatic alternative at deployment. Moreover, the use of missing indicators has been proposed to handle informative missingness, but it is currently unknown how well this method performs in the context of clinical prediction models.Methods: We simulated data under various missing data mechanisms to compare the predictive performance of clinical prediction models developed using both imputation methods. We consider deployment scenarios where missing data is permitted or prohibited, imputation models that use or omit the outcome, and clinical prediction models that include or omit missing indicators. We assume that the missingness mechanism remains constant across the model pipeline. We also apply the proposed strategies to critical care data. Results: With complete data available at deployment, our findings were in line with existing recommendations; that the outcome should be used to impute development data when using multiple imputation and omitted under regression imputation. When missingness is allowed at deployment, omitting the outcome from the imputation model at the development was preferred. Missing indicators improved model performance in many cases but can be harmful under outcome-dependent missingness.Conclusion: We provide evidence that commonly taught principles of handling missing data via multiple imputation may not apply to clinical prediction models, particularly when data can be missing at deployment. We observed comparable predictive performance under multiple imputation and regression imputation. The performance of the missing data handling method must be evaluated on a study-by-study basis, and the most appropriate strategy for handling missing data at development should consider whether missing data are allowed at deployment. Some guidance is provided.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1461 / 1477
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Imputation is beneficial for handling missing data in predictive models
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    van Veen, Mirjam
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (09) : 979 - 979
  • [2] Multiple imputation with missing data indicators
    Beesley, Lauren J.
    Bondarenko, Irina
    Elliot, Michael R.
    Kurian, Allison W.
    Katz, Steven J.
    Taylor, Jeremy M. G.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (12) : 2685 - 2700
  • [3] A comparison of imputation techniques for handling missing data
    Musil, CM
    Warner, CB
    Yobas, PK
    Jones, SL
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2002, 24 (07) : 815 - 829
  • [4] Randomization tests in clinical trials with multiple imputation for handling missing data
    Ivanova, Anastasia
    Lederman, Seth
    Stark, Philip B.
    Sullivan, Gregory
    Vaughn, Ben
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2022, 32 (03) : 441 - 449
  • [5] Multiple imputation as a flexible tool for missing data handling in clinical research
    Enders, Craig K.
    BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2017, 98 : 4 - 18
  • [6] Considerations of multiple imputation approaches for handling missing data in clinical trials
    Quan, Hui
    Qi, Li
    Luo, Xiaodong
    Darchy, Loic
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2018, 70 : 62 - 71
  • [7] Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study
    Matthew Sperrin
    Glen P. Martin
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20
  • [8] Multiple imputation with missing indicators as proxies for unmeasured variables: simulation study
    Sperrin, Matthew
    Martin, Glen P.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [9] Multiple Imputation A Flexible Tool for Handling Missing Data
    Li, Peng
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    Allison, David B.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (18): : 1966 - 1967
  • [10] Handling missing data in nursing research with multiple imputation
    Kneipp, SM
    McIntosh, M
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2001, 50 (06) : 384 - 389