Improving Risk Stratification for Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction

被引:9
|
作者
Taggart, Caelan [1 ]
Monterrubio-Gomez, Karla [2 ]
Roos, Andreas [3 ,4 ]
Boeddinghaus, Jasper [1 ]
Kimenai, Dorien M. [1 ]
Kadesjo, Erik [3 ,5 ]
Bularga, Anda [1 ]
Wereski, Ryan [1 ]
Ferry, Amy [1 ]
Lowry, Matthew [1 ]
Anand, Atul [1 ]
Lee, Kuan Ken [1 ]
Doudesis, Dimitrios [1 ,5 ]
Manolopoulou, Ioanna [7 ]
Nestelberger, Thomas [8 ]
Koechlin, Luca [8 ]
Lopez-Ayala, Pedro [8 ]
Mueller, Christian [8 ]
Mills, Nicholas L. [1 ,6 ]
Vallejos, Catalina A. [2 ,9 ]
Chapman, Andrew R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, BHF Ctr Cardiovasc Sci, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Genet & Canc, MRC Human Genet Unit, Edinburgh, Scotland
[3] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med, Clin Epidemiol Div, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency & Reparat Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Univ Edinburgh, Usher Inst, Edinburgh, Scotland
[7] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London, England
[8] Univ Hosp Basel, Cardiovasc Res Inst Basel CRIB, Basel, Switzerland
[9] Alan Turing Inst, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
risk prediction; type 2 myocardial infarction; SENSITIVITY CARDIAC TROPONIN; DIAGNOSIS; SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.025
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Despite poor cardiovascular outcomes, there are no dedicated, validated risk stratification tools to guide investigation or treatment in type 2 myocardial infarction. OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to derive and validate a risk stratification tool for the prediction of death or future myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. METHODS The T2-risk score was developed in a prospective multicenter cohort of consecutive patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for the primary outcome of myocardial infarction or death at 1 year using variables selected a priori based on clinical importance. Discrimination was assessed by area under the receiving-operating characteristic curve (AUC). Calibration was investigated graphically. The tool was validated in a single-center cohort of consecutive patients and in a multicenter cohort study from sites across Europe. RESULTS There were 1,121, 250, and 253 patients in the derivation, single-center, and multicenter validation cohorts, with the primary outcome occurring in 27% (297 of 1,121), 26% (66 of 250), and 14% (35 of 253) of patients, respec-tively. The T2-risk score incorporating age, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, myocardial ischemia on electrocardiogram, heart rate, anemia, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and maximal cardiac troponin concentration had good discrimination (AUC: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.73-0.79) for the primary outcome and was well calibrated. Discrimination was similar in the consecutive patient (AUC: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.77-0.88) and multicenter (AUC: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.64-0.83) cohorts. T2-risk provided improved discrimination over the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events 2.0 risk score in all cohorts. CONCLUSIONS The T2-risk score performed well in different health care settings and could help clinicians to prog-nosticate, as well as target investigation and preventative therapies more effectively. (High-Sensitivity Troponin in the Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome [High-STEACS]; NCT01852123) (J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;81:156-168) (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foun-dation. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 168
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] New biomarkers in the risk stratification of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction
    Rogers B.A.
    Newby L.K.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2002, 4 (4) : 341 - 347
  • [22] Risk stratification in patients with acute myocardial infarction using several scores
    Santos Medina, Maikel
    Gutierrez Martinez, Angel A.
    Obregon Santos, C. Angel G.
    Rodriguez Ramos, Miguel
    Piriz Assa, C. Alberto R.
    Toledo Perez, Lester
    CORSALUD, 2021, 13 (03): : 271 - 281
  • [23] Potential role of positive psychology on risk stratification in patients with myocardial infarction
    Magan, Ines
    Moreno, Guillermo
    Jurado-Barba, Rosa
    Corral, Monica
    Bueno, Hector
    REVISTA DE LA FEDERACION ARGENTINA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2023, 52 (01): : 36 - 44
  • [24] Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Poess, Janine
    Koester, Jelena
    Fuernau, Georg
    Eitel, Ingo
    de Waha, Suzanne
    Ouarrak, Taoufik
    Lassus, Johan
    Harjola, Veli-Pekka
    Zeymer, Uwe
    Thiele, Holger
    Desch, Steffen
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (15) : 1913 - 1920
  • [25] Risk stratification of patients after myocardial infarction by the fuzzy and weighted methods
    Honzik, P
    Hrabec, J
    Lábrová, R
    Semrád, B
    Honziková, N
    ANALYSIS OF BIOMEDICAL SIGNALS AND IMAGES, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 463 - 465
  • [26] Increased Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Depressed Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
    Scherrer, Jeffrey F.
    Garfield, Lauren D.
    Chrusciel, Timothy
    Hauptman, Paul J.
    Carney, Robert M.
    Freedland, Kenneth E.
    Owen, Richard
    True, William R.
    Lustman, Patrick J.
    DIABETES CARE, 2011, 34 (08) : 1729 - 1734
  • [27] The role of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in the risk stratification of patients with remote myocardial infarction
    Travin, MI
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (06) : 656 - 659
  • [28] The role of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in the risk stratification of patients with remote myocardial infarction
    Mark I. Travin
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2004, 11 : 656 - 659
  • [29] Role of risk stratification after myocardial infarction
    Kuriachan V.
    Exner D.V.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2009, 11 (1) : 10 - 21
  • [30] RISK STRATIFICATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
    CAMM, AJ
    FEI, L
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 17 (03): : 401 - 416