Validation of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire scale in medical students and doctors in Chile

被引:0
|
作者
Lopez, Francisco J. Villalon [1 ,3 ]
Escaffi-Schwarz, Maximiliano [2 ]
Mundt, Adrian [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Diego Portales, Centro Educac Med & Simulac Clin CEMSIC, Fac Med, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Diego Portales, Fac Adm & Econ, Santiago, Chile
[3] Univ Diego Portales, Fac Med, Programa Postgrado Psiquiat & Salud Mental, Complejo Asistencial Sotero Rio, Santiago, Chile
[4] Univ Chile, Fac Med, Dept Psiquiatria & Salud Mental, Santiago, Chile
[5] Univ Diego Portales, Fac Medi, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Mindfulness; Physicians; Students; Surveys and Questionnaires; Validation Study; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; COGNITIVE THERAPY; SELF-REPORT; DEPRESSION; VALIDITY; FATIGUE; STRESS; PEOPLE; FFMQ;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The increasing use of Mindfulness-based interventions requires standardized construct-based measurement instruments for clinical and research purposes. The Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire scale with five factors was developed in the United States and validated in Spain. There are versions of 39, 24 and 15 items (FFMQ-39, FFMQ-24 and FFMQ-15). Objective: To validate the FFMQ-24 and FFMQ-15 scale in Chile. Methodology: Six experts performed a linguistic adaptation of the Spanish version of the FFMQ-24. The adapted instrument was applied to a sample of 795 physicians. Internal validity was analyzed by calculating Cronbach's alpha (a) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Finally, 15 items were retained, and the 5-factor solution was maintained. The FFMQ-15 scale was applied to a sample of 365 medical students and analyzed by calculating (a) and CFA. The external validity of FFMQ-15 was evaluated with the Mental Health Continiuum-14 (MHC-14) scale. Results: Linguistic changes were made. The CFA of FFMQ-24 obtained a lower-than-expected fit for a 5-factor solution. The (a) value varied between.68 and.86 in all dimensions. The FFMQ-15 had an adequate fit for five factors for physicians (c2 = 216.17, df = 80, p <.01; CFI =.96; TLI =.94; RMSEA =.05 [.04,.06]; SRMR =.04) and students (c2 = 163.61, df = 80, p <.01; CF =.96; TLI =.94; RMSEA =.05 [.04,.07]; SRMR =.05). External validity with MHC-14 was adequate. Conclusion: The FFMQ-15 scale has acceptable internal consistency and adequate internal and external validity in Chile.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:435 / 445
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity evidence of the portuguese version of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire
    Ramos, Alexandre
    Rosado, Antonio
    Serpa, Sidonio
    Cangas, Adolfo
    Gallego, Jose
    Ramos, Luis
    REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA DEL DEPORTE, 2018, 27 (02): : 87 - 97
  • [32] DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MINDFULNESS MEDITATION AND MINDFUL YOGA AS MEASURED BY THE FIVE FACET MINDFULNESS QUESTIONNAIRE
    Jones, Shaun M.
    Kazanis, William
    Rosen, Kristen
    Curtis, Megan
    Potter, Jennifer Sharpe
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2018, 52 : S525 - S525
  • [33] Factor Structure and External Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Pregnancy
    Kantrowitz-Gordon, Ira
    MINDFULNESS, 2018, 9 (01) : 243 - 257
  • [34] Factor Analysis of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in a Heterogeneous Clinical Sample
    Curtiss, Joshua
    Klemanski, David H.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2014, 36 (04) : 683 - 694
  • [35] Improving the Precision of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Using a Rasch Approach
    Oleg N. Medvedev
    Richard J. Siegert
    Paula Kersten
    Christian U. Krägeloh
    Mindfulness, 2017, 8 : 995 - 1008
  • [36] The Italian Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: A Contribution to its Validity and Reliability
    Caterina Giovannini
    Luciano Giromini
    Laura Bonalume
    Angela Tagini
    Margherita Lang
    Gherardo Amadei
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2014, 36 : 415 - 423
  • [37] Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples
    Baer, Ruth A.
    Smith, Gregory T.
    Lykins, Emily
    Button, Daniel
    Krietemeyer, Jennifer
    Sauer, Shannon
    Walsh, Erin
    Duggan, Danielle
    Williams, J. Mark G.
    ASSESSMENT, 2008, 15 (03) : 329 - 342
  • [38] Factor Analysis of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in a Heterogeneous Clinical Sample
    Joshua Curtiss
    David H. Klemanski
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2014, 36 : 683 - 694
  • [39] Social Anxiety and Misinterpretation of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Describe Subscale
    Jensen, Dane
    Bruce, Laura C.
    Heimberg, Richard G.
    Matt, Lindsey M.
    Morrison, Amanda S.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2016, 30 (03) : 168 - 176
  • [40] Improving the Precision of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Using a Rasch Approach
    Medvedev, Oleg N.
    Siegert, Richard J.
    Kersten, Paula
    Krageloh, Christian U.
    MINDFULNESS, 2017, 8 (04) : 995 - 1008