Standardized PSMA-PET Imaging of Advanced Prostate Cancer

被引:2
|
作者
Seifert, R. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Gafita, A. [3 ]
Telli, T. [1 ,2 ]
Voter, Andrew [3 ]
Herrmann, K. [1 ,2 ]
Pomper, Martin [3 ]
Hadaschik, B. [2 ,4 ]
Rowe, Steven P. [3 ]
Fendler, W. P. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Nucl Med, Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Essen, German Canc Consortium DKTK, Essen, Germany
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Urol, Essen, Germany
[5] PET Comm German Soc Nucl Med, Gottingen, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp Essen, Dept Nucl Med, Hufelandstr 55, D-45147 Essen, Germany
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; RESPONSE EVALUATION; GA-68-PSMA-11; PET; TUMOR VOLUME; EXPRESSION; CRITERIA; VERSION; RECIST; MULTICENTER; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Imaging of advanced prostate cancer is a challenging task, as it requires longitudinal characterization of disease extent in a standardized way to enable appropriate treatment selection and evaluation of treatment efficacy. In the last years, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT has become the reference standard examination for patients with advanced prostate cancer. Together with the rise of PSMA-PET, standardized frameworks for the reporting of image findings have been proposed, eg, the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE) and the structured reporting system for PSMA targeted PET imaging (PSMA-RADS) framework. Therefore, recent evidence on PSMA-PET derived tumor volume as useful a biomarker for outcome prognostication and related frameworks will be discussed in the article. The PROMISE framework recommends quantifying the tumor volume per-organ system, which accounts for the fact that the location of the metastases greatly influence its biological aggressiveness. In addition, changes in PSMAPET derived tumor volume have been shown to be promising biomarkers for response assessment. Limitations of PSMA-PET will also be discussed because the tumor volume might not always be suited for response assessment. As a pitfall of PSMA-based systems, decreasing PSMA-expression might erroneously be interpreted as response to therapy. Also, especially for patients with limited disease, the tumor volume might not be ideal for response assessment. Therefore, various frameworks have been introduced to objectively measure response to therapy with PSMA-PET. Amongst these, the PSMA-PET progression (PPP) criteria and the response evaluation criteria in PSMA (RECIP) are optimized for earlier and later phenotypes of advanced prostate cancer, respectively. Variables needed to determine PPP or RECIP outcome on PSMA-PET are recorded under the umbrella of PROMISE recommendations. In this article, various reporting and response assessment frameworks are explained and discussed. Also, recent evidence for the relevance of PSMAPET biomarkers for clinical management and outcome prognostication are shown. Semin Nucl Med 54:60-68 (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 68
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Utility of PSMA-PET imaging
    Ahmadzadehfar, Hojjat
    Biersack, Hans Jurgen
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 118 (35-36): : 603 - 603
  • [12] Prospective evaluation of PSMA-PET imaging for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer
    Eiber, Matthias
    Maurer, Tobias
    Beer, Ambros
    Souvatzoglou, Michael
    Weirich, Gregor
    Kuebler, Hubert
    Gschwend, Juergen
    Wester, Hans
    Schwaiger, Markus
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55
  • [13] The Use of FDG-PET in conjunction with PSMA-PET in Prostate Cancer
    Gokhale, Saket
    Kuang, Angie
    Teichner, Eric
    Subtirelu, Robert
    Werner, Thomas
    Hoilund-Carlsen, Poul Flemming
    Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth
    Alavi, Abass
    Raynor, William
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 64
  • [14] FDG-PET Versus PSMA-PET: A Patient With Prostate Cancer
    Kichloo, Asim
    Amir, Rawan
    Aljadah, Michael
    Wani, Farah
    Solanki, Shantanu
    Singh, Jagmeet
    Chugh, Savneek Singh
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE HIGH IMPACT CASE REPORTS, 2020, 8
  • [15] Patterns of failure in a primary staging setting for prostate cancer evaluated with PSMA-PET imaging
    Schiller, K.
    Devecka, M.
    Maurer, T.
    Eiber, M.
    Combs, S. E.
    Habl, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S433 - S434
  • [16] Prognostic PSMA-PET PROMISE nomograms for patients with prostate cancer
    Fendler, Wolfgang Peter
    Karpinski, Madeleine J.
    Huesing, Johannes
    Claassen, Kevin
    Moeller, Lennart
    Kajueter, Hiltraud
    Oesterling, Florian
    Gruenwald, Viktor
    Umutlu, Lale
    Lanzafame, Helena
    Telli, Tugce
    Merkel-Jens, Anja
    Huesing, Anika
    Kesch, Claudia
    Herrmann, Ken
    Stang, Andreas
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [17] PSMA-PET to detect prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy
    Omar Alghazo
    Michael O’Callaghan
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2023, 20 : 5 - 6
  • [18] Prostate cancer: PSMA-PET better than conventional staging
    不详
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2024, 55 (01) : 10 - 10
  • [19] Future treatment strategies for prostate cancer guided by PSMA-PET
    Watabe, Tadashi
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S453 - S453
  • [20] PSMA-PET to detect prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy
    Alghazo, Omar
    O'Callaghan, Michael
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2023, 20 (01) : 5 - 6