Evaluation of green spaces suitability analysis with GIS-based AHP and TOPSIS methods

被引:0
|
作者
Topcu, Gamze Zeynep [1 ]
Bayir, Kader [1 ]
Cavildak, Zeynep Ebrar [1 ]
Basegmez, Murat [2 ]
Aydin, Cevdet Coskun [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Mahendisl Fak, Geomat Mahendisligi Bolumu, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Milli Egitim Bakanligi, CBS & Emlak Daire Baskanligi, Ankara, Turkiye
来源
GEOMATIK | 2023年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
Green Spaces; AHP; TOPSIS; GIS; WEIGHTED LINEAR COMBINATION; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; MAKING MCDM METHODS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; URBAN; ACCESSIBILITY; BENEFITS; SYSTEMS; BIODIVERSITY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.29128/geomatik.1171069
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Cities are in constant development with increasing population densities. This situation creates various problems for planners to ensure the planning and sustainability of cities. The areas where today's people feel the most lack in cities are green. It is essential to plan green spaces, which is one of the most critical factors in increasing the quality of life of people and eliminating the problems that arise. In this study, Emek, Bahcelievler, and Yukari Bahcelievler neighbourhoods of Ankara province cankaya district were selected as the study area, and twelve criteria were determined for the green spaces analysis. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method was used to determine the weights of these criteria relative to each other. Geographical information systems (GIS) were used for the location analysis of the criteria. The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method was used to determine the order of importance of the most suitable green spaces. In the TOPSIS method, both equally weighted and AHP weighted calculations were made. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the ranking of 44.4% of the nine regions was similar. As a result of the study, it was determined that the area was insufficient in terms of green spaces, and the use of the applied method for sustainable urban models was evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 249
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS for earthquake hazard analysis
    Penjani Hopkins Nyimbili
    Turan Erden
    Himmet Karaman
    Natural Hazards, 2018, 92 : 1523 - 1546
  • [32] Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS for earthquake hazard analysis
    Nyimbili, Penjani Hopkins
    Erden, Turan
    Karaman, Himmet
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2018, 92 (03) : 1523 - 1546
  • [34] Land suitability analysis for paddy crop using GIS-based Fuzzy-AHP (F-AHP) method in Koch Bihar district, West Bengal
    Sarkar, Bappa
    Das, Prasanta
    Islam, Nazrul
    Basak, Amiya
    Debnath, Manoj
    Roy, Ranjan
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (25) : 8952 - 8978
  • [35] Settlement suitability analysis of a riverine floodplain in the perspective of GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis
    Alam, Nasibul
    Saha, Swati
    Gupta, Srimanta
    Chatterjee, Anubhav
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (24) : 66002 - 66020
  • [36] Settlement suitability analysis of a riverine floodplain in the perspective of GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis
    Nasibul Alam
    Swati Saha
    Srimanta Gupta
    Anubhav Chatterjee
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 66002 - 66020
  • [37] GIS-based analysis of rock salt deposits' suitability for underground hydrogen storage
    Lankof, Leszek
    Tarkowski, Radoslaw
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (71) : 27748 - 27765
  • [38] GIS-based site suitability analysis for wind farm development in Saudi Arabia
    Baseer, M. A.
    Rehman, S.
    Meyer, J. P.
    Alam, Md. Mahbub
    ENERGY, 2017, 141 : 1166 - 1176
  • [39] GIS-based Logic Scoring of Preference method for urban densification suitability analysis
    Shen, Shuoge
    Dragicevic, Suzana
    Dujmovic, Jozo
    COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2021, 89
  • [40] Ecological suitability evaluation for torreya Crop in Hangzhou city based on a GIS-based fuzzy model
    Huang, Weijiao
    Huang, Jingfeng
    THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS (AGRO-GEOINFORMATICS 2014), 2014, : 103 - 108