Addition of gentamicin for antibiotic prophylaxis in hip hemiarthroplasty does not decrease the rate of surgical site infection

被引:1
|
作者
Amzallag, Nissan [1 ]
Ashkenazi, Itay [1 ]
Factor, Shai [1 ]
Abadi, Mohamed [1 ]
Morgan, Samuel [2 ]
Graif, Nadav [1 ]
Snir, Nimrod [1 ]
Gold, Aviram [1 ]
Warschawski, Yaniv [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Div Orthoped, 6 Weizman St, IL-6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Hip hemiarthroplasty; Periprosthetic joint infection; Gentamicin; Surgical site infection; PROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTIONS; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY; RISK-FACTORS; ARTHROPLASTY; GUIDELINES; ETIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-023-02406-6
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe addition of Gram-negative coverage to antibiotic prophylaxis protocols prior to elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to reduce periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, it is unknown whether adding a Gram-negative-targeted antibiotic agent improves outcomes in the trauma population. This study aimed to investigate whether the addition of a single, pre-operative dose of Gentamicin is associated with lower rates of PJI in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty (HA) as treatment for a hip fracture.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed cases of patients who underwent HA as treatment for a hip fracture from January 2011 to January 2022, and had a minimum 1-year of follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on the antibiotic prophylaxis they received during surgery: cefazolin (control group) or cefazolin with addition of Gentamicin (case group). The primary outcome was the rate of surgical site infections (SSI), and secondary outcomes included rates of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and superficial SSIs.ResultsThe final study population consisted of 1521 patients. 336 patients (22.1%) were in the case group and 1185 (77.9%) patients were in the control group. Rates of SSI were comparable between the groups (3.8% for the case group vs. 2.8% in the control group, p = 0.34). This held true for both PJIs (3.5 vs. 2.5%, p = 0.3) and superficial SSIs (0.29 vs. 0.33%, p = 0.91). The distribution of the causing pathogen was similar between the groups (p = 0.84). Gentamicin susceptibility rates of the Gram-negative bacteria associated with PJI were similar between the cohorts (p = 0.51).ConclusionsThe addition of a single, pre-operative dose of Gentamicin to the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol of patients undergoing HA as treatment for a hip fracture was not associated with lower rates of SSI, PJI or superficial SSI. The findings of this study indicate that the prophylactic benefits of Gentamicin may not apply to HA as they do to THA.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 873
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does addition of gentamicin for antibiotic prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty reduce the rate of periprosthetic joint infection?
    Itay Ashkenazi
    Nisan Amzallag
    Nimrod Snir
    Samuel Morgan
    Simon Garceau
    Liri Kotz
    Aviram Gold
    Yaniv Warschawski
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2023, 143 : 5255 - 5260
  • [2] Does addition of gentamicin for antibiotic prophylaxis in total knee arthroplasty reduce the rate of periprosthetic joint infection?
    Ashkenazi, Itay
    Amzallag, Nisan
    Snir, Nimrod
    Morgan, Samuel
    Garceau, Simon
    Kotz, Liri
    Gold, Aviram
    Warschawski, Yaniv
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2023, 143 (08) : 5255 - 5260
  • [3] Antibiotic prophylaxis and the prevention of surgical site infection
    Bucher, Brian T.
    Warner, Brad W.
    Dillon, Patrick A.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2011, 23 (03) : 334 - 338
  • [4] ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS AND NEONATAL SURGICAL SITE INFECTION
    Battin, Malcolm
    Jamalpuri, Vijayanand
    Bough, Georgina
    Voss, Lesley
    JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2016, 52 (09) : 913 - 914
  • [5] Audit on antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infection
    Sathiapillai, A. Arockiasamy
    Srinath, C.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 72 : 72 - 72
  • [6] Reduction in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis expenditure and the rate of surgical site infection by means of a protocol that controls the use of prophylaxis
    Gomez, Marisa I.
    Acosta-Gnass, Silvia I.
    Mosqueda-Barboza, Luisa
    Basualdo, Juan A.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 27 (12): : 1358 - 1365
  • [7] Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis: Incidence and Risk of Surgical Site Infection
    Fadzwani, B.
    Raha, A. R.
    Nadia, M. N.
    Rahiza, Wan W. M.
    Razman, J.
    Nordiah, A. J.
    IIUM MEDICAL JOURNAL MALAYSIA, 2020, 19 (01): : 45 - 53
  • [8] Timing of Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis and the Risk of Surgical Site Infection
    Hawn, Mary T.
    Richman, Joshua S.
    Vick, Catherine C.
    Deierhoi, Rhiannon J.
    Graham, Laura A.
    Henderson, William G.
    Itani, Kamal M. F.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2013, 148 (07) : 649 - 657
  • [9] DOES THE ADDITION OF TOPICAL VANCOMYCIN DECREASE THE INCIDENCE OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION IN BONE TUMORS?
    Puri, A.
    Gulia, A.
    Suman, M. B.
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2014, 61 : S248 - S249
  • [10] Surgical site infection prevention by antibiotic prophylaxis audit
    Kapur, S.
    Srinath, C.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 : 15 - 15