共 50 条
Identifying the barriers faced by obstetricians and registrars in screening or enquiry of intimate partner violence in pregnancy: A systematic review of the primary evidence
被引:0
|作者:
Lu, Corrine
[1
,5
]
Georgousopoulou, Ekavi
[2
]
Baloch, Surriya
[3
]
Walton-Sonda, Dianne
[1
]
Hegarty, Kelsey
[4
]
Sethna, Farah
[1
]
Brown, Nick A. T.
[1
,4
]
机构:
[1] Canberra Hlth Serv, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] ACT Hlth Directorate, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Royal Womens Hosp, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[5] Mater Pelv Hlth, POB 138, Aikenvale, Qld 4814, Australia
来源:
关键词:
antenatal care;
barriers;
intimate partner violence;
obstetrician;
screening;
ABUSE;
ATTITUDES;
WOMEN;
D O I:
10.1111/ajo.13747
中图分类号:
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号:
100211 ;
摘要:
IntroductionIntimate partner violence (IPV) disproportionally affects women compared to men. The impact of IPV is amplified during pregnancy. Screening or enquiry in the antenatal outpatient setting regarding IPV has been fraught with barriers that prevent recognition and the ability to intervene.AimsThe aim of this systematic review was to determine the barriers that face obstetricians/gynaecologists regarding enquiry of IPV in antenatal outpatient settings. The secondary objective was to determine facilitators.MethodsPrimary evidence was searched using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Maternity and Infant Care, PubMed and Proquest from 1993 to May 2023. The included studies comprised empirical studies published in English language targeting a population of doctors providing antenatal outpatient care. The review was PROSPERO-registered (CRD42020188994). Independent screening and review was performed by two authors. The findings were analysed thematically.ResultsNine studies addressing barriers and two studies addressing facilitators were included: three focus-group or semi-structured interviews, six surveys and two randomised controlled trials. Barriers for providers centred at the system level (time, training), provider level (personal beliefs, cultural bias, experience) and provider-perceived patient level (fear of offending, patient readiness to disclose). Increased experience and the use of validated tools were strong facilitators.ConclusionBarriers to screening reflect multi-level obstruction to the identification of women exposed to IPV. Although the antenatal outpatient clinic setting addresses a particular population vulnerable to IPV, the barriers for obstetricians are not unique. The use of validated cueing tools provides an evidence-based method to facilitate enquiry of IPV among antenatal women, assisting in identification by clinicians. Together with education and human resources, such aids build capacity in women and obstetric providers.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 27
页数:9
相关论文