Postpartum readmission for hypertension and pre-eclampsia: development and validation of a predictive model

被引:3
|
作者
Venkatesh, K. K. [1 ,8 ]
Jelovsek, J. E. [2 ]
Hoffman, M. [3 ]
Beckham, A. J. [4 ]
Bitar, G. [3 ]
Friedman, A. M. [5 ]
Boggess, K. A. [6 ]
Stamilio, D. M. [7 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durham, NC USA
[3] Christiana Care, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Newark, DE USA
[4] WakeMed Hlth & Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Raleigh, NC USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Wake Forest Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Winston Salem, NC USA
[8] Ohio State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, 395 West 12th Ave,Floor 5, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
hypertension; postpartum readmission; predict; predictive model; pre-eclampsia; RISK; ECLAMPSIA; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17572
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To develop a model for predicting postpartum readmission for hypertension and pre-eclampsia at delivery discharge and assess external validation or model transportability across clinical sites.Design: Prediction model using data available in the electronic health record from two clinical sites.Setting: Two tertiary care health systems from the Southern (2014-2015) and Northeastern USA (2017-2019).Population: A total of 28 201 postpartum individuals: 10 100 in the South and 18 101 in the Northeast.Methods: An internal-external cross validation (IECV) approach was used to assess external validation or model transportability across the two sites. In IECV, data from each health system were first used to develop and internally validate a prediction model; each model was then externally validated using the other health system. Models were fit using penalised logistic regression, and accuracy was estimated using discrimination (concordance index), calibration curves and decision curves. Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping with bias-corrected performance measures. Decision curve analysis was used to display potential cut points where the model provided net benefit for clinical decision-making.Main outcome measures: The outcome was postpartum readmission for either hypertension or pre-eclampsiaResults: The postpartum readmission rate for hypertension and pre-eclampsia overall was 0.9% (0.3% and 1.2% by site, respectively). The final model included six variables: age, parity, maximum postpartum diastolic blood pressure, birthweight, pre-eclampsia before discharge and delivery mode (and interaction between pre-eclampsia x delivery mode). Discrimination was adequate at both health systems on internal validation (c-statistic South: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-0.89; Northeast: 0.74; 95% CI 0.74-0.74). In IECV, discrimination was inconsistent across sites, with improved discrimination for the Northeastern model on the Southern cohort (c-statistic 0.61 and 0.86, respectively), but calibration was not adequate. Next, model updating was performed using the combined dataset to develop a new model. This final model had adequate discrimination (c-statistic: 0.80, 95% CI 0.80-0.80), moderate calibration (intercept -0.153, slope 0.960, E-max 0.042) and provided superior net benefit at clinical decision-making thresholds between 1% and 7% for interventions preventing readmission. An online calculator is provided here.Conclusions: Postpartum readmission for hypertension and pre-eclampsia may be accurately predicted but further model validation is needed. Model updating using data from multiple sites will be needed before use across clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:1531 / 1540
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Does gestational hypertension become pre-eclampsia?
    Saudan, P
    Brown, MA
    Buddle, ML
    Jones, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1998, 105 (11): : 1177 - 1184
  • [32] FAMILIAL ASPECTS OF PRE-ECLAMPSIA AND HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY
    ADAMS, EM
    FINLAYSON, A
    LANCET, 1961, 2 (721): : 1375 - &
  • [33] Induced labour for pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension
    Johnson, Donna D.
    LANCET, 2009, 374 (9694): : 951 - 952
  • [34] Hypertension: A test to predict early pre-eclampsia
    Lucchese B.
    Nature Reviews Nephrology, 2009, 5 (8) : 432 - 432
  • [35] MALIGNANT HYPERTENSION SUPERVENING RAPIDLY ON PRE-ECLAMPSIA
    COUNIHAN, TB
    DONIACH, I
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE, 1954, 61 (04): : 449 - +
  • [36] Diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for pre-eclampsia in patients with established hypertension and chronic kidney disease
    Bramham, Kate
    Seed, Paul T.
    Lightstone, Liz
    Nelson-Piercy, Catherine
    Gill, Carolyn
    Webster, Philip
    Poston, Lucilla
    Chappell, Lucy C.
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 89 (04) : 874 - 885
  • [37] Methodological issues in the development of a prediction model for pre-eclampsia complications
    Ewelina Rogozinska
    Fiona Fong
    Shakila Thangaratinam
    John Allotey
    Julie Dodds
    Sally Kerry
    Nadine Marlin
    Khalid Khan
    Trials, 14 (Suppl 1)
  • [38] Development and validation of a predictive model for postpartum endometritis
    Wang, Xiujuan
    Shao, Hui
    Liu, Xueli
    Feng, Lili
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):
  • [39] Predictive value of ophthalmic artery Doppler velocimetry in relation to development of pre-eclampsia
    Matias, D. S.
    Costa, R. F.
    Matias, B. S.
    Gordiano, L.
    Correia, L. C. L.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 44 (04) : 419 - 426
  • [40] Peripartum screening for postpartum cardiovascular impairment in women with pre-eclampsia
    Giorgione, Veronica
    Di Fabrizio, Carolina
    Khalil, Asma
    O'Driscoll, Jamie
    Thilaganathan, Basky
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 129 : 68 - 68