A Deep Gaussian Process Approach for Predictive Maintenance

被引:13
|
作者
Zeng, Junqi [1 ]
Liang, Zhenglin [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Maintenance engineering; Kernel; Predictive models; Global Positioning System; Costs; Predictive maintenance; Random variables; Deep Gaussian process (DGP); Gaussian process (GP); prediction algorithms; predictive maintenance (PdM); remaining life assessment; REMAINING USEFUL LIFE; PROCESS REGRESSION; MEMORY;
D O I
10.1109/TR.2022.3199924
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In the era of digitalization, ubiquitous sensing technologies have paved the way for predicting the remaining useful life (RUL) of assets or systems. In both practical and theoretical fields, enabled by machine learning algorithms, predictive maintenance (PdM) has attracted significant attention. Among machine learning algorithms, deep learning benefits from its multilayer architecture for performing feature engineering. It provides high-quality results in an efficient manner and has become a prevalent approach. However, only predicting the expected RUL is insufficient. For practically implementing PdM approaches, both the overestimating and underestimating prediction risks should also be analyzed and mitigated before making maintenance decisions. In this article, we propose a deep Gaussian process approach to predict the expected RUL and estimate the associated variance. The approach adopts the multilayer architecture such that the predicted result is robust against the selection of kernel functions. Several novel evaluation metrics are introduced to evaluate the predicted RUL distribution. To realize a complete framework of PdM, enabled by the RUL distribution, we propose a distribution-based cost minimization algorithm to dynamically optimize the predicted maintenance thresholds. The overall approach is tested with two practical datasets.
引用
收藏
页码:916 / 933
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Predictive maintenance for spud condition monitoring in cutter suction dredgers using Gaussian process emulation
    Barik, C. R.
    Vijayan, K.
    SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2024,
  • [12] An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process
    Huynh, K. T.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 213 (213)
  • [13] Predictive Control and Communication Co-Design: A Gaussian Process Regression Approach
    Girgis, Abanoub M.
    Park, Jihong
    Liu, Chen-Feng
    Bennis, Mehdi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SIGNAL PROCESSING ADVANCES IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS (IEEE SPAWC2020), 2020,
  • [14] A Deep Learning Approach for Data-Driven Predictive Maintenance of Rolling Bearings
    Neto, Domicio
    Henriques, Jorge
    Gil, Paulo
    Teixeira, Cesar
    Cardoso, Alberto
    CONTROLO 2022, 2022, 930 : 587 - 598
  • [15] Predictive control with Gaussian process models
    Kocijan, J
    Murray-Smith, R
    Rasmussen, CE
    Likar, B
    IEEE REGION 8 EUROCON 2003, VOL A, PROCEEDINGS: COMPUTER AS A TOOL, 2003, : 352 - 356
  • [16] Integrated approach to predictive maintenance
    Howieson, Donald
    Bates, Andrew
    Noise and Vibration Worldwide, 1994, 25 (12):
  • [17] Developing an Improved Ensemble Learning Approach for Predictive Maintenance in the Textile Manufacturing Process
    Hung, Yu-Hsin
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (23)
  • [18] Gaussian process regression with heteroscedastic noises - A machine-learning predictive variance approach
    Li, Zhenxing
    Hong, Xiaodan
    Hao, Kuangrong
    Chen, Lei
    Huang, Biao
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2020, 157 : 162 - 173
  • [19] Predictive Maintenance for Edge-Based Sensor Networks: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach
    Ong, Kevin Shen Hoong
    Niyato, Dusit
    Yuen, Chau
    2020 IEEE 6TH WORLD FORUM ON INTERNET OF THINGS (WF-IOT), 2020,
  • [20] Gaussian process model based predictive control
    Kocijan, J
    Murray-Smith, R
    Rasmussen, CE
    Girard, A
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2004 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-6, 2004, : 2214 - 2219