What Breast Cancer Screening Program do Rural Women Prefer? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Jiangsu, China

被引:0
|
作者
Sun, Yanjun [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yiping [3 ]
Zhang, Huiying [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Zhiqing [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Yuhao [1 ,2 ]
He, Yuan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Inst Med Humanities, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Marxism, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Nursing, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Med Univ, Key Res Base Philosophy & Social Sci, Res Ctr Social Risk Management Major Publ Hlth Eve, Univ Jiangsu, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Med Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; DECISION-MAKING; HEALTH-CARE; ATTRIBUTES; CONJOINT; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-024-00684-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundChinese rural women aged 35-64 years are encouraged to complete breast cancer screening (BCS) free of charge. However, it is challenging to reach a satisfying BCS uptake rate. In this study, rural women's preferences and preferences heterogeneity were measured for the development of strategies to enhance participation in BCS.MethodsA cross-sectional survey with a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted via convenience sampling via face-to-face interviews in Jiangsu, China. Six DCE attributes were identified through a systematic literature review; our previous study of Chinese rural women's BCS intentions; a qualitative work involving in-depth interviews with rural women (n = 13), medical staff (n = 4), and health care managers (n = 2); and knowledge of realistic and actionable policy. The D-efficient design was generated using Ngene 1.3.0. A mixed logit model (MXL) in Stata 18.0 was used to estimate the main effect of attribute levels on rural women's preferences. The relative importance and willingness to utilize BCS services (WTU) were also estimated. The heterogeneous preferences were analyzed by a latent class model (LCM). Sociodemographic status was used to predict the characteristics of class membership. The WTU for different classes was also calculated.ResultsA total of 451 rural women, aged 35-64 years, were recruited. The MXL results revealed that the screening interval (SI) was the most important attribute for rural women with regard to utilizing BCS services, followed by the level of screening, the attitude of medical staff, ways to get knowledge and information, people who recommend screening, and time spent on screening (TSS). Rural women preferred a BCS service with a shorter TSS; access to knowledge and information through multiple approaches; a shorter SI; a recommendation from medical staff or workers from the village or community, and others; the enthusiasm of medical staff; and medical staff with longer tenures in the field. Two classes named "process driven" and "efficiency driven" were identified by the preference heterogeneity analysis of the LCM.ConclusionThere is a higher uptake of breast cancer screening when services are tailored to women's preferences. The screening interval was the most important attribute for rural women in China with a preference for a yearly screening interval versus longer intervals.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 378
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The future of breast cancer screening: what do participants in a breast cancer screening program think about automation using artificial intelligence?
    Jonmarker, Olof
    Strand, Fredrik
    Brandberg, Yvonne
    Lindholm, Peter
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA OPEN, 2019, 8 (12)
  • [42] Understanding what women want: eliciting preference for delivery health facility in a rural subcounty in Kenya, a discrete choice experiment
    Oluoch-Aridi, Jackline
    Adam, Mary B.
    Wafula, Francis
    Kokwaro, Gilbert
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [43] INDIVIDUALS' PREFERENCES FOR ESOPHAGEAL CANCER SCREENING STRATEGIES - A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Peters, Yonne
    van Grinsven, Evi
    van de Haterd, Michelle
    van Lankveld, Daan
    Verbakel, Juul
    Siersema, Peter D.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB468 - AB468
  • [44] Men’s preferences for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment
    E W de Bekker-Grob
    J M Rose
    B Donkers
    M-L Essink-Bot
    C H Bangma
    E W Steyerberg
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2013, 108 : 533 - 541
  • [45] PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR GENETIC SCREENING FOR COLORECTAL CANCER: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Veldwijk, J.
    Lambooij, M. S.
    Bredenoord, A.
    van Kranen, H.
    Dekker, E.
    Kallenberg, F.
    Smit, H. A.
    de Wit, G. A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A647 - A647
  • [46] Stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a discrete choice experiment
    Kromm, Seija K.
    Heitman, Steven J.
    Hilsden, Robert J.
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    McGregor, S. Elizabeth
    Currie, Gillian R.
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 130 (04) : A80 - A80
  • [47] Men's preferences for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment
    de Bekker-Grob, E. W.
    Rose, J. M.
    Donkers, B.
    Essink-Bot, M-L
    Bangma, C. H.
    Steyerberg, E. W.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 108 (03) : 533 - 541
  • [48] Breast cancer screening imaging: What do we do?
    Balu-Maestro, C.
    Chapellier, C.
    Souci, J.
    Caramella, T.
    Marcotte-Bloch, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2010, 39 (01): : 3 - 10
  • [49] Preferences for genetic testing for colorectal cancer within a population-based screening program: a discrete choice experiment
    Veldwijk, Jorien
    Lambooij, Mattijs S.
    Kallenberg, Frank G. J.
    van Kranen, Henk J.
    Bredenoord, Annelien L.
    Dekker, Evelien
    Smit, Henriette A.
    de Wit, G. Ardine
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2016, 24 (03) : 361 - 366
  • [50] Preferences for genetic testing for colorectal cancer within a population-based screening program: a discrete choice experiment
    Jorien Veldwijk
    Mattijs S Lambooij
    Frank G J Kallenberg
    Henk J van Kranen
    Annelien L Bredenoord
    Evelien Dekker
    Henriëtte A Smit
    G Ardine de Wit
    [J]. European Journal of Human Genetics, 2016, 24 : 361 - 366