Trust in disaster resilience

被引:3
|
作者
Fornale, Elisa [1 ]
Armiero, Marco [2 ]
Odasso, Laura [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
[2] KTH, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Coll France, Paris, France
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Trust; Culture of risk; Memory; Cooperation; Multilevel governance; RISK; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1108/DPM-04-2022-0082
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeThe erosion of 'trust' (among citizens as well as within and between institutional levels) is a worrying aspect of these turbulent times in Europe and beyond. Trust (between citizens and institutions, citizens and experts, policymakers and experts, and among different levels of governance) is crucial in all dimensions of disaster resilience. Risk perceptions stem from a complex web of feedback between individuals, communities, institutions, and experts. Sometimes, institutions and experts are slow or even resistant to accepting signals and knowledge about risks coming from the grassroots. Or, it is the other way around, and citizens are skeptical about the information coming from institutions and experts. Thus, trust must work in all directions (from citizens to institutions, from experts to citizens, etc.) to build a cooperative framework for action.Design/methodology/approachOur article aims to explore the construction of trust and distrust in communities dealing with historical, actual, or potential disasters by putting forward a three-dimensional approach (societal, cooperative, and institutional). We convey the idea that less tangible aspects such as culture, contextual history, knowledge, and habits shape the perception of risk, the degree of preparedness and, ultimately, the impacts of environmental changes.FindingsThese elements affect cooperative behaviors, and it is expected that the institutional environment - which will vary across domestic, national, and regional contexts - will play a significant role in nurturing trust or distrust in relation to disaster risk.Originality/valueThis article will offer valuable insights by developing a new conceptual framework that can be translated and validated by future research.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 267
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Benchmarking Community Disaster Resilience in Nepal
    Aksha, Sanam K.
    Emrich, Christopher T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (06)
  • [32] Promoting Disaster Resilience Around the World
    Topping, Kenneth C.
    JOURNAL OF DISASTER RESEARCH, 2015, 10 (04) : 581 - 582
  • [33] SOCIAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF DISASTER RESILIENCE
    Giuliani, Luisa
    Revez, Alexandra
    Sparf, Jorgen
    Jayasena, Suranga
    Faber, Michael Havbro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2016, 20 (03) : 277 - 290
  • [34] The landscape of disaster resilience indicators in the USA
    Susan L. Cutter
    Natural Hazards, 2016, 80 : 741 - 758
  • [35] Trust in Social Media for Disaster Management
    McCarthy, Sadhbh
    Mackin, Martin
    LREC 2014 - NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, 2014,
  • [36] Privatization of the public trust: Devolution or disaster?
    Gabriele, R
    Guida, A
    BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE TOMORROW, 1998, 7 (01): : 34 - +
  • [37] A Community Disaster Resilience Index for Chile
    Bronfman, Nicolas C.
    Castaneda, Javiera V.
    Guerrero, Nikole F.
    Cisternas, Pamela
    Repetto, Paula B.
    Martinez, Carolina
    Chamorro, Alondra
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [38] INVESTMENT IN DISASTER RESILIENCE IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT
    Perera, Srinath
    Lill, Irene
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, 2016, 20 (03) : 221 - 223
  • [39] Resilience in disaster research: three versions
    Dahlberg, Rasmus
    Johannessen-Henry, Christine Tind
    Raju, Emmanuel
    Tulsiani, Suhella
    CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 32 (1-2) : 44 - 54
  • [40] Ambivalence towards discourse of disaster resilience
    Ruszczyk, Hanna A.
    DISASTERS, 2019, 43 (04) : 818 - 839