The 12 October 2021, MW=6.4, Zakros, Crete earthquake

被引:0
|
作者
Lentas, Konstantinos [1 ]
Gkarlaouni, Charikleia [1 ]
Kalligeris, Nikos [1 ]
Melis, Nikolaos S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Observ Athens, Inst Geodynam, Athens 11810, Greece
关键词
Body waves; Earthquake location; Earthquake source observations; Fault slip; Seismicity; HELLENIC SUBDUCTION ZONE; TECTONIC DEVELOPMENT; FOCAL MECHANISMS; STRESS-FIELD; DEFORMATION; PARAMETERS; EVOLUTION; INFERENCE; TSUNAMI; TIMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10950-023-10182-4
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We study the strong 12 October 2021, M-W=6.4, offshore Zakros, Crete earthquake, and its seismotectonic implications. We obtain a robust location (azimuthal gap equal to 17(degrees)) for the mainshock by combining all freely available local, regional and teleseismic phase arrivals (direct and depth phase arrivals). Based on our location and the spatial distribution of the poor aftershock sequence we parameterise the fault area as a 30 km x 20 km planar surface, and using three-component strong motion data we calculate slip models for both earthquake nodal planes. Our preferred solution shows a simple, single slip episode on a NE-SW oriented, NW shallow-dipping fault plane, instead of a N-S oriented, almost vertical nodal plane. An anti-correlation of the aftershocks spatial distribution versus the maximum slip (similar to 27 cm) of our model further supports this, although the accuracy of the aftershock hypocentral locations could be somewhat questionable. Coulomb stress changes calculated for both kinematic models do not show substantial differences, as the aftershock seismicity within the first 3 months after the mainshock is distributed along the stress shadow zone and over the stress enhanced areas developed at the southern fault edge, induced by the mainshock. The Kasos island tide gauge record analysis shows a small signal after the earthquake, but it can hardly demonstrate the existence of tsunami waves due to the low signal-to-noise ratio. Tsunami simulations computed for the two nodal planes do not yield conclusive evidence to highlight whether the causative fault plane is NE-SW oriented, NW shallow-dipping plane, or the N-S oriented plane, nevertheless, the power spectrum analysis of the NW shallow-dipping nodal plane matches the spectral peak at 8 s period and is overall closer to the spectrum of the tide gauge record. A USGS Shakemap was also produced with all available local strong motion data and EMSC testimonies. This was also investigated in an effort to document the responsible fault. The overall analysis in this study, slightly suggests a rather westward, shallow-dipping offshore fault zone, being antithetic to the main Zakros almost vertical normal fault which shapes the coast of eastern Crete and is perpendicular to the direction of Ptolemy Trench in this area. This result agrees with seismotectonic and bathymetric evidence which support the existence of approximately N-S trending grabens, east and northeast of Crete.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 61
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The seismogenic fault of the 2021 Yunnan Yangbi MS6.4 earthquake
    Li C.-Y.
    Zhang J.-Y.
    Wang W.
    Sun K.
    Shan X.-J.
    Dizhen Dizhi, 2021, 43 (03): : 706 - 721
  • [22] Spatiotemporal evolution of the 2021 MS6.4 Yangbi earthquake sequence
    Wang, Qincai
    Zhang, Jinchuan
    Wang, Zhongping
    Li, Jun
    Wang, Weijun
    EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2021, 34 (05) : 413 - 424
  • [23] Spatiotemporal evolution of the 2021 MS6.4 Yangbi earthquake sequence
    Qincai Wang
    Jinchuan Zhang
    Zhongping Wang
    Jun Li
    Weijun Wang
    Earthquake Science, 2021, 34 (05) : 413 - 424
  • [24] Study on the sequence activities of the 2021 Yangbi MS 6.4 earthquake in Yunnan
    Li, Xiaohan
    Zheng, Jianchang
    Zhang, Haijiang
    Cui, Huawei
    Li, Cuiqin
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [25] An accessible seismological dataset of 2021 Yangbi MS6.4 earthquake
    Shuguang Wang
    Hui Yang
    Weilai Wang
    Fang Wang
    Zheng Liu
    Wei Yang
    Weitao Wang
    Yunpeng Zhang
    Lu Li
    Jiupeng Hu
    Xiaobin Li
    Wenjian Cha
    Beng Ye
    Hongbo Zhu
    Jun Yang
    Earthquake Science, 2021, 34 (05) : 460 - 464
  • [26] Spatiotemporal Evolution of the 2018 Mw 6.4 Hualien Earthquake Sequence in Eastern Taiwan
    Liu, Shujun
    Tang, Chi-Chia
    Chen, Chieh-Hung
    Xu, Rui
    SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 90 (04) : 1446 - 1456
  • [27] Rupture Process of the 7 January 2020, MW 6.4 Puerto Rico Earthquake
    Liu, Chengli
    Lay, Thorne
    Wang, Zhaozheng
    Xiong, Xiong
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (12)
  • [28] Erratum to: The Khuvsgul Earthquake of January 12, 2021 (MW= 6.7,ML= 6.9) and Early Aftershocks
    A. F. Emanov
    A. A. Emanov
    V. V. Chechel’nitskii
    E. V. Shevkunova
    Ya. B. Radziminovich
    A. V. Fateev
    E. A. Kobeleva
    E. A. Gladyshev
    V. V. Arapov
    A. I. Artemova
    V. G. Podkorytova
    Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 2022, 58 : 443 - 443
  • [29] Thermal Anomalies Observed during the Crete Earthquake on 27 September 2021
    Ghosh, Soujan
    Sasmal, Sudipta
    Maity, Sovan K.
    Potirakis, Stelios M.
    Hayakawa, Masashi
    GEOSCIENCES, 2024, 14 (03)
  • [30] Kinematic GNSS inversion of the large afterslip (Mw 6.4) following the 2019 Mw 6.2 Hualien earthquake (Taiwan)
    Lin, Hsiao-Fan
    Canitano, Alexandre
    Hsu, Ya-Ju
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2024, 12