Coupled Oscillators in an Agroecosystem: Integrating Direct and Indirect Effects

被引:0
|
作者
Vandermeer, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
AMERICAN NATURALIST | 2023年 / 202卷 / 03期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
coupled oscillators; communities; agroecosystem; ANT; MUTUALISM; POPULATION; PREY; PSEUDACTEON; PATTERN; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1086/725439
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Agricultural pests are increasingly appreciated as subjects of ecology. One particular case, a pest in coffee production, is analyzed here using the conceptual framework of complex systems, increasingly acknowledged as having an obvious home in the field of ecology, notorious for its complex structures. The particular case analyzed here arguably falls under the control of the complexity of the ecological system rather than of a simple magic bullet of population regulation. The system, which has been under study in southern Mexico for the past quarter century, is analyzed through the lens of neutral oscillations of the classical nondissipative Lotka-Volterra system. Based on three consumer/resource pairs (populations of [1] an ant, [2] a scale insect, [3] a beetle predator of the scale insect, [4] a fungal pathogen of the scale insect, and [5] a fly parasitoid of the ant), this five-dimensional system is well known qualitatively. Coupling all agents through both direct effects and trait-mediated indirect effects, the behavior of the neutral oscillation form of the system reveals a complex set of behaviors, including harmonized invariant sets, chaos, and/or quasiperiodicity. Such behaviors are well-known subjects in the science of complex systems and, it is argued, are ultimately sufficient to effect a degree of regulation on the pest, independent of explicit density-dependent feedback. Control of the system is thus seen as arguably actuated through its complexity, independent of any classic dissipative force.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 301
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Alteration of direct and indirect effects of cytomegalovirus
    Kamar, Nassim
    Mengelle, Catherine
    Rostaing, Lionel
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 5 (02) : 727 - 730
  • [32] DIRECT, INDIRECT AND SPURIOUS EFFECTS - REPLY
    PAULSON, SK
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1975, 20 (02) : 297 - 297
  • [33] DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON BACTERIOPHAGE
    DEWEY, DL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY AND RELATED STUDIES IN PHYSICS CHEMISTRY AND MEDICINE, 1969, 16 (01): : 59 - &
  • [34] Direct and Indirect Genetic Effects on Aggression
    van der Laan, Camiel M.
    van de Weijer, Steve G. A.
    Pool, Rene
    Hottenga, Jouke-Jan
    van Beijsterveldt, Toos C. E. M.
    Willemsen, Gonneke
    Bartels, Meike
    Nivard, Michel G.
    Boomsma, Dorret I.
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY: GLOBAL OPEN SCIENCE, 2023, 3 (04): : 958 - 968
  • [35] Direct and Indirect Effects in a Survival Context
    Lange, Theis
    Hansen, Jorgen V.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (04) : 575 - 581
  • [36] Religion and Euroscepticism: Direct, Indirect or No Effects?
    Boomgaarden, Hajo G.
    Freire, Andre
    WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2009, 32 (06) : 1240 - 1265
  • [37] DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT REINFORCEMENT
    WEINER, EA
    WEINER, BJ
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1973, 32 (03) : 899 - 902
  • [38] DIRECT AND INDIRECT VASCULAR EFFECTS OF NICOTINE
    KLENSCH, H
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 1974, 63 (06): : 494 - 510
  • [39] Direct and indirect effects of influenza vaccination
    Martin Eichner
    Markus Schwehm
    Linda Eichner
    Laetitia Gerlier
    BMC Infectious Diseases, 17
  • [40] EVALUATING DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS IN ECOSYSTEMS
    PILETTE, R
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1989, 133 (02): : 303 - 307