The effects of using intermittent metal part reinforcement and countersink on the strength of adhesively bonded joints

被引:3
|
作者
Calik, Ahmet [1 ]
Akpinar, Salih [2 ]
Demiral, Murat [3 ]
机构
[1] Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-15200 Burdur, Turkiye
[2] Erzurum Tech Univ, Dept Mech Engn, TR-25050 Erzurum, Turkiye
[3] Amer Univ Middle East, Coll Engn & Technol, Kuwait, Kuwait
关键词
Adhesive; Strength; Intermittent metal reinforced joint; Countersunk reinforced joint; Mechanical testing; Joints; /joining; LAP JOINTS; BEHAVIOR; ANGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103613
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This study investigates the impact of two innovative methods, namely, intermittent metal part reinforcement and countersinking, on the strength of single lap joints (SLJs). In the former method, metal inserts are strategically integrated within the adhesive layer, while the latter involves the application of countersinks on the adherends to create conical depressions for adhesive application. The metal inserts and countersink samples were fabricated using a 5-axis CNC milling machine. Subsequently, the joints were produced by subjecting the samples to 0.15 MPa pressure and 70 degrees C temperature for 120 min with the aid of a hot press. Tensile tests were conducted on single lap joints (SLJs) featuring five different configurations of intermittent metal part reinforcement joints (IMRJs) with varying sizes and positions of reinforcements, as well as six countersunk reinforced joints (CRJs) with different orientations of countersinks, all while keeping the width and overlap length constant. A two-dimensional finite element (FE) model of the IMRJ was constructed using ABAQUS software, incorporating cohesive zone elements to simulate the behavior of the adhesive layer (DP 460). The model's accuracy was confirmed through experimental verification. Additionally, fractographic analysis of the failure surfaces of both types of joints was carried out. The inclusion of IMRJs and CRJs in the SLJs increased their load-carrying capacity by more than 10 % and 30 %, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Towards enhancing peel strength of adhesively bonded joints
    Ameen, W.
    Darwish, S. M.
    AlSamhan, A.
    2015 GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON POLYMER AND COMPOSITE MATERIALS (PCM2015), 2015, 87
  • [32] Influence of adherend properties on the strength of adhesively bonded joints
    Banea, Mariana D.
    MRS BULLETIN, 2019, 44 (08) : 625 - 629
  • [33] The Effects of Width on the Strength of Adhesively Bonded Z Joints Subjected to Tensile Loads
    Adin, Hamit
    Turgut, Aydin
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 2013, 89 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [34] Adhesively bonded joints between FRP sandwich and metal: Different concepts and their strength behaviour
    VTT Manufacturing Technology, Finland
    VTT Tied Valt Tek Tutkimuskeskus, 1862 (X-44):
  • [35] Strength prediction of adhesively bonded joints using plastic zone size criterion
    Sahoo, P. K.
    Dattaguru, B.
    Manjunatha, C. M.
    PLASTICITY AND IMPACT MECHANICS, 2017, 173 : 1635 - 1641
  • [36] Improvement in Strength of Adhesively Bonded Single-Lap Joints Using Reinforcements
    Wang, Yuqi
    He, Xiaocong
    Xing, Baoying
    Deng, Chengjiang
    JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 2015, 91 (06): : 434 - 448
  • [37] Effects of environmental exposure on adhesively bonded joints
    Hand, H.M.
    Arah, C.O.
    McNamara, D.K.
    Mecklenburg, M.F.
    International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 1991, 11 (01): : 15 - 23
  • [38] EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE ON ADHESIVELY BONDED JOINTS
    HAND, HM
    ARAH, CO
    MCNAMARA, DK
    MECKLENBURG, MF
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 1991, 11 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [39] Effects of Surface Roughness in Adhesively Bonded CFRP Joints Using NDE
    Mane, Laxmikant S.
    Bhat, M. R.
    JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2024, 43 (02)
  • [40] The effects of graphene nanostructure reinforcement on the adhesive method and the graphene reinforcement ratio on the failure load in adhesively bonded joints
    Gultekin, Kursat
    Akpinar, Salih
    Gurses, Ahmet
    Eroglu, Zafer
    Cam, Salim
    Akbulut, Hamit
    Keskin, Zeki
    Ozel, Adnan
    COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2016, 98 : 362 - 369