Effects on crash risk of automatic emergency braking systems for pedestrians and bicyclists

被引:14
|
作者
Kullgren, Anders [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Amin, Khabat [3 ]
Tingvall, Claes [2 ]
机构
[1] Folksam Insurance Grp, Dept Res, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Mech & Maritime Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Karlstad Univ, Ctr Societal Risk Res, Karlstad, Sweden
[4] Folksam, Dept Res, Res, Bohusgatan 14, S-10660 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Automatic emergency braking; AEB; pedestrian; bicyclist; crash reduction; effectiveness; CALMING MEASURES; INFRASTRUCTURE; BENEFITS; SPEED;
D O I
10.1080/15389588.2022.2131403
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective The first automatic emergency braking (AEB) system was presented in 2003 and aimed to mitigate or reduce rear-end crashes. Since then, several AEB systems aimed to reduce other collision types have been introduced and studies have shown that they reduce crash risks. The aim with this study was to evaluate crash reductions of cars fitted with AEB systems with pedestrian detection and those with bicyclist detection. Methods The study is based on the Swedish Traffic Accident Data Acquisition that includes road traffic accidents reported by the police and by emergency hospitals. Crashes occurring between 2015 and 2020 and with cars from model years 2015 to 2020 were included. The statistical analysis used odds ratio calculations with an induced exposure approach where the outcomes of sensitive and nonsensitive crashes were studied. The sensitive crashes were hit pedestrians and bicyclists, respectively. The nonsensitive crash type in both comparisons was struck vehicles in rear-end crashes. Evaluations were also made for different light and weather conditions and for high and low speed roads. Results Seven hundred and twelve hit pedestrians and 1,105 hit bicyclists were included, and the nonsensitive crashes consisted of 1,978 vehicles. The overall reduction on crash risk for AEB with pedestrian detection was 8% (+/- 15%; ns) and for AEB with bicyclist detection it was 21% (+/- 17%). When separating for light conditions, no reduction in crash risk for AEB with pedestrian detection nor for AEB with bicyclist detection could be seen in darkness. However, in daylight and twilight conditions, AEB with pedestrian detection reduced pedestrian crash risk by 18% (+/- 19%; ns) and AEB with bicyclist detection reduced bicyclist crash risk by 23% (+/- 19%). No significant reductions could be seen when separating for weather conditions except for a 53% (+/- 31%) reduction for bicyclists in rain, fog, and snowfall. A larger reduction on high-speed roads (50-120 km/h) compared with low-speed roads (10-40 km/h) was also found. Conclusions AEB systems with bicyclist detection were found to reduce the numbers of hit bicyclists, especially in daylight and twilight conditions. In darkness, no reduction for hit pedestrians or bicyclists was found.
引用
收藏
页码:S111 / S115
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pedestrian crash risk in Western Australia for both pedestrians and drivers
    Arnold, P.K.
    Rosman, D.L.
    Thornett, M.L.
    Road and Transport Research, 1992, 1 (02): : 60 - 75
  • [22] When and How to Apply Automatic Emergency Brakes Based on Risk Perception and Professional Driver Emergency Braking Behavior
    Lai, Fei
    Huang, Chaoqun
    Jiang, Chengyue
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEHICLE DYNAMICS STABILITY AND NVH, 2023, 7 (04): : 421 - 436
  • [23] Road environment, crash type and hospitalisation of bicyclists and motorcyclists presented to emergency departments in Western Australia
    Meuleners, Lynn B.
    Lee, Andy H.
    Haworth, Claire
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2007, 39 (06): : 1222 - 1225
  • [24] Simulation of dispersion effects by considering interactions of pedestrians and bicyclists using an agent space model
    Liu, Mingwei
    Chen, Tinggui
    Matunaga, Chiaki
    Oeda, Yoshinao
    Sumi, Tomonori
    COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2022, 91
  • [25] A Novel Evaluation Methodology for Combined Performance of Warning and Braking in Crash Imminent Braking Systems
    Chien, Stanley
    Li, Lingxi
    Chen, Yaobin
    IEEE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS MAGAZINE, 2013, 5 (04) : 62 - 72
  • [26] Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates
    Cicchino, Jessica B.
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2017, 99 : 142 - 152
  • [27] EMERGENCY BRAKING SYSTEMS FOR SCHOOL BUSES
    SUPER, RK
    SAE PROGRESS IN TECHNOLOGY, 1968, 13 : 159 - &
  • [28] Legal regulation of emergency braking systems
    Breuer, Karsten
    Adam, Christoph
    VDI Berichte, 2009, (2068): : 237 - 253
  • [29] EMERGENCY BRAKING SYSTEMS FOR SCHOOL BUSES
    SUPER, RK
    SAE TRANSACTIONS, 1966, 74 : 148 - &
  • [30] Shared Control in Risk Predictive Braking Maneuver for Preventing Collisions With Pedestrians
    Saito, Yuichi
    Raksincharoensak, Pongsathorn
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT VEHICLES, 2016, 1 (04): : 314 - 324