Bridging the Digital Divide: Unraveling the Determinants of FinTech Adoption in Rural Communities

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Guo [1 ,2 ]
Peng, Qinglin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sanda Univ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Sanda Univ, Shengxiang Business Sch, 2727 Jinhai Rd, Shanghai 201209, Peoples R China
来源
SAGE OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
FinTech adoption; perceived usefulness; perceived ease of use; innovation awareness; financial awareness; rural residents; SEM; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; PERCEIVED EASE; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; USER ACCEPTANCE; SAMPLE-SIZE; DIFFUSION; AWARENESS; AVERSION; ORIGINS;
D O I
10.1177/21582440241227770
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Bridging the digital divide between urban and rural communities is critical for expanding financial inclusion. The purpose of this study is to understand the key factors driving the adoption of financial technology (FinTech) applications among rural residents. A conceptual framework is built on the basis of the technology acceptance model, along with the incorporation of innovation awareness and financial awareness. The relationships between factors are empirically validated using a structural equation modeling approach based on survey data from a sample of 386 respondents in rural communities. The results indicate that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, innovation awareness, and financial awareness can positively and significantly affect the intention to adopt FinTech applications. In addition, perceived usefulness mediates the relationship between perceived ease of use and behavioral intention. Practical implications for promoting FinTech adoption in rural areas are discussed. We investigate the key factors driving the adoption of financial technology (FinTech) applications among rural residents. The findings reveal that: (1) The extended TAM model is suitable for studying FinTech adoption in a rural context. (2) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, innovation awareness, and financial awareness positively and significantly affect the intention to adopt FinTech applications. (3) Perceived usefulness mediates the relationship between perceived ease of use and behavioral intention. We suggest that policymakers can offer education and training programs to improve financial literacy and financial awareness, promoting the use of FinTech products. FinTech products should be simple to use and navigate for rural residents who might not be as tech-savvy. It is important to foster a culture of innovation in rural areas by providing incentives for entrepreneurship and innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Digital Redlining: Poor Rural Communities' Access to Fintech and Implications for Financial Inclusion
    Friedline, Terri
    Naraharisetti, Sruthi
    Weaver, Addie
    JOURNAL OF POVERTY, 2020, 24 (5-6) : 517 - 541
  • [32] Bridging the global digital divide
    不详
    JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTION OF BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERS, 2001, 2 : 4 - 4
  • [33] Bridging the global digital divide
    Goldfarb, A
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2004, 4 (05) : 602 - 603
  • [34] Bridging of Digital Divide in Africa
    Igun, S. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION, 2011, 7 (01) : 11 - 20
  • [35] Bridging the Digital Divide in Parks
    Sitzman, Kelly
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2023, 148 (01) : 13 - 13
  • [36] Bridging the digital divide in the US
    Espin, Augusto
    Rojas, Christian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2024, 93
  • [37] Bridging the Digital Publishing Divide
    Robinson, Hal
    LOGOS-JOURNAL OF THE WORLD PUBLISHING COMMUNITY, 2020, 31 (04): : 44 - 68
  • [38] Bridging the Other Digital Divide
    Wisniewski, Jeff
    ONLINE, 2010, 34 (05): : 55 - 57
  • [39] Worldspace - Bridging the digital divide
    Butler, R.
    Davey, L.
    ABU Technical Review, 2001, (195): : 16 - 22
  • [40] Transport poverty meets the digital divide: accessibility and connectivity in rural communities
    Velaga, Nagendra R.
    Beecroft, Mark
    Nelson, John D.
    Corsar, David
    Edwards, Peter
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 21 : 102 - 112