The role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions who underwent in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy

被引:6
|
作者
Kilic, Mert [1 ]
Madendere, Serdar [1 ]
Vural, Metin [2 ]
Koseoglu, Ersin [3 ]
Balbay, Mevlana Derya [3 ]
Esen, Tarik [3 ]
机构
[1] VKF Amer Hosp, Dept Urol, Guzelbahce St 20, TR-34365 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] VKF Amer Hosp, Dept Radiol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Koc Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Biopsy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer; Prostate imaging reporting and data system;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-022-04274-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate the contribution of the size and number of the sampled lesions to the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPC) in patients who had PI-RADS 4 lesions. Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 159 patients who had PI-RADS 4 lesions and underwent In-bore MRI-Guided prostate biopsy were included. Patients with a lesion classified as Grade Group 2 and above were considered to have CSPC. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to evaluate the factors affecting the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and CSPC. Results A great majority (86.8%) of the patients were biopsy-naive. About three-fourths (71.7%) had PCa, and half (54.1%) had CSPC. When the patients were divided into three groups according to the index lesion size (< 5 mm, 5-10 mm, and > 10 mm), the prevalence of PCa was 64.3, 67.5, and 82.4% and the prevalence of CSPC was 42.9, 51.2, and 64.7%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, age, index lesion size, prostate volume (< 50 ml) and being biopsy-naive were found significant for PCa, while age and prostate volume (< 50 ml) were significant for CSPC. Conclusion The number of lesions was found to be insignificant in predicting PCa and CSPC. While the size of PI-RADS 4 lesions was significant in predicting PCa, it had no significance in detecting CSPC.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 454
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does Size Matter? A Retrospective Study Analysing the Size of PI-RADS 4 Lesions and Its Associated Prostate Cancer Positivity with Transperineal Prostate Biopsy
    Hooshyari, Ali
    Scholtz, David
    Maoate, Keu
    Robertson, Samuel
    Vermeulen, Lodewikus Petrus
    De Andrade, Luiz Gustavo Modelli
    Kawano, Paulo Roberto
    Gilling, Peter
    Fraundorfer, Mark
    Ordones, Flavio Vasconcelos
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2025, 17 : 49 - 57
  • [42] PSA DERIVED BIOMARKERS PREDICT CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT CANCER ON POST-MRI BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM (PI-RADS) CATEGORY 3 LESIONS
    Wood, Andrew M.
    Perez-Orozco, Andre
    Rabinowitz, Daniel
    Marziliano, Allison
    Ng, Terrance
    Torres, Jose
    Chacko, Nefia
    Kotamarti, Srinath
    Griffiths, Luke
    Vilaro, Jose L.
    Diefenbach, Michael
    Vira, Manish
    Hall, Simon J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E338 - E339
  • [43] Editorial for "MRI Radiomics-Based Machine Learning for Predict of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal PI-RADS 3 Lesions"
    Nketiah, Gabriel A.
    Bathen, Tone F.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (05) : 1474 - 1475
  • [44] Post Prostatectomy Pathologic Findings of Patients With Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer and no Significant PI-RADS Lesions on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging COMMENT
    Walker, Colton
    Singhal, Udit
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    UROLOGY, 2020, 146 : 187 - 188
  • [45] The impact of the relationship between lesion diameter and total core length on the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer for PI-RADS 3 lesions
    Yakut, Emrah
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [46] Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?
    Polanec, S. H.
    Bickel, H.
    Wengert, G. J.
    Arnoldner, M.
    Clauser, P.
    Susani, M.
    Shariat, S. F.
    Pinker, K.
    Helbich, T. H.
    Baltzer, P. A. T.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 75 (02) : 157.e1 - 157.e7
  • [47] Post Prostatectomy Pathologic Findings of Patients With Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer and no Significant PI-RADS Lesions on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging REPLY
    Alanee, Shaheen
    Peabody, James
    Menon, Mani
    UROLOGY, 2020, 146 : 188 - 188
  • [48] MRI-guided in-bore biopsy for prostate cancer: what does the evidence say? A case series of 554 patients and a review of the current literature
    Pokorny, Morgan
    Kua, Boon
    Esler, Rachel
    Yaxley, John
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Dunglison, Nigel
    Gianduzzo, Troy
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Holt, Ross
    Laing, Barbara
    Ault, Darren
    Brown, Nicholas
    Parkinson, Rob
    Thompson, Les
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (07) : 1263 - 1279
  • [49] MRI-guided in-bore biopsy for prostate cancer: what does the evidence say? A case series of 554 patients and a review of the current literature
    Morgan Pokorny
    Boon Kua
    Rachel Esler
    John Yaxley
    Hemamali Samaratunga
    Nigel Dunglison
    Troy Gianduzzo
    Geoff Coughlin
    Ross Holt
    Barbara Laing
    Darren Ault
    Nicholas Brown
    Rob Parkinson
    Les Thompson
    World Journal of Urology, 2019, 37 : 1263 - 1279
  • [50] Avoiding Unnecessary Systematic Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Comparison Between MRI-Based Radiomics Model and PI-RADS Category
    Cheng, Xueqing
    Chen, Yuntian
    Xu, Hui
    Ye, Lei
    Tong, Shun
    Li, Haixia
    Zhang, Tianjing
    Tian, Song
    Qi, Jin
    Zeng, Hao
    Yao, Jin
    Song, Bin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 57 (02) : 578 - 586