Methods for fungiform papillae assessment: A collaborative study among European research units

被引:0
|
作者
Piochi, Maria [1 ]
Spinelli, Sara [2 ]
Melis, Melania [3 ]
Laureati, Monica [4 ]
Feeney, Emma [5 ]
Methven, Lisa [7 ]
Yang, Qian [6 ]
Monteleone, Erminio [2 ]
Torri, Luisa [1 ]
Ford, Rebecca [6 ]
Pagliarini, Ella [4 ]
Barbarossa, Iole Tomassini [3 ]
Dinnella, Caterina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gastron Sci, Pollenzo, Italy
[2] Univ Florence, Florence, Italy
[3] Univ Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Coll Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham, England
[7] Univ Reading, Reading, England
关键词
Oral responsiveness; Manual count; Device resolution; Gender; Age; TASTE SENSITIVITY; AUTOMATED-METHOD; DENSITY; PERCEPTION; ASSOCIATIONS; INTENSITY; BITTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105076
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Fungiform papillae (FP) are the anatomical structures dedicated to gustatory and somatosensory signal triggering. Whether the density of FP (FPD = FP/cm2) is associated with oral responsiveness is controversial, and the disparity in previous findings may be partially due to the diversity in methods used to quantify FP. The present study aims at mapping methods used to estimate FPD and at tentatively assessing the impact of the main procedure variables in FPD estimation. An online survey was specifically developed and launched among the European Sensory Science Society members to collect information on methods and procedure variables and to share datasets on FP counting. Seven European research centres responded to the survey. Manual counting was the most popular methodology, and a merged dataset of 1006 observations was obtained. The type of device used for tongue picture acquisition (low-resolution -LR vs high-resolution -HR) was the main procedure variable. FPD mean values were lower when assessed by LR (35.8) than with HR devices (41.5). Distribution of FPD for LR and HR datasets were similar thus comparisons among studies in which different resolution devices have been used are reliable. Picture modifications and data validation did not significantly affect FPD estimation obtained from HR devices, while both these variables significantly affected FPD values collected with LR devices. Both HR and LR procedures were able to capture the differences in FPD due to age and gender. Overall, measures from HR devices appear the best option to depict the inter-individual variability in FPD. Automated procedures appear underutilised.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TongueSim: Development of an Automated Method for Rapid Assessment of Fungiform Papillae Density for Taste Research
    Sanyal, Shourjya
    O'Brien, Shauna M.
    Hayes, John E.
    Feeney, Emma L.
    CHEMICAL SENSES, 2016, 41 (04) : 357 - 365
  • [2] Units of measurement and collaborative European medical research
    Daly, C
    Khan, I
    MacLeod, A
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 1995, 10 (12) : 2380 - 2381
  • [3] A Systematic Research Review of Collaborative Assessment Methods
    Aschieri, Filippo
    van Emmerik, Arnold A. P.
    Wibbelink, Carlijn J. M.
    Kamphuis, Jan H.
    PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2023, 60 (03) : 355 - 369
  • [4] Quality assessment of glycopeptide susceptibility tests: A European collaborative study
    Brown, DFJ
    Courvalin, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1998, 9 (03) : 153 - 163
  • [5] Developing the midwifery Unit Self-Assessment (MUSA) Framework: A mixed methods study in six European midwifery units
    Yuill, Cassandra
    Keraudren, Shujana
    Murphy, Rosie
    Uddin, Nazihah
    Rocca-Ihenacho, Lucia
    SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCARE, 2023, 35
  • [6] Study design, sampling and assessment methods of the European study 'abuse of the elderly in the European region'
    Lindert, Jutta
    Luna, Juan
    Torres-Gonzalez, Francisco
    Barros, Henrique
    Ioannidi- Kapolou, Elli
    Quattrini, Sabrina
    Stankunas, Mindaugas
    Soares, Joaquim J. F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2012, 22 (05): : 662 - 666
  • [7] Change Research: A Case Study on Collaborative Methods for Social Workers and Advocates
    Shepard, Benjamin
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PRACTICE, 2013, 21 (1-2) : 165 - 169
  • [8] Change Research: A Case Study on Collaborative Methods for Social Workers and Advocates
    Stoecker, Randy
    SOCIAL SERVICE REVIEW, 2013, 87 (01) : 203 - 207
  • [9] The NuGO proof of principle study package: a collaborative research effort of the European Nutrigenomics Organisation
    Michela Baccini
    Eva-Maria Bachmaier
    Annibale Biggeri
    Mark V. Boekschoten
    Freek G. Bouwman
    Lorraine Brennan
    Robert Caesar
    Saverio Cinti
    Susan L. Coort
    Katie Crosley
    Hannelore Daniel
    Christian A. Drevon
    Susan Duthie
    Lars Eijssen
    Ruan M. Elliott
    Marjan van Erk
    Chris Evelo
    Mike Gibney
    Carolin Heim
    Graham W. Horgan
    Ian T. Johnson
    Thomas Kelder
    Robert Kleemann
    Teake Kooistra
    Martijn P. van Iersel
    Edwin C. Mariman
    Claus Mayer
    Gerard McLoughlin
    Michael Müller
    Francis Mulholland
    Ben van Ommen
    Abigael C. Polley
    Estelle Pujos-Guillot
    Isabel Rubio-Aliaga
    Helen M. Roche
    Baukje de Roos
    Manuela Sailer
    Giulia Tonini
    Lynda M. Williams
    Nicole de Wit
    Genes & Nutrition, 2008, 3 : 147 - 151
  • [10] The NuGO proof of principle study package: a collaborative research effort of the European Nutrigenomics Organisation
    Baccini, Michela
    Bachmaier, Eva-Maria
    Biggeri, Annibale
    Boekschoten, Mark V.
    Bouwman, Freek G.
    Brennan, Lorraine
    Caesar, Robert
    Cinti, Saverio
    Coort, Susan L.
    Crosley, Katie
    Daniel, Hannelore
    Drevon, Christian A.
    Duthie, Susan
    Eijssen, Lars
    Elliott, Ruan M.
    van Erk, Marjan
    Evelo, Chris
    Gibney, Mike
    Heim, Carolin
    Horgan, Graham W.
    Johnson, Ian T.
    Kelder, Thomas
    Kleemann, Robert
    Kooistra, Teake
    van Iersel, Martijn P.
    Mariman, Edwin C.
    Mayer, Claus
    McLoughlin, Gerard
    Mueller, Michael
    Mulholland, Francis
    van Ommen, Ben
    Polley, Abigael C.
    Pujos-Guillot, Estelle
    Rubio-Aliaga, Isabel
    Roche, Helen M.
    de Roos, Baukje
    Sailer, Manuela
    Tonini, Giulia
    Williams, Lynda M.
    de Wit, Nicole
    GENES AND NUTRITION, 2008, 3 (3-4): : 147 - 151