A Systematic Research Review of Collaborative Assessment Methods

Question: We sought to review the evidence for the effectiveness of collaborative assessment methods (CAMs), which involve working with clients during all phases of the assessment process, from the definition of the goals for the assessment to the interpretation of the testing results and to the identification of conclusions and recommendations. Findings: Our review shows that in as few as 2.7 sessions on average, assessors using CAMs have a positive impact on the treatment process, clients' symptoms, and clients' self-growth. Meaning: Collaborating throughout the assessment helps clients develop a different view of themselves, especially one that is more accurate, compassionate, and useful. The respect, collaboration, and empathic understanding of clients may be the primary mechanism of CAMs effectiveness. Next Steps: Research on the immediate effects of CAMs components is needed.