Do System of Rice Intensification Practices Produce Rice Plants Phenotypically and Physiologically Superior to Conventional Practice?

被引:8
|
作者
Thakur, Amod Kumar [1 ]
Mandal, Krishna Gopal [1 ]
Verma, Om Prakash [1 ]
Mohanty, Rajeeb Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Inst Water Management, Bhubaneswar 751023, India
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
system of rice intensification; rice; Oryza sativa; morpho-physiology; root-shoot interactions; yield; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; GRAIN-YIELD; CROP MANAGEMENT; CULTIVATION PRACTICES; FARMING SYSTEMS; SRI MANAGEMENT; LOWLAND RICE; ROOT-GROWTH; PRODUCTIVITY; SOIL;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy13041098
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The System of Rice Intensification (SRI), an agro-ecological approach to rice cultivation developed in Madagascar, has generated considerable interest worldwide. Having not been developed at a research establishment but rather from observation and testing on farmers' fields, SRI attracted considerable controversy, for example, with unwarranted objections that it lacked of scientific evidence, and being characterized as based on 'unconfirmed field observations' (UFOs). One 2004 article concluded that "the system of rice intensification does not fundamentally change the physiological yield potential of rice". This assertion was not based on any physiological examination of rice plants grown using SRI methodology, however, or on any systematic comparison with what would be considered as best management practices (BMPs), recommended practices (RPs), or farmer practices (FPs). Other dismissals of SRI have had contestable data selection, analytical methods, and presentation of results. The published literature provides abundant evidence that the earlier evaluations of SRI were either not well-informed or objective, and possibly, they discouraged others from embarking on systematic evaluations of their own. This article examines the results of 78 studies in the published literature where SRI results were explicitly compared with RPs, including BMPs or FPs. The results from 27 countries, plus several large-scale evaluations, show that in 80% of the evaluations, grain yield was higher under SRI than with RPs or FPs. SRI gave 24% higher grain yield than RPs and 56% more than FPs, while reducing seed, water, and fertilizer inputs. Beyond the descriptive evidence, this paper considers that the phenotypical changes and physiological improvements in SRI-grown rice plants could account for the reported enhancement in yield. More research remains to be undertaken to elucidate casual mechanisms, but abundant evidence shows that this is a subject deserving considerable scientific effort.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Relationships observed between Trichoderma inoculation and characteristics of rice grown under System of Rice Intensification (SRI) vs. conventional methods of cultivation
    Febri Doni
    Che Radziah Che Mohd Zain
    Anizan Isahak
    F. Fathurrahman
    Norela Sulaiman
    Norman Uphoff
    Wan Mohtar Wan Yusoff
    Symbiosis, 2017, 72 : 45 - 59
  • [42] The reasons for farmers not to adopt System of Rice Intensification (SRI) as a sustainable agricultural practice: an explorative study
    Arsil, P.
    Sahirman, S.
    Ardiansyah
    Hidayat, H. H.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2018 (ICSARD 2018), 2019, 250
  • [43] Yield, water productivity and nutrient balances under the System of Rice Intensification and Recommended Management Practices in the Sahel
    Krupnik, Timothy J.
    Shennan, Carol
    Rodenburg, Jonne
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2012, 130 : 155 - 167
  • [44] Productivity and socio-economic impact of system of rice intensification and integrated crop management over conventional methods of rice establishment in eastern Himalayas, India
    Islam, Mokidul
    Nath, L. K.
    Patel, D. P.
    Das, Anup
    Munda, G. C.
    Samajdar, Tanmay
    Ngachan, S. V.
    PADDY AND WATER ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 12 (01) : 193 - 202
  • [45] Productivity and socio-economic impact of system of rice intensification and integrated crop management over conventional methods of rice establishment in eastern Himalayas, India
    Mokidul Islam
    L. K. Nath
    D. P. Patel
    Anup Das
    G. C. Munda
    Tanmay Samajdar
    S. V. Ngachan
    Paddy and Water Environment, 2014, 12 : 193 - 202
  • [46] Farmer's appropriation of system of rice intensification practices in water-scarce irrigation schemes in Northern Tanzania
    Kavishe, Rosemary Evarist
    Kahimba, Frederick Cassian
    Komakech, Hans Charles
    PADDY AND WATER ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 19 (03) : 367 - 381
  • [47] Farmer's appropriation of system of rice intensification practices in water-scarce irrigation schemes in Northern Tanzania
    Rosemary Evarist Kavishe
    Frederick Cassian Kahimba
    Hans Charles Komakech
    Paddy and Water Environment, 2021, 19 : 367 - 381
  • [48] Stubborn facts: Still no evidence that the System of Rice Intensification out-yields best management practices (BMPs) beyond Madagascar
    McDonald, A. J.
    Hobbs, P. R.
    Riha, S. J.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2008, 108 (02) : 188 - 191
  • [49] A critical assessment of a desk study comparing crop production systems: The example of the 'system of rice intensification' versus 'best management practice'
    Uphoff, Norman
    Kassam, Amir
    Stoop, Willem
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2008, 108 (01) : 109 - 114
  • [50] Effects of long-term fertilization practices on heavy metal cadmium accumulation in the surface soil and rice plants of double-cropping rice system in Southern China
    Yilan Xu
    Haiming Tang
    Tangxing Liu
    Yifeng Li
    Xinjie Huang
    Jun Pi
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 19836 - 19844