Expertise and information: an epistemic logic perspective

被引:1
|
作者
Singleton, Joseph [1 ]
Booth, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, Wales
关键词
Expertise; Knowledge; Modal logic; Epistemic logic; TRUST; BELIEF;
D O I
10.1007/s11229-023-04064-y
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
In this paper we present a modal logic framework to reason about the expertise of information sources. A source is considered an expert on a proposition ? if they are able to correctly refute phi in any possible world where phi is false. Closely connected with expertise is a notion of soundness of information: phi is said to be "sound" if it is true up to lack of expertise of the source. That is, any statement logically weaker than phi on which the source has expertise must in fact be true. This is relevant for modelling situations in which sources make claims beyond their domain of expertise. Particular attention is paid to the connection between expertise and knowledge: we show that expertise and soundness admit precise interpretations in terms of S4 and S5 epistemic logic, under certain conditions. We go on to extend the framework to multiple sources, defining two notions of collective expertise. These also have epistemic interpretations via distributed and common knowledge from multi-agent epistemic logic. On the technical side, we give several sound and complete axiomatisations of various classes of expertise models.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A dynamic-epistemic hybrid logic for intentions and information changes in strategic games
    O. Roy
    Synthese, 2009, 171 : 291 - 320
  • [42] Quantum Information Versus Epistemic Logic: An Analysis of the Frauchiger-Renner Theorem
    Boge, Florian J.
    FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS, 2019, 49 (10) : 1143 - 1165
  • [43] A dynamic-epistemic hybrid logic for intentions and information changes in strategic games
    Roy, O.
    SYNTHESE, 2009, 171 (02) : 291 - 320
  • [44] Collaborative Assessment of Information Provider's Reliability and Expertise Using Subjective Logic
    Pelechrinis, Konstantinos
    Zadorozhny, Vladimir
    Oleshchuk, Vladimir
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COLLABORATIVE COMPUTING: NETWORKING, APPLICATIONS AND WORKSHARING (COLLABORATECOM), 2011, : 352 - 361
  • [45] Inquisitive logic as an epistemic logic of knowing how
    Wang, Haoyu
    Wang, Yanjing
    Wang, Yunsong
    ANNALS OF PURE AND APPLIED LOGIC, 2022, 173 (10)
  • [46] The Neglect of Epistemic Considerations in Logic: The Case of Epistemic Assumptions
    Sundholm, Goeran
    TOPOI-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PHILOSOPHY, 2019, 38 (03): : 551 - 559
  • [47] Dynamic Epistemic Logic Games with Epistemic Temporal Goals
    Maubert, Bastien
    Murano, Aniello
    Pinchinat, Sophie
    Schwarzentruber, Francois
    Stranieri, Silvia
    ECAI 2020: 24TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 325 : 155 - 162
  • [48] The Neglect of Epistemic Considerations in Logic: The Case of Epistemic Assumptions
    Göran Sundholm
    Topoi, 2019, 38 : 551 - 559
  • [49] Between Expertise and Fairness Considering Epistemic Proceduralism
    Colish, Will
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL THEORY, 2010, 9 (01) : 103 - 111
  • [50] Monodic epistemic predicate logic
    Sturm, H
    Wolter, F
    Zakharyaschev, M
    LOGICS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2000, 1919 : 329 - 344