Guideline-Based, Multi-Gene Panel Germline Genetic Testing for at-Risk Patients with Breast Cancer

被引:5
|
作者
Abdel-Razeq, Hikmat [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Abujamous, Lama [3 ]
Al-Azzam, Khansa [1 ]
Abu-Fares, Hala [1 ]
Hani, Hira Bani [1 ]
Alkyam, Mais [1 ]
Sharaf, Baha [1 ]
Elemian, Shatha [1 ]
Tamimi, Faris [1 ]
Abuhijla, Fawzi [4 ]
Edaily, Sarah [1 ]
Salama, Osama [1 ]
Abdulelah, Hazem [1 ]
Daoud, Rand [1 ]
Abubaker, Mohammad [1 ]
Al-Atary, Areej [5 ]
机构
[1] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Amman, Jordan
[2] Univ Jordan, Sch Med, Amman, Jordan
[3] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Cell Therapy & Appl Genom, Amman, Jordan
[4] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amman, Jordan
[5] King Hussein Canc Ctr, Dept Nursing, Amman, Jordan
[6] Univ Jordan, King Hussein Canc Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Queen Rania Al Abdullah St,POB 1269, Amman 11941, Jordan
来源
关键词
breast cancer; BRCA1; BRCA2; multigene panel; hereditary breast cancer; next generation sequencing; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; BREAST/OVARIAN CANCER; EARLY-ONSET; OLAPARIB;
D O I
10.2147/BCTT.S394092
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Genetic testing for at-risk patients with breast cancer should be routinely offered. Knowledge generated may influence both treatment decisions and cancer prevention strategies among the patients themselves and their relatives. In this study, we report on the prevalence and patterns of germline mutations, using commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based multi-gene Patients and Methods: Consecutive at-risk breast cancer patients, as determined by international guidelines, were offered germline genetic testing using a 20-gene NGS-based panel at a reference lab. Samples of peripheral blood were obtained for DNA extraction and genetic variants were classified as benign/likely benign (negative), pathogenic/likely pathogenic (positive) or variants of uncertain Results: A total of 1310 patients, median age (range) 43 (19-82) years, were enrolled. Age <= 45 years (n = 800, 61.1%) was the most common indication for testing. Positive family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancers, and triple-negative disease were among the common indications. Among the whole group, 184 (14.0%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; only 90 (48.9%) were in BRCA1 or BRCA2, while 94 (51.9%) others had pathogenic variants in other genes; mostly in APC, TP53, CHEK2 and PALB2. Mutation rates were significantly higher among patients with positive family history (p = 0.009); especially if they were 50 years or younger at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001). Patients with triple-negative disease had relatively higher rate (17.5%), and mostly in BRCA1/2 genes (71.4%). Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were reported in 559 (42.7%) patients; majority (90.7%) were in genes other than BRCA1 or BRCA2.Conclusion: Pathogenic mutations in genes other than BRCA1/2 are relatively common and could have been missed if genetic testing was restricted to BRCA1/2. The significantly high rate of VUS associated with multi-gene panel testing can be disturbing.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Cancer Genetic Panel Testing on at-Risk Individuals
    Frost, Anja S.
    Toaff, Miriam
    Biagi, Tara
    Stark, Elizabeth
    McHenry, Allison
    Kaltman, Rebecca
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 (06): : 1103 - 1110
  • [42] Update on multi-gene panel testing and communication of genetic test results
    Reid, Sonya
    Pal, Tuya
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (08): : 1513 - 1519
  • [43] Mutational Spectrum in a Multi-Gene Panel of Germline and Somatic Ovarian Cancer in Singapore
    Ho, S.
    Chiu, L.
    Poon, K.
    Tan, K. M.
    Png, T. S.
    Tan, D. S.
    Lee, S.
    Koay, E. S.
    Yen, B.
    Yan, B.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2017, 19 (06): : 1024 - 1024
  • [44] IMPROVING GERMLINE TESTING IN AT-RISK PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER
    Javier-DesLoges, Juan
    Flores, Pimentel Ana
    Chen, Yu-Wei
    Yasoda, Satpathy
    Michael, Randall James
    Christopher, Kane
    Lisa, Madlensky
    Matthew, Savage
    Samuel, Pena
    Tyler, Stewart
    Aditya, Bagrodia
    Rana, Mckay
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2025, 43 (03)
  • [45] Routine genetic screening with a multi-gene panel in patients with pheochromocytomas
    Sbardella, Emilia
    Cranston, Treena
    Isidori, Andrea M.
    Shine, Brian
    Pal, Aparna
    Jafar-Mohammadi, Bahram
    Sadler, Greg
    Mihai, Radu
    Grossman, Ashley B.
    ENDOCRINE, 2018, 59 (01) : 175 - 182
  • [46] High frequency of germline variants in CFTR identified in PDAC patients enrolled in an expanded panel multi-gene panel testing program
    Hendifar, Andrew
    Hitchins, Megan
    Lauzon, Marie
    Hatchell, Kathryn E.
    Heald, Brandie
    Pandol, Stephen
    Naren, Anjaparavanda P.
    Osipov, Arsen
    HPB, 2024, 26 (08) : 1082 - 1085
  • [47] Routine genetic screening with a multi-gene panel in patients with pheochromocytomas
    Emilia Sbardella
    Treena Cranston
    Andrea M. Isidori
    Brian Shine
    Aparna Pal
    Bahram Jafar-Mohammadi
    Greg Sadler
    Radu Mihai
    Ashley B. Grossman
    Endocrine, 2018, 59 : 175 - 182
  • [48] Mutation screening of Bulgarian hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients with multi-gene cancer panel
    Mitkova, A.
    Dodova, R.
    Pencheva, D.
    Vlahova, A.
    Taushanova-Hadjieva, M.
    Valev, S.
    Timcheva, K.
    Christova, S.
    Mitev, V.
    Kaneva, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 61 : S37 - S37
  • [49] Differences in the benefit of multi-gene panel (MGP) genetic testing between African American and white women with invasive breast cancer
    Whitaker, Kristen
    Ventriglia, Nicole
    Devarajan, Karthik
    Obeid, Elias
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 81 (04)
  • [50] Germline Genetic Mutations in a Multi-center Contemporary Cohort of 550 Phyllodes Tumors: An Opportunity for Expanded Multi-gene Panel Testing
    Laura H. Rosenberger
    Samantha M. Thomas
    Suniti N. Nimbkar
    Tina J. Hieken
    Kandice K. Ludwig
    Lisa K. Jacobs
    Megan E. Miller
    Kristalyn K. Gallagher
    Jasmine Wong
    Heather B. Neuman
    Jennifer Tseng
    Taryn E. Hassinger
    James W. Jakub
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 3633 - 3640