Agricultural emission reduction targets at country and global levels: a bottom-up analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Jensbye, Laerke Godsk [1 ]
Yu, Wusheng [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
关键词
Climate change mitigation; agriculture; national determined contributions; cluster analysis; emission pathway development; emissions scenario construction; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; PARIS AGREEMENT; FOOD; IMPACTS; COULD;
D O I
10.1080/14693062.2023.2267021
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Few countries have declared sector-specific emission reduction targets in agriculture, making it difficult to construct and assess realistic climate mitigation scenarios for analytical and policymaking purposes. We aim to fill this analytical gap by using a set of cluster analyses to gauge likely ambitions levels in reducing agricultural emission at country-level, taking into consideration important country-level characteristics and referencing the 'common but differentiated responsibilities' principle. We then use the results from the cluster analysis together with information from submitted NDCs and other considerations to design formulas for assigning numerical reduction targets to individual countries. Our main results indicate a global agricultural emission level in 2030 exceeding the limit for the 1.5 degrees C temperature target, but representing substantially lower emissions than the no-policy scenario. At individual country-level, the scenarios consist of large emission reductions in Northern and Western Europe, followed by the USA and other developed economies, and emission increases in many developing countries. To facilitate the construction of alternative scenarios, our method also contains parameters for flexibility to scale up or down ambition levels at both country and global levels, making the method useful for other researchers to develop alternative scenarios. Agricultural emission targets at country and global level are needed for analysing the likely impacts of agricultural decarbonizationOnly 10% of Paris Agreement parties have specific pledges limiting agricultural emissions, indicating an uncertain decarbonization pathway and hindering international climate cooperationOur analysis based on the need, intent, readiness, and scope indicators can guide the construction of plausible mitigation scenarios at country and global levelsBy revealing factors that limit mitigation ambitions, our results can be used to develop instruments at country/multilateral levels to incentivize setting ambitious targetsGlobal agricultural emissions in 2030 in our 'plausible' scenario exceeds the 1.5 degrees C target, pointing to the need for enhanced global ambition
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 457
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of national greenhouse gas mitigation targets for 2030 through meta-analysis of bottom-up energy and emission scenarios: A case of Japan
    Kuramochi, Takeshi
    Wakiyama, Takako
    Kuriyama, Akihisa
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 77 : 924 - 944
  • [32] Impact of spatial proxies on the representation of bottom-up emission inventories: A satellite-based analysis
    Geng, Guannan
    Zhang, Qiang
    Martin, Randall V.
    Lin, Jintai
    Huo, Hong
    Zheng, Bo
    Wang, Siwen
    He, Kebin
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2017, 17 (06) : 4131 - 4145
  • [33] Comprehensive analysis of carbon emission reduction technologies (CRTs) in China's coal-fired power sector: A bottom-up approach
    Wang, Xutao
    Zhao, Xinxu
    Yang, Yang
    Shao, Yuhao
    Zhang, Li
    Ni, Yu
    Pan, Jun
    Zhang, Yongxin
    Zheng, Chenghang
    Gao, Xiang
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2024, 202
  • [34] Including bottom-up emission abatement technologies in a large-scale global economic model for policy assessments
    Weitzel, Matthias
    Saveyn, Bert
    Vandyck, Toon
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 83 : 254 - 263
  • [35] CO2 emission reduction costs in the residential sector: Behavioral parameters in a bottom-up simulation model
    Jaccard, M
    Bailie, A
    Nyboer, J
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 1996, 17 (04): : 107 - 134
  • [36] Comparison of top-down and bottom-up estimates of sectoral and regional greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Hoogwijk, Monique
    Barker, Terry
    Riahi, Keywan
    Boeters, Stefan
    Chateau, Jean
    Scrieciu, Serban
    van Vliet, Jasper
    Masui, Toshihiko
    Blok, Kornelis
    Blomen, Eliane
    Kram, Tom
    ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) : 5125 - 5139
  • [37] Improvement China Point Source for Improving Bottom-Up Emission Inventory
    Jang, Youjung
    Lee, Yungu
    Kim, Jinseok
    Kim, Younha
    Woo, Jung-Hun
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2020, 56 (01) : 107 - 118
  • [38] Improvement China Point Source for Improving Bottom-Up Emission Inventory
    Youjung Jang
    Yungu Lee
    Jinseok Kim
    Younha Kim
    Jung-Hun Woo
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2020, 56 : 107 - 118
  • [39] A bottom-up agricultural emissions inventory and its analysis via CMAQ and IASI-NH3
    Akyuz, Ezgi
    Cingiroglu, Fulya
    Kaynak, Burcak
    Unal, Alper
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 950
  • [40] Bottom-up performance analysis of HS/SW platforms
    Richter, K
    Ziegenbein, D
    Jersak, M
    Ernst, R
    DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTED EMBEDDED SYSTEMS, 2002, 91 : 173 - 183