The short- and long-term outcomes in living-donor liver transplantation using small-for-size graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Ki-Hun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sang-Hoon [1 ]
Cho, Hwui-Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Surg,Div Liver Transplantat & Hepatobiliary S, Seoul, South Korea
[2] 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
Graft -to -recipient weight ratio; Living -donor liver transplantation; Small -for -size graft; Small -for -size syndromes; meta; -analysis; RECIPIENT WEIGHT RATIO; PORTAL FLOW; MODULATION; INFLOW; IMPACT; VOLUME; PROGNOSIS; RISKS; VEIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.trre.2023.100747
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: A standard graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) >= 0.8% is widely accepted in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, the potential donor pool is expanded to patients adopting small-for-size graft (SFSGs) with GRWR <0.8%. This study aimed to investigate the effect of SFSG on short-and long-term outcomes following LDLT. Methods: Electronic databases were searched from January 1995 to January 2022 for studies comparing short-or long-term outcomes between patients with SFSG (GRWR <0.8%, SFSG group) and sufficient volume graft (GRWR >= 0.8%, non-SFSG group). The primary outcomes were one-, three-, and five-year overall survival (OS) and graft survival (GS), while the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. Results: Twenty-four studies comprising 7996 patients were included. In terms of OS, SFSG group had poor three-year OS (HR: 1.48, 95% CI [1.01, 2.15], p = 0.04), but there were no significant differences between two groups in one-year OS (HR: 1.50, 95% CI [0.98, 2.29], p = 0.06) and five-year OS (HR: 1.40, 95% CI [0.95, 2.08], p = 0.02). In GS, there were no significant differences in one-year (HR 1.31, 95% CI [1.00, 1.72], p = 0.05), three-year (HR 1.33, 95% CI [0.97, 1.82], p = 0.07), and five-year GS (HR 1.17, 95% CI [0.95, 1.44], p = 0.13). The SFSG group had comparable postoperative complications, except for a high incidence of vascular complications and small-for-size syndromes. Conclusions: Expanding the potential donor pool in LDLT to SFSG with GRWR <0.8% can be acceptable in terms of comparable long-term OS and GS, despite the risk for vascular complications and small-for-size syndrome.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Long-Term Outcomes After Splenectomy for Small-For-Size Syndrome in Live Donor Liver Transplantation
    Dib, Martin
    Goldaracena, Nicolas
    Marquez, Max
    Barbas, Andrew
    Sapisochin, Gonzalo
    Beriault, Cheryl
    Selzner, Nazia
    McGilvray, Ian
    Renner, Eberhard
    Greig, Paul
    Lilly, Les
    Ghanekar, Anand
    Cattral, Mark
    Selzner, Markus
    Grant, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 : 78 - 79
  • [22] Adult living-donor lobar lung transplant using a small-for-size graft
    Nakajima, Daisuke
    Sakanoue, Ichiro
    Kayawake, Hidenao
    Sumitomo, Ryota
    Nishikawa, Shigeto
    Tanaka, Satona
    Yutaka, Yojiro
    Menju, Toshi
    Date, Hiroshi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 66 (06)
  • [23] Short- and long-term outcomes in infective endocarditis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abegaz, Tadesse Melaku
    Bahagavathula, Akshaya Srikanth
    Gebreyohannes, Eyob Alemayehu
    Mekonnen, Alemayehu B.
    Abebe, Tamrat Befekadu
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2017, 17
  • [24] Short- and long-term outcomes in infective endocarditis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tadesse Melaku Abegaz
    Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula
    Eyob Alemayehu Gebreyohannes
    Alemayehu B. Mekonnen
    Tamrat Befekadu Abebe
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 17
  • [25] Inflammatory cardiomyopathies: short- and long-term outcomes after heart transplantation—a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Emanuele Bobbio
    Marie Lingbrant
    Bright I Nwaru
    Eva Hessman
    Jukka Lehtonen
    Kristjan Karason
    Entela Bollano
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2020, 25 : 481 - 485
  • [26] Strategies for improving the outcomes of small-for-size grafts in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation
    Imura, Satoru
    Shimada, Mitsuo
    Ikegami, Toru
    Morine, Yuji
    Kanemura, Hirofumi
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY, 2008, 15 (02): : 102 - 110
  • [27] Right liver graft causes less degree of small-for-size syndrome in adult living-donor liver transplantation.
    Cho, YB
    Suh, KS
    Lee, HW
    Cho, EH
    Yang, SH
    Cho, JY
    Yi, NJ
    Lee, KU
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 12 (05) : C33 - C33
  • [28] Outcomes of Small-for-size Grafts in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Klair, Tarunjeet
    Przybyszewski, Eric
    Samstein, Benjamin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 : 71 - 72
  • [29] THE OUTCOMES OF ADULT LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION WITH SMALL-FOR-SIZE GRAFTS
    Ohtsuka, Masayuki
    Shimizu, Hiroaki
    Kato, Atsushi
    Yoshitomi, Hideyuki
    Furukawa, Katsunori
    Kuboki, Satoshi
    Miyazaki, Masaru
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 : 185 - 185
  • [30] Haemolytic uraemic syndrome after living-donor liver transplantation: Is small-for-size graft a potential risk factor?
    Luo, Y.
    Zhang, A.
    Huang, H.
    Zheng, S.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 36 (03) : 599 - 604