Bicentre, randomized, parallel-arm, sham-controlled trial of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of palliative care patients with refractory cancer pain

被引:4
|
作者
Nguyen, Jean-Paul [1 ,2 ]
Gaillard, Helene [2 ]
Suarez, Alcira [1 ]
Terzidis-Mallat, Elie [3 ]
Constant-David, Diane [2 ]
Van Langhenhove, Aurelien [2 ]
Evin, Adrien [2 ]
Malineau, Catherine [1 ]
Tan, Son V. O. [4 ]
Mhalla, Alaa [5 ,6 ]
Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal [5 ,7 ]
Nizard, Julien [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Unite Stimulat Transcranienne, Clin Breteche, Grp Elsan, F-44000 Nantes, France
[2] Ctr Hosp Univ CHU, UIC22 & Serv Douleur Soins Palliat & Soins Support, F-44930 Nantes, France
[3] Unite Soins Continus, Clin Breteche, Grp Elsan, F-44000 Nantes, France
[4] Univ Hosp, Serv Neurochirurg, Ho Chi Minh ville, Vietnam
[5] Univ Paris Est, Fac Medecine, EA43910, F-94000 Creteil, France
[6] Unite Douleur & Soins Palliat integres, DMU Canc & special, CHU Henri Mondor Albert Chenevrier, APHP, F-94000 Creteil, France
[7] Hop Henri Mondor, Unite Neurophysiol Clin, APHP, F-94000 Creteil, France
关键词
tDCS; Palliative care; Cancer pain; Treatment; Randomized trial; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION; MAGNETIC STIMULATION; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; VALIDATION; DEPRESSION; MANAGEMENT; ANXIETY; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1186/s12904-023-01129-0
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundPain is a common symptom in palliative care cancer patients and is often insufficiently relieved. In recent years, transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) of the motor cortex has been shown to be effective to treat chronic pain, essentially neuropathic pain. We propose to test the efficacy of tDCS in patients experiencing cancer pain in the palliative care setting.Method/designThis article describes the protocol of a bicentre, randomized, parallel-arm, sham-controlled clinical trial evaluating tDCS in the treatment of palliative care patients with refractory cancer pain. Seventy patients between the ages of 18 and 80 years experiencing refractory pain with a pain score of 4/10 on a numerical rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10 will be enrolled in this trial. The main exclusion criteria are patients unable to fill in the various rating scales and life expectancy less than 3 weeks. Treatment consists of 5 consecutive tDCS sessions targeting the motor cortex (one daily session for 5 days) on the contralateral side to the pain. After randomization (1:1 ratio), 35 patients will receive active stimulation and 35 patients will receive sham stimulation. The primary endpoint is the NRS score and the primary objective is a significant improvement of this score between the baseline score recorded between D-3 and D-1 and the score recorded 4 days after stopping treatment (D8). The secondary objectives are to evaluate whether this improvement is maintained 16 days after stopping treatment (D21) and whether the following scores are improved on D14 and D21: Brief Pain Inventory, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Medication Quantification Scale.DiscussionPositive results of this trial would indicate that tDCS can improve pain and quality of life of cancer patients in the palliative care setting. Reduction of analgesic consumption and improvement of activities of daily living should allow many patients to return home with a decreased workload for caregivers.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation compared to standard bupropion for the treatment of tobacco dependence: A randomized sham-controlled trial
    Behnam, Shahram Ghorbani
    Mousavi, Seyed Abbas
    Emamian, Mohammad Hassan
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 60 : 41 - 48
  • [22] Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Treatment for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
    Silva, Renata
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Goerigk, Stephan
    Batistuzzo, Marcelo
    Costa, Daniel
    Diniz, Juliana
    Padberg, Frank
    D'Urso, Giordano
    Miguel, Euripedes
    Shavitt, Roseli
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 87 (09) : S127 - S127
  • [23] Transcranial direct current stimulation for knee osteoarthritis: a single-blind randomized sham-controlled trial
    Azizi, Sirous
    Rezasoltani, Zahra
    Najafi, Sharif
    Mohebi, Bahare
    Tabatabaee, Seyed Morteza
    Dadarkhah, Afsaneh
    NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 51 (04): : 329 - 338
  • [24] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Wrist Robot-Assisted Integrated Treatment on Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
    Mazzoleni, Stefano
    Tran, Vi
    Iardella, Laura
    Falchi, Elisa
    Dario, Paolo
    Posteraro, Federico
    CONVERGING CLINICAL AND ENGINEERING RESEARCH ON NEUROREHABILITATION III, 2019, 21 : 518 - 522
  • [25] Lack of effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on short-term smoking cessation: Results of a randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial
    Falcone, Mary
    Bernardo, Leah
    Wileyto, E. Paul
    Allenby, Cheyenne
    Burke, Anne Marie
    Hamilton, Roy
    Cristancho, Mario
    Ashare, Rebecca L.
    Loughead, James
    Lerman, Caryn
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2019, 194 : 244 - 251
  • [26] Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Treatment Refractory Auditory Hallucinations: Preliminary Findings
    Lindenmayer, Jean-Pierre
    Sultana, Tania
    Kaur, Amandeep
    Khan, Anzalee
    Parker, Benedicto
    NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 41 : S573 - S574
  • [27] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for neuropathic pain: a randomized multicentre sham-controlled trial
    Attal, Nadine
    Poindessous-Jazat, Frederique
    De Chauvigny, Edwige
    Quesada, Charles
    Mhalla, Alaa
    Ayache, Samar S.
    Fermanian, Christophe
    Nizard, Julien
    Peyron, Roland
    Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal
    Bouhassira, Didier
    BRAIN, 2021, 144 : 3328 - 3339
  • [28] Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces seizure frequency in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, and three-arm parallel multicenter study
    Yang, Dongju
    Wang, Qun
    Xu, Cuiping
    Fang, Fang
    Fan, Jingjing
    Li, Liping
    Du, Qiaoyi
    Zhang, Ruihua
    Wang, Ye
    Lin, Yicong
    Huang, Zhaoyang
    Wang, Hongmei
    Chen, Chunhong
    Xu, Qinlan
    Wang, Yue
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhang, Zhang
    Zhao, Xin
    Zhao, Xuan
    Li, Ting
    Liu, Chunyan
    Niu, Yulian
    Zhou, Qihui
    Zhou, Qilin
    Duan, Yiran
    Liu, Xiao
    Yu, Tingting
    Xue, Qing
    Li, Jing
    Dai, Xiaona
    Han, Jiaqi
    Ren, Changhong
    Xu, Huini
    Li, Na
    Zhang, Jishui
    Xu, Na
    Yang, Kun
    Wang, Yuping
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (01) : 109 - 116
  • [29] A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury
    Fregni, Felipe
    Boggio, Paulo S.
    Lima, Moises C.
    Ferreira, Merari J. L.
    Wagner, Tim
    Rigonatti, Sergio P.
    Castro, Anita W.
    Souza, Daniel R.
    Riberto, Marcelo
    Freedman, Steven D.
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    PAIN, 2006, 122 (1-2) : 197 - 209
  • [30] Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation in Subacute Aphasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Stockbridge, Melissa D.
    Elm, Jordan
    Breining, Bonnie L.
    Tippett, Donna C.
    Sebastian, Rajani
    Cassarly, Christy
    Teklehaimanot, Abeba
    Spell, Leigh Ann
    Sheppard, Shannon M.
    Vitti, Emilia
    Ruch, Kristina
    Goldberg, Emily B.
    Kelly, Catherine
    Keator, Lynsey M.
    Fridriksson, Julius
    Hillis, Argye E.
    STROKE, 2023, 54 (04) : 912 - 920