A new model for the occupational health and safety risk assessment process: Neutrosophic FMEA

被引:4
|
作者
Karamustafa, Merve [1 ]
Ceb, Selcuk [2 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Occupat Hlth & Safety Coordinatorship, TR-34349 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Yildiz Tech Univ, Fac Mech Engn, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34349 Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Risk analysis; neutrosophic set theory; FMEA; fuzzy inference system; occupational health and safety; FAILURE MODE; PRIORITIZATION METHOD; AHP;
D O I
10.17341/gazimmfd.976297
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In risk assessment, the decision is generally made according to the most probable situation. However, the fact that there are rarely realized outcomes and that the degree of effectiveness of the precaution applied against any risk is not measured are the indetermanicies encountered in risk assessment. In the literature, there are various risk assesment approaches based on fuzzy logic to handle the uncertainties in specialist evaluation. Therefore, in this study, a neutrophic set based Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) method, includes probability, severity and detectability parameters, is proposed for the first time in the literature to handle inconsistencies, subjectivities and indecisions in the risk assessment process. In the proposed method, membership degrees of truth (T), indetarmancy (I) and falsity (F) used in neutrosophic set definition are preferred in the probability, severity and detectability parameters of FMEA method, while different dimensions of expert assessment of a risk and uncertanities regarding risk assessment is taken into account. Mamdani fuzzy inference system is used instead of multiplication in determining risk depending on FMEA parameters. The risk assessment method developed in the study was applied in the chemical industry. The results obtained from the application were compared with classical and fuzzy FMEA. The results showed the success of the proposed method in considering the instabilities and subjectivity-related uncertainties in risk assessment compared to existing methods.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 43
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of leadership behavior in occupational health and safety
    Cristina May, Nilma
    Concepcion Batiz, Eduardo
    Montero Martinez, Ricardo
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2019, 63 (03): : 405 - 413
  • [42] Occupational Safety And Risk Assessment In The Mining Industry
    Radosavljevic, Slobodan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2008, 2 (04) : 277 - 284
  • [43] Injury risk assessment for occupational safety standards
    Martonik, JF
    Grossman, EA
    Gordon, CP
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1998, 4 (06): : 1259 - 1264
  • [44] Ensuring the Quality of Occupational Safety Risk Assessment
    Pinto, Abel
    Ribeiro, Rita A.
    Nunes, Isabel L.
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2013, 33 (03) : 409 - 419
  • [45] THE CHIEF MECHANIC OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND RISK ASSESSMENT
    Boriskin, O. I.
    Larin, S. N.
    Nuzhdin, G. A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TULA STATES UNIVERSITY-SCIENCES OF EARTH, 2022, 1 : 177 - 189
  • [46] Trichloroethylene health risk assessment: A new and improved process
    Maull, EA
    Cogliano, VJ
    Scott, CS
    Barton, HA
    Fisher, JW
    Greenberg, M
    Rhomberg, L
    Sorgen, SP
    DRUG AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 20 (04) : 427 - 442
  • [47] Application of occupational hazard risk index model in occupational health risk assessment in a decorative coating manufacturing enterprises
    贺培兰
    ChinaMedicalAbstracts(InternalMedicine), 2018, 35 (02) : 75 - 76
  • [48] Regulation and risk: Occupational health and safety on the railways
    Macrae, C
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2004, 24 (02) : 509 - 510
  • [50] The Importance to Evaluate Risk of Occupational Health and Safety
    Nedelcu, A.
    Dumitrascu, A. -E
    Cristea, L.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INSTRUMENTATION, MEASUREMENT, CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS: INSTRUMENTATION, MEASUREMENT, ELECTRONICS, CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2009, : 79 - +