Surgical skill level classification model development using EEG and eye-gaze data and machine learning algorithms

被引:2
|
作者
Shafiei, Somayeh B. [1 ]
Shadpour, Saeed [2 ]
Mohler, James L. [3 ]
Sasangohar, Farzan [4 ]
Gutierrez, Camille [5 ]
Toussi, Mehdi Seilanian [1 ]
Shafqat, Ambreen [1 ]
机构
[1] Roswell Pk Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Intelligent Canc Care Lab, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[2] Univ Guelph, Dept Anim Biosci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Roswell Pk Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Mike & Sugar Barnes Fac Fellow 2, Wm Michael Barnes & Dept Ind & Syst Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[5] Sisters Char Hlth Syst, Obstet & Gynecol Residency Program, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Blunt dissection; Retraction; Burn dissection; Hysterectomy; Cystectomy; Nephrectomy; Robot-assisted surgery; Expertise level; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; NETWORK; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-023-01722-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to develop machine learning classification models using electroencephalogram (EEG) and eye-gaze features to predict the level of surgical expertise in robot-assisted surgery (RAS). EEG and eye-gaze data were recorded from 11 participants who performed cystectomy, hysterectomy, and nephrectomy using the da Vinci robot. Skill level was evaluated by an expert RAS surgeon using the modified Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) tool, and data from three subtasks were extracted to classify skill levels using three classification models-multinomial logistic regression (MLR), random forest (RF), and gradient boosting (GB). The GB algorithm was used with a combination of EEG and eye-gaze data to classify skill levels, and differences between the models were tested using two-sample t tests. The GB model using EEG features showed the best performance for blunt dissection (83% accuracy), retraction (85% accuracy), and burn dissection (81% accuracy). The combination of EEG and eye-gaze features using the GB algorithm improved the accuracy of skill level classification to 88% for blunt dissection, 93% for retraction, and 86% for burn dissection. The implementation of objective skill classification models in clinical settings may enhance the RAS surgical training process by providing objective feedback about performance to surgeons and their teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:2963 / 2971
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Proficiency Level Classification of Foreign Language Learners Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Multilingual Models
    Hnatkowska, Bogumila
    Wawrzyniak, Damian
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE, ICCCI 2022, 2022, 13501 : 261 - 271
  • [42] Potential of machine learning algorithms in groundwater level prediction using temporal gravity data
    Sarkar, Himangshu
    Goriwale, Swastik Sunil
    Ghosh, Jayanta Kumar
    Ojha, Chandra Shekhar Prasad
    Ghosh, Sanjay Kumar
    [J]. GROUNDWATER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 25
  • [43] Classification of Children With Autism and Typical Development Using Eye-Tracking Data From Face-to-Face Conversations: Machine Learning Model Development and Performance Evaluation
    Zhao, Zhong
    Tang, Haiming
    Zhang, Xiaobin
    Qu, Xingda
    Hu, Xinyao
    Lu, Jianping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (08)
  • [44] Classification of focal and non-focal EEG signals using neighborhood component analysis and machine learning algorithms
    Raghu, Shivarudhrappa
    Sriraam, Natarajan
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 113 : 18 - 32
  • [45] Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for Alzheimer's disease classification using EEG signals and genetic information
    Yu, Wei-Yang
    Sun, Ting-Hsuan
    Hsu, Kai-Cheng
    Wang, Chia-Chun
    Chien, Shang-Yu
    Tsai, Chon-Haw
    Yang, Yu-Wan
    [J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2024, 176
  • [46] Machine Learning Based Skill-level Classification for Personal Mobility Devices Using Only Operational Characteristics
    Huang, Yifan
    Kamezaki, Mitsuhiro
    Mori, Taiga
    Manawadu, Udara E.
    Ishihara, Tatsuya
    Nakano, Masahiro
    Koshiji, Kohjun
    Higo, Naoki
    Tubaki, Toshimitsu
    Sugano, Shigeki
    [J]. 2018 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS), 2018, : 5469 - 5476
  • [47] Nitrate Classification Based on Optical Absorbance Data Using Machine Learning Algorithms for a Hydroponics System
    Sulaiman, Rozita
    Azeman, Nur Hidayah
    Abu Bakar, Mohd Hafiz
    Nazri, Nur Afifah Ahmad
    Masran, Athiyah Sakinah
    Bakar, Ahmad Ashrif A.
    [J]. APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY, 2023, 77 (02) : 210 - 219
  • [48] Comparative Analysis of Transformer Fault Classification Based on DGA Data Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Coban, Melih
    Fidan, Murat
    Aytar, Oktay
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS 2024 IEEE 6TH GLOBAL POWER, ENERGY AND COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE, IEEE GPECOM 2024, 2024, : 263 - 267
  • [49] Classification and diagnostic prediction of breast cancer metastasis on clinical data using machine learning algorithms
    Botlagunta, Mahendran
    Botlagunta, Madhavi Devi
    Myneni, Madhu Bala
    Lakshmi, D.
    Nayyar, Anand
    Gullapalli, Jaithra Sai
    Shah, Mohd Asif
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [50] Objects Classification based on UWB Scattered Field and SEM Data using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Zaky, Yasmina
    Fortino, Nicolas
    Dauvignac, Jean-Yves
    Miramond, Benoit
    [J]. 2021 18TH EUROPEAN RADAR CONFERENCE (EURAD), 2021, : 369 - 372