Chaos and ergodicity in a partially integrable 3d Bohmian system: a comparison with 2d systems

被引:0
|
作者
Tzemos, A. C. [1 ]
Contopoulos, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Athens, Res Ctr Astron & Appl Math, Soranou Efessiou 4, GR-11527 Athens, Greece
关键词
chaos; Bohmian mechanics; ergodicity; SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION; SIGNAL-LOCALITY; QUANTUM-THEORY; EQUILIBRIUM; UNCERTAINTY; MOTION; ORIGIN; TERMS;
D O I
10.1088/1402-4896/acd4f8
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
In the present paper we study the Bohmian dynamics of a partially integrable 3d Bohmian system whose trajectories evolve on spherical surfaces. By use of spherical coordinates (R, phi, theta) we study the behaviour of unstable fixed points that generate chaos on the (phi, theta) plane and discuss the differences between them and those of planar 2d systems. Finally, we show for the first time that the chaotic trajectories of this system are ergodic although the number of its nodes is very small (two). Thus we can observe ergodicity not only in multinodal 2d systems but also in partially integrable systems with few nodes due to their curved geometry.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] From 2D to 3D
    Steven De Feyter
    Nature Chemistry, 2011, 3 (1) : 14 - 15
  • [42] TBC and PML conditions for 2D and 3D BPM: a comparison
    F. Fogli
    G. Bellanca
    P. Bassi
    Optical and Quantum Electronics, 1998, 30 : 443 - 456
  • [43] A comparison of 2D and 3D brain FDG-PET.
    Lee, JR
    Choi, Y
    Kim, SE
    Lee, KH
    Choe, YS
    Shin, SA
    Kim, BT
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1996, 37 (05) : 1023 - 1023
  • [44] Quantitative comparison of 3D and 2D PET with brain studies
    Sossi, V
    Oakes, TR
    Chan, G
    Ruth, TJ
    1997 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM - CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1 & 2, 1998, : 1438 - 1441
  • [45] Comparison of muscle function in 2D and 3D walking simulations
    Xiao, Ming
    Higginson, Jill
    PROCEEDING OF THE ASME SUMMER BIOENGINEERING CONFERENCE - 2007, 2007, : 15 - 16
  • [46] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D MODELS OF SALINITY NUMERICAL SIMULATION
    Li Chunhui
    Pan Xishan
    Ke Jie
    Dong Xiaotian
    POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH, 2015, 22 : 26 - 29
  • [47] 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison
    Berssenbruegge, Philipp
    Berlin, Nina Franka
    Kebeck, Guenther
    Runte, Christoph
    Jung, Susanne
    Kleinheinz, Johannes
    Dirksen, Dieter
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 42 (06) : E327 - E334
  • [48] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D WELDING SIMULATIONS OF A SIMPLE PLATE
    Dewees, David J.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, PVP 2012, VOL 2, 2012, : 273 - 281
  • [49] Comparison of 2D and 3D myocardial PET imaging.
    Knesaurek, K
    Machac, J
    Krynyckyi, BR
    Almeida, OD
    Parisi, JC
    Kim, CK
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 42 (05) : 46P - 46P
  • [50] Comparison of a 2D and 3D Array of Diodes for IMRT QA
    Lawrence, M.
    Potter, L.
    Cullip, T.
    Xu, Z.
    Deschesne, K.
    Chang, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06)