Design and performance optimization of solar water heating system with perforated obstacle using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach

被引:21
|
作者
Khargotra, Rohit [1 ]
Kumar, Raj [2 ]
Sharma, Ashutosh [3 ]
Singh, Tej [4 ]
机构
[1] Pannonia Univ, Inst Mat Engn, Fac Engn, H-8200 Veszprem, Hungary
[2] Shoolini Univ, Fac Engn & Technol, Solan 173229, HP, India
[3] Dr BR Ambedkar NIT, Dept Mech Engn, Jalandhar 144011, India
[4] Eotvos Lorand Univ, Savaria Inst Technol, Fac Informat, H-9700 Szombathely, Hungary
关键词
Solar water heating system; Perforated obstacle; Thermal performance; AHP-ARAS; SITE SELECTION; ARAS; HEATER; ALTERNATIVES; MODEL; RATIO;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2023.107099
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Solar water heating system (SWHS) is a cost-effective technology with high household adoption rates worldwide. The performance of SWHS significantly deteriorates due to several factors, including design parameters as well as radiative and convective heat losses from the system, which considerably impair the system's efficiency. Novel designs and unique heat transfer techniques are increasingly being explored to improve the efficiency of SWHS. In this framework, the following research focuses on designing and optimizing an SWHS integrated with perforated delta obstacles. The influence of Reynolds number (400, 800, 1200), angle of attack (15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees), and pitch ratio (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.0) on the friction factor, Nusselt number, and thermo-hydraulic performance was investigated and optimized. The combination of Reynolds number = 1200, angle of attack = 45 degrees, and pitch ratio = 1 yielded the most significant Nusselt number (90.55). In contrast, the combination of Reynolds number = 1200, angle of attack = 15 degrees, and pitch ratio = 0.5 yielded the lowest friction factor (0.38). The largest thermo-hydraulic efficiency (2.75) was obtained using Reynolds number = 400, angle of attack = 45 degrees, and pitch ratio = 1. Since no single SWHS design alternative can meet all desired performance criteria, selecting the best among SWHS design alternatives is not easy. Therefore, a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach called AHP (analytic hierarchy process)-ARAS (additive ratio assessment) was implemented, suggesting the SWHS design alternative having the angle of attack = 45 degrees, Reynolds number = 1200, and pitch ratio = 1 satisfies the preset performance criteria. Finally, sensitivity analysis and validation with other decision-making approaches were performed to verify the proposed decision-making framework's effectiveness, proving the results' robustness.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An Innovative Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach under Picture Fuzzy Information
    Ali, Ghous
    Ul Abidin, Muhammad Zain
    Xin, Qin
    Tawfiq, Ferdous M. O.
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (11):
  • [42] Proposing a new hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach for road maintenance prioritization
    Sayadinia, Shakiba
    Beheshtinia, Mohammad Ali
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 38 (08) : 1661 - 1679
  • [43] A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for performance analysis and evaluation of park-level integrated energy system
    Zhou, Jianli
    Wu, Yunna
    Wu, Chenghao
    Deng, Zhongqing
    Xu, Chuanbo
    Hu, Yong
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 201
  • [44] Stakeholder-Oriented Optimization of Pavement Maintenance Interventions Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Eddula, Sai Vighnesh
    Peraka, Naga Siva Pavani
    Biligiri, Krishna Prapoorna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAVEMENT RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 17 (03) : 787 - 799
  • [45] Stakeholder-Oriented Optimization of Pavement Maintenance Interventions Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Sai Vighnesh Eddula
    Naga Siva Pavani Peraka
    Krishna Prapoorna Biligiri
    International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 2024, 17 : 787 - 799
  • [46] Comparison of design concepts in multi-criteria decision-making using level diagrams
    Reynoso-Meza, Gilberto
    Blasco, Xavier
    Sanchis, Javier
    Herrero, Juan M.
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 221 : 124 - 141
  • [47] Evaluating demand forecasting models using multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Badulescu, Yvonne
    Hameri, Ari-Pekka
    Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2021, 18 (05) : 661 - 683
  • [48] Cyber Security Metrics Evaluation Using Multi-criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Bhol, Seema Gupta
    Mohanty, J. R.
    Pattnaik, Prasant Kumar
    SMART INTELLIGENT COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS, VOL 2, 2020, 160 : 665 - 675
  • [49] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Cansu Dağsuyu
    Ulviye Polat
    Ali Kokangül
    Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 7169 - 7180
  • [50] Multi-criteria linguistic interval group decision-making approach
    Wang Jianqiang & Chen Xiaohong School of Business
    Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2008, (05) : 934 - 938