Influence of quantum states imperfections on the error rate in measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

被引:0
|
作者
Kupriyanov, P. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Rudavin, N. V. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Gerasin, I. S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Dvurechenskiy, A. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Petrov, I. V. [1 ,3 ]
Menskoy, D. D. [1 ,3 ]
Shakhovoy, R. A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] QRate, Moscow, Russia
[2] Moscow Inst Phys & Technol, Dolgoprudnyi, Moscow, Russia
[3] Natl Univ Sci & Technol MISiS, NTI Ctr Quantum Commun, Moscow, Russia
[4] Russian Quantum Ctr, Skolkovo, Moscow, Russia
[5] HSE Univ, Moscow, Russia
关键词
measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution; imperfect states; time-bin phase-encoding;
D O I
10.18721/JPM.163.211
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Quantum key distribution (QKD) is a modern technology that allows two legitimate users obtaining a shared cryptographic key completely secure. Unfortunately, real implementations of QKD systems contain vulnerabilities, such that an eavesdropper can still get information about the key. Therefore, QKD protocols generally use privacy amplification procedures that reduce the size of the key depending on the level of errors that are generally assumed to be caused by a non-legitimate user. So, the quantum bit error rate (QBER) becomes an important parameter significantly affecting the rate of key distribution. In this work, we investigate the influence of quantum states imperfections on the QBER in the measurement-device-independent QKD protocol with time-bin encoding. We proposed a theoretical model that describes imperfect states, and derived formulas for the dependence of the error level on the degree of imperfection. We also conducted an experiment, the results of which are in good agreement with the predictions of the theory.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficient decoy states for the reference-frame-independent measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution
    Lu, Feng-Yu
    Yin, Zhen-Qiang
    Fan-Yuan, Guan-Jie
    Wang, Rong
    Liu, Hang
    Wang, Shuang
    Chen, Wei
    He, De-Yong
    Huang, Wei
    Xu, Bing-Jie
    Guo, Guang-Can
    Han, Zheng-Fu
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2020, 101 (05)
  • [42] Reference-Frame-Independent Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution With Modified Coherent States
    Zhang, Chun-Mei
    Zhu, Jian-Rong
    Wang, Qin
    IEEE PHOTONICS JOURNAL, 2018, 10 (05):
  • [43] Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with q-plate
    Dong Chen
    Zhao Shang-Hong
    Sun Ying
    Quantum Information Processing, 2015, 14 : 4575 - 4584
  • [44] Measurement-Device-Independent Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution
    Hua-Lei Yin
    Yao Fu
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [45] Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with uncharacterized qubit sources
    Yin, Zhen-Qiang
    Fung, Chi-Hang Fred
    Ma, Xiongfeng
    Zhang, Chun-Mei
    Li, Hong-Wei
    Chen, Wei
    Wang, Shuang
    Guo, Guang-Can
    Han, Zheng-Fu
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2013, 88 (06):
  • [46] Plug-and-play measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution
    Choi, Yujun
    Kwon, Osung
    Woo, Minki
    Oh, Kyunghwan
    Han, Sang-Wook
    Kim, Yong-Su
    Moon, Sung
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2016, 93 (03)
  • [47] Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution coexisting with classical communication
    Valivarthi, R.
    Umesh, P.
    John, C.
    Owen, K. A.
    Verma, V. B.
    Nam, S. W.
    Oblak, D.
    Zhou, Q.
    Tillel, W.
    QUANTUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 4 (04)
  • [48] Differential phase encoded measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution
    Ranu, Shashank Kumar
    Prabhakar, Anil
    Mandayam, Prabha
    QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2021, 20 (02)
  • [49] Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with odd coherent state
    Dong Chen
    Zhao Shang-Hong
    Zhang Ning
    Dong Yi
    Zhao Wei-Hu
    Liu Yun
    ACTA PHYSICA SINICA, 2014, 63 (20)
  • [50] Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with odd coherent state
    Dong Chen
    Zhao Shang-Hong
    Zhao Wei-Hu
    JOURNAL OF MODERN OPTICS, 2014, 61 (15) : 1246 - 1250