The development and psychometric evaluation of the Questionnaire Epistemic Trust (QET): A self-report assessment of epistemic trust

被引:5
|
作者
Knapen, Saskia [1 ,8 ]
Swildens, Wilma E. [2 ]
Mensink, Wendy [3 ]
Hoogendoorn, Adriaan [4 ,5 ]
Hutsebaut, Joost [6 ,7 ]
Beekman, Aartjan T. F. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Altrecht Mental Hlth Care, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Inholland Univ Appl Sci, Altrecht Mental Hlth Care, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Altrecht Mental Hlth Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Tilburg Univ, Halsteren, Netherlands
[7] Viersprong Inst Study Personal Disorders, Halsteren, Netherlands
[8] Altrecht Mental Hlth Care, Levenspad 8, NL-3705 WB Zeist, Netherlands
关键词
epistemic trust; personality functioning; psychometric evaluation; questionnaire; self-report; WORKING ALLIANCE; PERSONALITY-DISORDER; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SEVERITY; OUTCOMES; SUPPORT; INDEXES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1002/cpp.2930
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Epistemic trust (ET) refers to the predisposition to trust information as authentic, trustworthy and relevant to the self. Epistemic distrust - resulting from early adversity - may interfere with openness to social learning within the therapeutic encounter, reducing the ability to benefit from treatment. The self-report Questionnaire Epistemic Trust (QET) is a newly developed instrument that aims to assess ET. This study presents the first results on the psychometric properties of the QET in both a community and a clinical sample. Our findings indicate that the QET is composed of four meaningful subscales with good to excellent internal consistency. The QET shows relevant associations with related constructs like personality functioning, symptom distress and quality of life. QET scores clearly distinguish between a clinical and community sample and are associated with the quality of the therapeutic alliance. The QET provides a promising, brief and user-friendly instrument that could be used for a range of clinical and research purposes. Future studies with larger samples are needed to strengthen construct validity and to investigate the value of the QET to predict differential treatment responses or to study mechanisms of change.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust
    Campbell, Chloe
    Tanzer, Michal
    Saunders, Rob
    Booker, Thomas
    Allison, Elizabeth
    Li, Elizabeth
    O'Dowda, Claire
    Luyten, Patrick
    Fonagy, Peter
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (04):
  • [2] The Epistemic Trust Assessment-An Experimental Measure of Epistemic Trust
    Schroeder-Pfeifer, Paul
    Georg, Anna K.
    Talia, Alessandro
    Volkert, Jana
    Ditzen, Beate
    Taubner, Svenja
    PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 39 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [3] Deep Disagreement, Epistemic Norms, and Epistemic Self-trust
    Barker, Simon
    EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2023,
  • [4] Epistemic emotions and self-trust
    Bortolan, Anna
    PHENOMENOLOGY AND THE COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2024,
  • [5] Trust under development: The Italian validation of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ) for adolescents
    Milesi, Alberto
    Liotti, Marianna
    Locati, Francesca
    De Carli, Pietro
    Speranza, Anna Maria
    Campbell, Chloe
    Fonagy, Peter
    Lingiardi, Vittorio
    Parolin, Laura
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [6] Epistemic trust and associations with psychopathology: Validation of the German version of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust and Credulity-Questionnaire (ETMCQ)
    Weiland, Anna-Maria
    Taubner, Svenja
    Zettl, Max
    Bartmann, Leonie C.
    Frohn, Nina
    Luginsland, Mirijam
    Volkert, Jana
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (11):
  • [7] Unpacking trust: The Italian validation of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ)
    Liotti, Marianna
    Milesi, Alberto
    Spitoni, Grazia Fernanda
    Tanzilli, Annalisa
    Speranza, Anna Maria
    Parolin, Laura
    Campbell, Chloe
    Fonagy, Peter
    Lingiardi, Vittorio
    Giovanardi, Guido
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (01):
  • [8] Epistemic Self-Trust and Doxastic Disagreements
    Fabienne Peter
    Erkenntnis, 2019, 84 : 1189 - 1205
  • [9] Epistemic Self-Trust and Doxastic Disagreements
    Peter, Fabienne
    ERKENNTNIS, 2019, 84 (06) : 1189 - 1205
  • [10] Epistemic Self-Trust: It's Personal
    Dormandy, Katherine
    EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2024, 21 (01): : 34 - 49