Optimal investment in ambiguous financial markets with learning

被引:2
|
作者
Baeuerle, Nicole [1 ]
Mahayni, Antje [2 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol KIT, Inst Stochast, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Mercator Sch Management, Lotharstr 65, D-47057 Duisburg, Germany
关键词
Portfolio optimization; Learning; Smooth ambiguity; Duality theory; Bayesian investment problem; OPTIMAL PORTFOLIO CHOICE; UTILITY MAXIMIZATION; ROBUST-CONTROL; DUAL THEORY; RISK; PREFERENCES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2024.01.022
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We consider the classical multi -asset Merton investment problem under drift uncertainty, i.e. the asset price dynamics are given by geometric Brownian motions with constant but unknown drift coefficients. The investor assumes a prior drift distribution and is able to learn by observing the asset prize realizations during the investment horizon. While the solution of an expected utility maximizing investor with constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) is well known, we consider the optimization problem under risk and ambiguity preferences by means of the KMM (Klibanoff et al., 2005) approach. Here, the investor maximizes a double certainty equivalent. The inner certainty equivalent is for given drift coefficient, the outer is based on a drift distribution. Assuming also a CRRA type ambiguity function, it turns out that the optimal strategy can be stated in terms of the solution without ambiguity preferences but an adjusted drift distribution. To the best of our knowledge an explicit solution method in this setting is new. We rely on some duality theorems to prove our statements. Based on our theoretical results, we are able to shed light on the impact of the prior drift distribution as well as the consequences of ambiguity preferences via the transfer to an adjusted drift distribution, i.e. we are able to explain the interaction of risk and ambiguity preferences. We compare our results with the ones in a pre -commitment setup where the investor is restricted to deterministic strategies. It turns out that (under risk and ambiguity aversion) an infinite investment horizon implies in both cases a maximin decision rule, i.e. the investor follows the worst (best) Merton fraction (over all realizations of it) if she is more (less) risk averse than a log -investor. We illustrate our findings with an extensive numerical study.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 410
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OPTIMAL FINANCIAL POLICY IN IMPERFECT MARKETS
    LLOYDDAVIES, PR
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1975, 10 (03) : 457 - 481
  • [22] Reinforcement Learning in Financial Markets
    Meng, Terry Lingze
    Khushi, Matloob
    DATA, 2019, 4 (03)
  • [23] Adaptive learning in financial markets
    Routledge, BR
    REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1999, 12 (05): : 1165 - 1202
  • [24] An Optimal Investment Strategy for Insurers in Incomplete Markets
    Badaoui, Mohamed
    Fernandez, Begona
    Swishchuk, Anatoliy
    RISKS, 2018, 6 (02):
  • [25] Optimal consumption and investment for markets with random coefficients
    Belkacem Berdjane
    Serguei Pergamenshchikov
    Finance and Stochastics, 2013, 17 : 419 - 446
  • [26] Optimal consumption and investment for markets with random coefficients
    Berdjane, Belkacem
    Pergamenshchikov, Serguei
    FINANCE AND STOCHASTICS, 2013, 17 (02) : 419 - 446
  • [27] Optimal investment with random endowments in incomplete markets
    Hugonnier, J
    Kramkov, D
    ANNALS OF APPLIED PROBABILITY, 2004, 14 (02): : 845 - 864
  • [28] Position of globalization in absorption of investment and development of financial markets
    Nakhaie, Hamid
    Zadeh, Asma Esmail
    INFORMATION AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, ICIFE 2011, 2011, 12 : 510 - 512
  • [29] Investment Decisions in Global Financial Markets: the Experience of Lithuania
    Rutkauskas, Aleksandras Vytautas
    Kvietkauskiene, Alina
    ENTREPRENEURIAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2013, 1 (04) : 21 - 35
  • [30] The Tradeoff between Consumption and Investment in Incomplete Financial Markets
    Wendell H. Fleming
    Daniel Hernández-Hernández
    Applied Mathematics and Optimization, 2005, 52 : 219 - 235